175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30537823)
1. Rigorous Free Energy Perturbation Approach to Estimating Relative Binding Affinities between Ligands with Multiple Protonation and Tautomeric States.
de Oliveira C; Yu HS; Chen W; Abel R; Wang L
J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Jan; 15(1):424-435. PubMed ID: 30537823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multistate Method to Efficiently Account for Tautomerism and Protonation in Alchemical Free-Energy Calculations.
Champion C; Hünenberger PH; Riniker S
J Chem Theory Comput; 2024 May; 20(10):4350-4362. PubMed ID: 38742760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simple, intuitive calculations of free energy of binding for protein-ligand complexes. 2. Computational titration and pH effects in molecular models of neuraminidase-inhibitor complexes.
Fornabaio M; Cozzini P; Mozzarelli A; Abraham DJ; Kellogg GE
J Med Chem; 2003 Oct; 46(21):4487-500. PubMed ID: 14521411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correction to "Rigorous Free Energy Perturbation Approach to Estimating Relative Binding Affinities between Ligands with Multiple Protonation and Tautomeric States".
de Oliveira C; Yu HS; Chen W; Abel R; Wang L
J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Oct; 15(10):5758. PubMed ID: 31550159
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations with FEP.
Wang L; Chambers J; Abel R
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2022():201-232. PubMed ID: 31396905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of variations of ligand protonation and tautomerism on protein-ligand recognition and binding energy landscape.
Todorov NP; Monthoux PH; Alberts IL
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(3):1134-42. PubMed ID: 16711733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of tautomeric and protomeric binding modes by free energy calculations. A case study for the structure based optimization of D-amino acid oxidase inhibitors.
Orgován Z; Ferenczy GG; Steinbrecher T; Szilágyi B; Bajusz D; Keserű GM
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Feb; 32(2):331-345. PubMed ID: 29335871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accurate Modeling of Scaffold Hopping Transformations in Drug Discovery.
Wang L; Deng Y; Wu Y; Kim B; LeBard DN; Wandschneider D; Beachy M; Friesner RA; Abel R
J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Jan; 13(1):42-54. PubMed ID: 27933808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Standard state free energies, not pK
Gunner MR; Murakami T; Rustenburg AS; Işık M; Chodera JD
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 May; 34(5):561-573. PubMed ID: 32052350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using physics-based pose predictions and free energy perturbation calculations to predict binding poses and relative binding affinities for FXR ligands in the D3R Grand Challenge 2.
Athanasiou C; Vasilakaki S; Dellis D; Cournia Z
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):21-44. PubMed ID: 29119352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advances in binding free energies calculations: QM/MM-based free energy perturbation method for drug design.
Rathore RS; Sumakanth M; Reddy MS; Reddanna P; Rao AA; Erion MD; Reddy MR
Curr Pharm Des; 2013; 19(26):4674-86. PubMed ID: 23260025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accurate Calculation of Relative Binding Free Energies between Ligands with Different Net Charges.
Chen W; Deng Y; Russell E; Wu Y; Abel R; Wang L
J Chem Theory Comput; 2018 Dec; 14(12):6346-6358. PubMed ID: 30375870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Free energy calculations to estimate ligand-binding affinities in structure-based drug design.
Reddy MR; Reddy CR; Rathore RS; Erion MD; Aparoy P; Reddy RN; Reddanna P
Curr Pharm Des; 2014; 20(20):3323-37. PubMed ID: 23947646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Glycogen phosphorylase inhibitors: a free energy perturbation analysis of glucopyranose spirohydantoin analogues.
Archontis G; Watson KA; Xie Q; Andreou G; Chrysina ED; Zographos SE; Oikonomakos NG; Karplus M
Proteins; 2005 Dec; 61(4):984-98. PubMed ID: 16245298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Towards predictive ligand design with free-energy based computational methods?
Foloppe N; Hubbard R
Curr Med Chem; 2006; 13(29):3583-608. PubMed ID: 17168725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Free Energy Calculations for Protein-Ligand Binding Prediction.
Jespers W; Åqvist J; Gutiérrez-de-Terán H
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2266():203-226. PubMed ID: 33759129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accurate prediction of protonation state as a prerequisite for reliable MM-PB(GB)SA binding free energy calculations of HIV-1 protease inhibitors.
Wittayanarakul K; Hannongbua S; Feig M
J Comput Chem; 2008 Apr; 29(5):673-85. PubMed ID: 17849388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating the Roles of Protonation and Electronic Polarization in Absolute Binding Affinity Simulations.
King E; Qi R; Li H; Luo R; Aitchison E
J Chem Theory Comput; 2021 Apr; 17(4):2541-2555. PubMed ID: 33764050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Advancing Drug Discovery through Enhanced Free Energy Calculations.
Abel R; Wang L; Harder ED; Berne BJ; Friesner RA
Acc Chem Res; 2017 Jul; 50(7):1625-1632. PubMed ID: 28677954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The importance of protonation and tautomerization in relative binding affinity prediction: a comparison of AMBER TI and Schrödinger FEP.
Hu Y; Sherborne B; Lee TS; Case DA; York DM; Guo Z
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Jul; 30(7):533-9. PubMed ID: 27480697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
