These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30537869)

  • 1. An experimental investigation into the surface and hydrodynamic characteristics of marine coatings with mimicked hull roughness ranges.
    Yeginbayeva IA; Atlar M
    Biofouling; 2018 Oct; 34(9):1001-1019. PubMed ID: 30537869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of 'in-service' conditions - mimicked hull roughness ranges and biofilms - on the surface and the hydrodynamic characteristics of foul-release type coatings.
    Yeginbayeva IA; Atlar M; Turkmen S; Chen H
    Biofouling; 2020 Oct; 36(9):1074-1089. PubMed ID: 33291985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An experimental investigation of the frictional drag characteristics of nanostructured and fluorinated fouling-release coatings using an axisymmetric body.
    Atlar M; Unal B; Unal UO; Politis G; Martinelli E; Galli G; Davies C; Williams D
    Biofouling; 2013; 29(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 23194395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of biological development effects on drag forces of ceramic hull coating using Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes-based solver.
    Sanz DS; García S; Trueba A; Islam H; Soares CG
    Biofouling; 2023 Mar; 39(3):289-302. PubMed ID: 37154076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Environmentally benign sol-gel antifouling and foul-releasing coatings.
    Detty MR; Ciriminna R; Bright FV; Pagliaro M
    Acc Chem Res; 2014 Feb; 47(2):678-87. PubMed ID: 24397288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of hydrodynamic stress on the frictional drag of biofouling communities.
    Hunsucker JT; Hunsucker KZ; Gardner H; Swain G
    Biofouling; 2016 Nov; 32(10):1209-1221. PubMed ID: 27744722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diatom community structure on in-service cruise ship hulls.
    Hunsucker KZ; Koka A; Lund G; Swain G
    Biofouling; 2014 Oct; 30(9):1133-40. PubMed ID: 25377486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The measurement of the drag characteristics of tin-free self-polishing co-polymers and fouling release coatings using a rotor apparatus.
    Candries M; Atlar M; Mesbahi E; Pazouki K
    Biofouling; 2003 Apr; 19 Suppl():27-36. PubMed ID: 14618701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of diatomaceous biofilms on the frictional drag of fouling-release coatings.
    Schultz MP; Walker JM; Steppe CN; Flack KA
    Biofouling; 2015; 31(9-10):759-73. PubMed ID: 26652667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Roughness effects of diatomaceous slime fouling on turbulent boundary layer hydrodynamics.
    Murphy EAK; Barros JM; Schultz MP; Flack KA; Steppe CN; Reidenbach MA
    Biofouling; 2018 Oct; 34(9):976-988. PubMed ID: 30602310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of cleaning and repainting on the ship drag penalty.
    Utama IKAP; Nugroho B; Yusuf M; Prasetyo FA; Hakim ML; Suastika IK; Ganapathisubramani B; Hutchins N; Monty JP
    Biofouling; 2021 Apr; 37(4):372-386. PubMed ID: 34121514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frictional drag measurements of large-scale plates in an enhanced plane channel flowcell.
    Turkmen S; Atlar M; Yeginbayeva I; Benson S; Finlay JA; Clare AS
    Biofouling; 2020 Feb; 36(2):169-182. PubMed ID: 32233656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of hydrodynamic drag on experimental fouling-release surfaces, using rotating disks.
    Holm ER; Schultz MP; Haslbeck EG; Talbott WJ; Field AJ
    Biofouling; 2004; 20(4-5):219-26. PubMed ID: 15621643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of ship hull form on the resistance penalty from biofouling.
    Oliveira D; Larsson AI; Granhag L
    Biofouling; 2018 Mar; 34(3):262-272. PubMed ID: 29457754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An experimental test of stationary lay-up periods and simulated transit on biofouling accumulation and transfer on ships.
    Davidson IC; Smith G; Ashton GV; Ruiz GM; Scianni C
    Biofouling; 2020 Apr; 36(4):455-466. PubMed ID: 32476480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards an absolute scale for adhesion strength of ship hull microfouling.
    Oliveira DR; Larsson L; Granhag L
    Biofouling; 2019 Feb; 35(2):244-258. PubMed ID: 30966794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Economic impact of biofouling on a naval surface ship.
    Schultz MP; Bendick JA; Holm ER; Hertel WM
    Biofouling; 2011 Jan; 27(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 21161774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biofilm community structure and the associated drag penalties of a groomed fouling release ship hull coating.
    Hunsucker KZ; Vora GJ; Hunsucker JT; Gardner H; Leary DH; Kim S; Lin B; Swain G
    Biofouling; 2018 Feb; 34(2):162-172. PubMed ID: 29347829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of long-term mechanical grooming on large-scale test panels coated with an antifouling and a fouling-release coating.
    Hearin J; Hunsucker KZ; Swain G; Stephens A; Gardner H; Lieberman K; Harper M
    Biofouling; 2015; 31(8):625-38. PubMed ID: 26359541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of coating roughness and biofouling on ship resistance and powering.
    Schultz MP
    Biofouling; 2007; 23(5-6):331-41. PubMed ID: 17852068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.