451 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30538086)
1. Continuous Versus Intermittent Vital Signs Monitoring Using a Wearable, Wireless Patch in Patients Admitted to Surgical Wards: Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.
Downey C; Randell R; Brown J; Jayne DG
J Med Internet Res; 2018 Dec; 20(12):e10802. PubMed ID: 30538086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trial of remote continuous versus intermittent NEWS monitoring after major surgery (TRaCINg): a feasibility randomised controlled trial.
Downey CL; Croft J; Ainsworth G; Buckley H; Shinkins B; Randell R; Brown JM; Jayne DG
Pilot Feasibility Stud; 2020 Nov; 6(1):183. PubMed ID: 33292669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of a wearable wireless patch for continuous remote monitoring of vital signs in patients recovering from major surgery: a clinical validation study from the TRaCINg trial.
Downey C; Ng S; Jayne D; Wong D
BMJ Open; 2019 Aug; 9(8):e031150. PubMed ID: 31420399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trial of Remote Continuous versus Intermittent NEWS monitoring after major surgery (TRaCINg): protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial.
Downey CL; Croft J; Buckley H; Randell R; Brown JM; Jayne DG
Pilot Feasibility Stud; 2018; 4():112. PubMed ID: 29992041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of wireless monitoring using a wearable patch sensor in high-risk surgical patients at a step-down unit in the Netherlands: a clinical validation study.
Breteler MJM; Huizinga E; van Loon K; Leenen LPH; Dohmen DAJ; Kalkman CJ; Blokhuis TJ
BMJ Open; 2018 Feb; 8(2):e020162. PubMed ID: 29487076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Practical Considerations and Successful Implementation of Vital Signs Monitoring. Comment on "Continuous Versus Intermittent Vital Signs Monitoring Using a Wearable, Wireless Patch in Patients Admitted to Surgical Wards: Pilot Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial".
Walsh C; Zargaran D; Patel N; White A; Koumpa FS; Tanna R; Ashraf MA
J Med Internet Res; 2021 Mar; 23(3):e14042. PubMed ID: 33704079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost utility analysis of continuous and intermittent versus intermittent vital signs monitoring in patients admitted to surgical wards.
Javanbakht M; Mashayekhi A; Trevor M; Rezaei Hemami M; L Downey C; Branagan-Harris M; Atkinson J
J Med Econ; 2020 Jul; 23(7):728-736. PubMed ID: 32212979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Current Evidence for Continuous Vital Signs Monitoring by Wearable Wireless Devices in Hospitalized Adults: Systematic Review.
Leenen JPL; Leerentveld C; van Dijk JD; van Westreenen HL; Schoonhoven L; Patijn GA
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e18636. PubMed ID: 32469323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Continuous Monitoring of Vital Signs in the General Ward Using Wearable Devices: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Weenk M; Bredie SJ; Koeneman M; Hesselink G; van Goor H; van de Belt TH
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e15471. PubMed ID: 32519972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient attitudes towards remote continuous vital signs monitoring on general surgery wards: An interview study.
Downey CL; Brown JM; Jayne DG; Randell R
Int J Med Inform; 2018 Jun; 114():52-56. PubMed ID: 29673603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Testing effectiveness of the revised Cape Town modified early warning and SBAR systems: a pilot pragmatic parallel group randomised controlled trial.
Kyriacos U; Burger D; Jordan S
Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):809. PubMed ID: 31888745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of wearable wireless continuous vital sign monitoring in abdominal surgical patients: before-after study.
Leenen JPL; Ardesch V; Kalkman CJ; Schoonhoven L; Patijn GA
BJS Open; 2024 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 38235573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effectiveness of continuous or intermittent vital signs monitoring in preventing adverse events on general wards: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cardona-Morrell M; Prgomet M; Turner RM; Nicholson M; Hillman K
Int J Clin Pract; 2016 Oct; 70(10):806-824. PubMed ID: 27582503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility of wireless continuous monitoring of vital signs without using alarms on a general surgical ward: A mixed methods study.
Leenen JPL; Rasing HJM; van Dijk JD; Kalkman CJ; Schoonhoven L; Patijn GA
PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0265435. PubMed ID: 35286354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Chest Patch for Continuous Vital Sign Monitoring: Clinical Validation Study During Movement and Controlled Hypoxia.
Morgado Areia C; Santos M; Vollam S; Pimentel M; Young L; Roman C; Ede J; Piper P; King E; Gustafson O; Harford M; Shah A; Tarassenko L; Watkinson P
J Med Internet Res; 2021 Sep; 23(9):e27547. PubMed ID: 34524087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Are current wireless monitoring systems capable of detecting adverse events in high-risk surgical patients? A descriptive study.
Breteler MJM; KleinJan E; Numan L; Ruurda JP; Van Hillegersberg R; Leenen LPH; Hermans M; Kalkman CJ; Blokhuis TJ
Injury; 2020 May; 51 Suppl 2():S97-S105. PubMed ID: 31761422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wearable sensors to improve detection of patient deterioration.
Joshi M; Ashrafian H; Aufegger L; Khan S; Arora S; Cooke G; Darzi A
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2019 Feb; 16(2):145-154. PubMed ID: 30580650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wireless and continuous monitoring of vital signs in patients at the general ward.
Weenk M; Koeneman M; van de Belt TH; Engelen LJLPG; van Goor H; Bredie SJH
Resuscitation; 2019 Mar; 136():47-53. PubMed ID: 30685546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Remote wireless vital signs monitoring on the ward for early detection of deteriorating patients: A case series.
Posthuma LM; Downey C; Visscher MJ; Ghazali DA; Joshi M; Ashrafian H; Khan S; Darzi A; Goldstone J; Preckel B
Int J Nurs Stud; 2020 Apr; 104():103515. PubMed ID: 32105974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
