These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30530692)

  • 1. People use less information than they think to make up their minds.
    Klein N; O'Brien E
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Dec; 115(52):13222-13227. PubMed ID: 30530692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Too much experience: a desensitization bias in emotional perspective taking.
    Campbell T; O'Brien E; Van Boven L; Schwarz N; Ubel P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 Feb; 106(2):272-85. PubMed ID: 24467422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lessons from the evolution of 401(k) retirement plans for increased consumerism in health care: an application of behavioral research.
    DiCenzo J; Fronstin P
    EBRI Issue Brief; 2008 Aug; (320):1, 3-26. PubMed ID: 18724525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.
    Reyna VF; Farley F
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2006 Sep; 7(1):1-44. PubMed ID: 26158695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postdecisional counterfactual thinking by actors and readers.
    Girotto V; Ferrante D; Pighin S; Gonzalez M
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Jun; 18(6):510-5. PubMed ID: 17576264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Think twice and then: combining or choosing in dialectical bootstrapping?
    Herzog SM; Hertwig R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):218-32. PubMed ID: 24016140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Causal evidence in risk and policy perceptions: Applying the covariation/mechanism framework.
    Baucum M; John R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 May; 186():90-103. PubMed ID: 29627061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pitting intuitive and analytical thinking against each other: the case of transitivity.
    Rusou Z; Zakay D; Usher M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Jun; 20(3):608-14. PubMed ID: 23720102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of unconscious decision aids applied to complex patient-centered medical decisions.
    Manigault AW; Handley IM; Whillock SR
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Feb; 17(2):e37. PubMed ID: 25677337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of introspection on judgment and decision making is dependent on the quality of conscious thinking.
    Leisti T; Häkkinen J
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():340-351. PubMed ID: 27131852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experiential limitation in judgment and decision.
    Hahn U
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Apr; 6(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 24648405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Judgment and decision making.
    Mellers BA; Schwartz A; Cooke AD
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1998; 49():447-77. PubMed ID: 9496629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When good evidence goes bad: the weak evidence effect in judgment and decision-making.
    Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA
    Cognition; 2011 Jun; 119(3):459-67. PubMed ID: 21345428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of analytic and experiential modes of thought on moral judgment.
    Kvaran T; Nichols S; Sanfey A
    Prog Brain Res; 2013; 202():187-96. PubMed ID: 23317833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Confidence and corrections: how we make and un-make up our minds.
    Pearson J; Platt ML
    Neuron; 2009 Sep; 63(6):724-6. PubMed ID: 19778502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predicting our own and others' future preferences: The role of social distance.
    Bauckham G; Lambert R; Atance CM; Davidson PS; Taler V; Renoult L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):634-642. PubMed ID: 29471710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought.
    Clore GL; Huntsinger JR
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Sep; 11(9):393-9. PubMed ID: 17698405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Counterfactual Thought.
    Byrne RM
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2016; 67():135-57. PubMed ID: 26393873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Choice as an engine of analytic thought.
    Savani K; Stephens NM; Markus HR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Sep; 146(9):1234-1246. PubMed ID: 28846005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Causality in thought.
    Sloman SA; Lagnado D
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2015 Jan; 66():223-47. PubMed ID: 25061673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.