187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30534038)
1. The effect of three lining materials on microleakage of packable composite resin restorations in young premolars with cavity margins located on enamel and dentin/cementum - An
Rizk HM; Al-Ruthea M; Habibullah MA
Int J Health Sci (Qassim); 2018; 12(6):8-17. PubMed ID: 30534038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of class II packable composite resin restorations using flowable composite and resin modified glass ionomers as intermediate layers.
Majety KK; Pujar M
J Conserv Dent; 2011 Oct; 14(4):414-7. PubMed ID: 22144815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of flowable materials on the microleakage of Class II composite restorations that extend apical to the cemento-enamel junction.
Sadeghi M; Lynch CD
Oper Dent; 2009; 34(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 19544820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners.
Leevailoj C; Cochran MA; Matis BA; Moore BK; Platt JA
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 11357574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of an intermediate layer of flowable composite resin on microleakage in packable composite restorations.
Ziskind D; Adell I; Teperovich E; Peretz B
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2005 Sep; 15(5):349-54. PubMed ID: 16128999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Microleakage in Class II Cavities using Packable Composite Restorations with and without use of Liners.
Arora R; Kapur R; Sibal N; Juneja S
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012 Sep; 5(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 25206164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the cervical integrity during occlusal loading of Class II restorations.
Campos PE; Barceleiro Mde O; Sampaio-Filho HR; Martins LR
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18335734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microleakage of Class II packable resin composites lined with flowables: an in vitro study.
Neme AM; Maxson BB; Pink FE; Aksu MN
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):600-5. PubMed ID: 12413226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of different periods of enamel microabrasion on the microleakage of class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations: An
Bansal D; Mahajan M
Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(6):675-680. PubMed ID: 29256469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of flowable materials on microleakage of nanofilled and hybrid Class II composite restorations with LED and QTH LCUs.
Sadeghi M
Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 19553715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of flowable resin composite in reducing microleakage - an in vitro study.
Lokhande NA; Padmai AS; Rathore VP; Shingane S; Jayashankar DN; Sharma U
J Int Oral Health; 2014 Jun; 6(3):111-4. PubMed ID: 25083045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.
Aranha AC; Pimenta LA
Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An in vitro microleakage study of class V cavities restored with a new self-adhesive flowable composite resin versus different flowable materials.
Sadeghi M
Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2012 Jul; 9(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 23162589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of eccentric load cycling on microleakage of Class V flowable and packable composite resin restorations.
Jang KT; Chung DH; Shin D; García-Godoy F
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(6):603-8. PubMed ID: 11699185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of microleakage in posterior nanocomposite restorations with adhesive liners.
Simi B; Suprabha B
J Conserv Dent; 2011 Apr; 14(2):178-81. PubMed ID: 21814362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
Payne JH
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
