1234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30537966)
1. Supra-costal tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy is not associated with increased complication rate: a prospective study of safety and efficacy of supra-costal versus sub-costal access.
Yan MY; Lin J; Chiang HC; Chen YL; Chen PH
BMC Urol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):112. PubMed ID: 30537966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Tubeless supra-costal percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with significantly less hydrothorax: a prospective randomized clinical study.
Goldberg H; Nevo A; Shtabholtz Y; Lubin M; Baniel J; Margel D; Ehrlich Y; Lifshitz D
BJU Int; 2020 Feb; 125(2):276-283. PubMed ID: 31721407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Upper pole urologist-obtained percutaneous renal access for PCNL is safe and efficacious.
Patel AP; Bui D; Pattaras J; Ogan K
Can J Urol; 2017 Apr; 24(2):8754-8758. PubMed ID: 28436364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Tubeless 24 F tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of renal and proximal ureteral calculi].
Xiong LL; Ye XJ; Ma K; Huang XB; Wang XF
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2013 Aug; 45(4):575-8. PubMed ID: 23939165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: a randomized, clinical trial.
Moosanejad N; Firouzian A; Hashemi SA; Bahari M; Fazli M
Braz J Med Biol Res; 2016; 49(4):e4878. PubMed ID: 27007650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of tubeless-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in treatment of upper-ureteral calculi sized ≥ 1.5 cm].
Zhang LJ; Ye XJ; Huang XB; Xiong LL; Ma K; Li JX; Wang XF
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Feb; 47(1):170-4. PubMed ID: 25686351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective feasibility study and review of previous reports.
Shah HN; Kausik VB; Hegde SS; Shah JN; Bansal MB
BJU Int; 2005 Oct; 96(6):879-83. PubMed ID: 16153222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Supracostal access: does it affect tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy efficacy and safety?
Jun-Ou J; Lojanapiwat B
Int Braz J Urol; 2010; 36(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 20450501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex renal stone disease: single center experience.
Malcolm JB; Derweesh IH; Brightbill EK; Mehrazin R; DiBlasio CJ; Wake RW
Can J Urol; 2008 Jun; 15(3):4072-6; discussion 4076-7. PubMed ID: 18570711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy for upper pole renal stone using subcostal access.
Aghamir SM; Modaresi SS; Aloosh M; Tajik A
J Endourol; 2011 Apr; 25(4):583-6. PubMed ID: 21381953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Questioning the wisdom of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a prospective randomized controlled study of early tube removal vs tubeless PCNL.
Mishra S; Sabnis RB; Kurien A; Ganpule A; Muthu V; Desai M
BJU Int; 2010 Oct; 106(7):1045-8; discussion 1048-9. PubMed ID: 20151965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety and Effectiveness of Externalized Ureteral Catheter in Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.
Raharja PAR; Atmoko W; Rasyid N; Birowo P
Urol J; 2019 Aug; 17(5):456-461. PubMed ID: 31422576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs standard PCNL for management of renal stones in the flank-free modified supine position: single-center experience.
Sakr A; Salem E; Kamel M; Desoky E; Ragab A; Omran M; Fawzi A; Shahin A
Urolithiasis; 2017 Dec; 45(6):585-589. PubMed ID: 28229197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Chen ZJ; Yan YJ; Zhou JJ
Asian J Surg; 2020 Jan; 43(1):60-68. PubMed ID: 30782495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Totally tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: analysis of clinical outcomes and cost.
Choi SW; Kim KS; Kim JH; Park YH; Bae WJ; Hong SH; Lee JY; Kim SW; Hwang TK; Cho HJ
J Endourol; 2014 Dec; 28(12):1487-94. PubMed ID: 25177908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Supracostal access tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: minimizing complications.
Sourial MW; Francois N; Box GN; Knudsen BE
World J Urol; 2019 Jul; 37(7):1429-1433. PubMed ID: 30302593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two different renal access techniques in one-stage percutaneous nephrolithotomy: triangulation versus eye of the needle.
Budak S; Yucel C; Kisa E; Kozacioglu Z
Ann Saudi Med; 2018; 38(3):189-193. PubMed ID: 29848936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mini vs standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: a comparative study.
ElSheemy MS; Elmarakbi AA; Hytham M; Ibrahim H; Khadgi S; Al-Kandari AM
Urolithiasis; 2019 Apr; 47(2):207-214. PubMed ID: 29549382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Percutaneous stone surgery using a tubeless technique with fibrin sealant: report of our first 107 cases.
Gudeman SR; Stroup SP; Durbin JM; Patino G; L'Esperance JO; Auge BK
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E1048-52. PubMed ID: 23046063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Upper pole access is safe and effective for pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Oner S; Karagozlu Akgul A; Demirbas M; Onen E; Aydos M; Erdogan A
J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Apr; 14(2):183.e1-183.e8. PubMed ID: 29459134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
