These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30537876)
1. Patient-specific design process and evaluation of a hip prosthesis femoral stem. Abdelaal O; Darwish S; El-Hofy H; Saito Y Int J Artif Organs; 2019 Jun; 42(6):271-290. PubMed ID: 30537876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stem geometry changes initial femoral fixation stability of a revised press-fit hip prosthesis: A finite element study. Russell RD; Huo MH; Rodrigues DC; Kosmopoulos V Technol Health Care; 2016 Nov; 24(6):865-872. PubMed ID: 27434281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Design process of cementless femoral stem using a nonlinear three dimensional finite element analysis. Baharuddin MY; Salleh ShH; Zulkifly AH; Lee MH; Noor AM; A Harris AR; Majid NA; Abd Kader AS BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Feb; 15():30. PubMed ID: 24484753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Metaphyseal anchoring short stem hip arthroplasty provides a more physiological load transfer: a comparative finite element analysis study. Yan SG; Chevalier Y; Liu F; Hua X; Schreiner A; Jansson V; Schmidutz F J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Oct; 15(1):498. PubMed ID: 33121506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Modified metaphyseal-loading anterolaterally flared anatomic femoral stem: five- to nine-year prospective follow-up evaluation and results of three-dimensional finite element analysis. Kokubo Y; Uchida K; Oki H; Negoro K; Nagamune K; Kawaguchi S; Takeno K; Yayama T; Nakajima H; Sugita D; Yoshida A; Baba H Artif Organs; 2013 Feb; 37(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 23009086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of the fixation region of a press-fit hip endoprosthesis on the stress-strain state of the "bone-implant" system. Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Goethel MF; Loskutov A Comput Biol Med; 2017 May; 84():195-204. PubMed ID: 28390287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses]. Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of stemmed and nonstemmed hip replacement on stress distribution of proximal femur and implant. Chen CM; Tsai WC; Lin SC; Tseng CS BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Sep; 15():312. PubMed ID: 25257699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Custom-designed orthopedic implants evaluated using finite element analysis of patient-specific computed tomography data: femoral-component case study. Harrysson OL; Hosni YA; Nayfeh JF BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2007 Sep; 8():91. PubMed ID: 17854508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis]. Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inter-subject variability effects on the primary stability of a short cementless femoral stem. Bah MT; Shi J; Heller MO; Suchier Y; Lefebvre F; Young P; King L; Dunlop DG; Boettcher M; Draper E; Browne M J Biomech; 2015 Apr; 48(6):1032-42. PubMed ID: 25724937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite Element Analysis of porously punched prosthetic short stem virtually designed for simulative uncemented Hip Arthroplasty. Peng MJ; Chen HY; Hu Y; Ju X; Bai B BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jul; 18(1):295. PubMed ID: 28693543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical Analysis to Probe Role of Bone Condition and Subject Weight in Stiffness Customization of Femoral Stem for Improved Periprosthetic Biomechanical Response. Chatterjee S; Roy S; Majumder S; RoyChowdhury A J Biomech Eng; 2020 Oct; 142(10):. PubMed ID: 32320044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of custom cementless stem using finite element analysis and elastic modulus distribution for reducing stress-shielding effect. Saravana Kumar G; George SP Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2017 Feb; 231(2):149-159. PubMed ID: 28056711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modular femoral sleeve and stem implant provides long-term total hip survivorship. Le D; Smith K; Tanzer D; Tanzer M Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Feb; 469(2):508-13. PubMed ID: 20809170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stress shielding effect after total hip arthroplasty varies between combinations of stem design and stiffness-a comparing biomechanical finite element analysis. Burchard R; Graw JA; Soost C; Schmitt J Int Orthop; 2023 Aug; 47(8):1981-1987. PubMed ID: 37269400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Finite element analysis on the hollow porous design at the proximal end of cementless femoral prosthesis stem. He S; Zhu J; Zhao J Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Sep; 22(9):1276-1280. PubMed ID: 31489866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Study of cellular femoral stem for stress shielding and interface stability. Rahmat N; Kadkhodapour J; Arbabtafti M Int J Artif Organs; 2023 Jun; 46(6):370-377. PubMed ID: 37070137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of necrotic lesion size and orientation of the femoral component on stress alterations in the proximal femur in hip resurfacing - a finite element simulation. Tai CL; Chen YC; Hsieh PH BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Aug; 15():262. PubMed ID: 25095740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]