279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30530818)
1. Novel prognostic histopathological grading system in oral squamous cell carcinoma based on tumour budding and cell nest size shows high interobserver and intraobserver concordance.
Boxberg M; Bollwein C; Jöhrens K; Kuhn PH; Haller B; Steiger K; Wolff KD; Kolk A; Jesinghaus M; Weichert W
J Clin Pathol; 2019 Apr; 72(4):285-294. PubMed ID: 30530818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tumour budding activity and cell nest size determine patient outcome in oral squamous cell carcinoma: proposal for an adjusted grading system.
Boxberg M; Jesinghaus M; Dorfner C; Mogler C; Drecoll E; Warth A; Steiger K; Bollwein C; Meyer P; Wolff KD; Kolk A; Weichert W
Histopathology; 2017 Jun; 70(7):1125-1137. PubMed ID: 28122134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cellular Dissociation Grading Based on the Parameters Tumor Budding and Cell Nest Size in Pretherapeutic Biopsy Specimens Allows for Prognostic Patient Stratification in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Independent From Clinical Staging.
Jesinghaus M; Brühl F; Steiger K; Klare P; Reiser M; Scheiter A; Konukiewitz B; Kuhn P; Münch S; Quante M; Schmid RM; Wilhelm D; Feith M; Friess H; Combs SE; Saur D; Boxberg M; Weichert W
Am J Surg Pathol; 2019 May; 43(5):618-627. PubMed ID: 30807302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tumor budding in colorectal carcinoma: An institutional interobserver reliability and prognostic study of colorectal adenocarcinoma cases.
Hacking S; Angert M; Jin C; Kline M; Gupta N; Cho M; Thomas R; Lee L; Chavarria H; Nasim M
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2019 Dec; 43():151420. PubMed ID: 31731034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Independent Validation of Tumor Budding Activity and Cell Nest Size as Determinants of Patient Outcome in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix.
Zare SY; Aisagbonhi O; Hasteh F; Fadare O
Am J Surg Pathol; 2020 Sep; 44(9):1151-1160. PubMed ID: 32452873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Introducing a novel highly prognostic grading scheme based on tumour budding and cell nest size for squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Jesinghaus M; Strehl J; Boxberg M; Brühl F; Wenzel A; Konukiewitz B; Schlitter AM; Steiger K; Warth A; Schnelzer A; Kiechle M; Beckmann MW; Noske A; Hartmann A; Mehlhorn G; Koch MC; Weichert W
J Pathol Clin Res; 2018 Apr; 4(2):93-102. PubMed ID: 29665323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of grading of urothelial carcinoma on urine cytology: an analysis of interobserver and intraobserver agreement.
Reid MD; Osunkoya AO; Siddiqui MT; Looney SW
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2012; 5(9):882-91. PubMed ID: 23119105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Tumor Budding and Cell Nest Size Are Highly Prognostic in Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Further Evidence for a Unified Histopathologic Grading System for Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Upper Aerodigestive Tract.
Boxberg M; Kuhn PH; Reiser M; Erb A; Steiger K; Pickhard A; Straßen U; Koob I; Kolk A; Warth A; Jesinghaus M; Weichert W
Am J Surg Pathol; 2019 Mar; 43(3):303-313. PubMed ID: 30475254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Novel Grading System Based on Tumor Budding and Cell Nest Size Is a Strong Predictor of Patient Outcome in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Jesinghaus M; Boxberg M; Konukiewitz B; Slotta-Huspenina J; Schlitter AM; Steiger K; Specht K; Wieczorek K; Warth A; Schmidt T; Hartmann A; Demir IE; Feith M; Ott K; Weichert W
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Aug; 41(8):1112-1120. PubMed ID: 28505009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Proposal to Revise the Histopathologic Grading System of Early Oral Tongue Cancer Incorporating Tumor Budding.
Elseragy A; Salo T; Coletta RD; Kowalski LP; Haglund C; Nieminen P; Mäkitie AA; Leivo I; Almangush A
Am J Surg Pathol; 2019 May; 43(5):703-709. PubMed ID: 30829728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of Fuhrman and modified Fuhrman grading systems for conventional renal cell carcinoma.
Bektas S; Bahadir B; Kandemir NO; Barut F; Gul AE; Ozdamar SO
Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2009 Nov; 25(11):596-600. PubMed ID: 19858038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic significance and interobserver variability of histologic grading systems for endometrial carcinoma.
Scholten AN; Smit VT; Beerman H; van Putten WL; Creutzberg CL
Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 14770433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multicenter determination of optimal interobserver agreement using the Fuhrman grading system for renal cell carcinoma: Assessment of 241 patients with > 15-year follow-up.
Lang H; Lindner V; de Fromont M; Molinié V; Letourneux H; Meyer N; Martin M; Jacqmin D
Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 15611969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. New Histopathologic Risk Model for Early T-stage Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Focusing on a Modified Worst Pattern of Invasion System and a New Tumor Budding Score.
Chang HY; Hang JF; Kuo YJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 2024 Jan; 48(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 37779502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interobserver Variation Among Pathologists in Evaluating Perineural Invasion for Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Chi AC; Katabi N; Chen HS; Cheng YL
Head Neck Pathol; 2016 Dec; 10(4):451-464. PubMed ID: 27140176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic Performance and Reproducibility of the 1973 and 2004/2016 World Health Organization Grading Classification Systems in Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A European Association of Urology Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Systematic Review.
Soukup V; Čapoun O; Cohen D; Hernández V; Babjuk M; Burger M; Compérat E; Gontero P; Lam T; MacLennan S; Mostafid AH; Palou J; van Rhijn BWG; Rouprêt M; Shariat SF; Sylvester R; Yuan Y; Zigeuner R
Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):801-813. PubMed ID: 28457661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer.
Ozkan TA; Eruyar AT; Cebeci OO; Memik O; Ozcan L; Kuskonmaz I
Scand J Urol; 2016 Dec; 50(6):420-424. PubMed ID: 27416104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interobserver variability in breast carcinoma grading results in prognostic stage differences.
Rabe K; Snir OL; Bossuyt V; Harigopal M; Celli R; Reisenbichler ES
Hum Pathol; 2019 Dec; 94():51-57. PubMed ID: 31655171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 18F-FDG PET in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx: a study on inter- and intraobserver agreement.
Krabbe CA; Pruim J; Scholtens AM; Roodenburg JL; Brouwers AH; Phan TT; Agool A; Dijkstra PU
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 68(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 20006150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
