These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30530171)

  • 1. A singleton distractor updates the inhibitory template for visual marking.
    Yamauchi K; Kawahara JI
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():200-211. PubMed ID: 30530171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional Capture to a Singleton Distractor Degrades Visual Marking in Visual Search.
    Yamauchi K; Osugi T; Murakami I
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():801. PubMed ID: 28559878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The preview benefit in single-feature and conjunction search: Constraints of visual marking.
    Meinhardt G; Persike M
    J Vis; 2015; 15(13):13. PubMed ID: 26382004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
    Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selection of new objects by onset capture and visual marking.
    Osugi T; Hayashi D; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2016 May; 122():21-33. PubMed ID: 27001341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Onset of background dynamic noise attenuates preview benefit in inefficient visual search.
    Osugi T; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2015 Jul; 112():33-44. PubMed ID: 25976299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual marking and change blindness: moving occluders and transient masks neutralize shape changes to ignored objects.
    Watson DG; Kunar MA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1391-405. PubMed ID: 20853998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual marking inhibits singleton capture.
    Olivers CN; Humphreys GW
    Cogn Psychol; 2003 Aug; 47(1):1-42. PubMed ID: 12852934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.
    Lamy D; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attentional shift to the newer object in the successive and simultaneous distractors previewing search.
    Osugi T
    Vision Res; 2023 Aug; 209():108262. PubMed ID: 37210863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Object-based inhibitory priming in preview search: evidence from the "top-up" procedure.
    Kunar MA; Humphreys GW
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Apr; 34(3):459-74. PubMed ID: 16933757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Foraging through multiple target categories reveals the flexibility of visual working memory.
    Kristjánsson T; Kristjánsson Á
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Feb; 183():108-115. PubMed ID: 29275949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual marking: the effects of irrelevant changes on preview search.
    Watson DG; Humphreys GW
    Percept Psychophys; 2005 Apr; 67(3):418-34. PubMed ID: 16119391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrophysiological correlates of active suppression and attentional selection in preview visual search.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Nov; 120():75-85. PubMed ID: 30359651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flexible feature-based inhibition in visual search mediates magnified impairments of selection: evidence from carry-over effects under dynamic preview-search conditions.
    Andrews LS; Watson DG; Humphreys GW; Braithwaite JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Aug; 37(4):1007-16. PubMed ID: 21553995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual Competition Promotes Suppression of Reward Salience in Behavioral Selection and Neural Representation.
    Gong M; Jia K; Li S
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 37(26):6242-6252. PubMed ID: 28539425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Previewing distractors reduces efficiency of visual processing at previewed locations.
    Osugi T; Murakami I
    Vision Res; 2014 Feb; 95():51-60. PubMed ID: 24368220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visuospatial working memory mediates inhibitory and facilitatory guidance in preview search.
    Barrett DJ; Shimozaki SS; Jensen S; Zobay O
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1533-46. PubMed ID: 27195768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do we remember templates better so that we can reject distractors better?
    Rajsic J; Woodman GF
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):269-279. PubMed ID: 30937674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.