These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30539854)

  • 1. Evaluation of electron dose calculations accuracy of a treatment planning system in radiotherapy of breast cancer with photon-electron technique.
    Toossi MTB; Soleymanifard S; Farhood B; Farkhari A; Knaup C
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2018 Dec; 14(Supplement):S1110-S1116. PubMed ID: 30539854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment the accuracy of dose calculation in build-up region for two radiotherapy treatment planning systems.
    Farhood B; Bahreyni Toossi MT; Ghorbani M; Salari E; Knaup C
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2017; 13(6):968-973. PubMed ID: 29237961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of accuracy of out-of-field dose calculations by TiGRT treatment planning system in radiotherapy.
    Bahreyni Toossi MT; Soleymanifard S; Farhood B; Mohebbi S; Davenport D
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(3):634-639. PubMed ID: 29893331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of dose calculations accuracy of a commercial treatment planning system for the head and neck region in radiotherapy.
    Bahreyni Toossi MT; Farhood B; Soleymanifard S
    Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2017; 22(5):420-427. PubMed ID: 28855853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
    Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dose perturbation due to dental amalgam in the head and neck radiotherapy: A phantom study.
    Saadatmand P; Amouheidari A; Shanei A; Abedi I
    Med Dosim; 2020 Summer; 45(2):128-133. PubMed ID: 31537421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Total body irradiation, toward optimal individual delivery: dose evaluation with metal oxide field effect transistors, thermoluminescence detectors, and a treatment planning system.
    Bloemen-van Gurp EJ; Mijnheer BJ; Verschueren TA; Lambin P
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Nov; 69(4):1297-304. PubMed ID: 17881143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dosimetry of MammoSite® applicator: comparison between Monte Carlo simulation, measurements, and treatment planning calculation.
    Oshaghi M; Sadeghi M; Mahdavi SR; Shirazi A
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2013; 9(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 23771363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation in the build-up region of the tangential field of the breast for a radiotherapy treatment planning system.
    Farhood B; Bahreyni Toossi MT; Soleymanifard S; Mortezazadeh T
    Contemp Oncol (Pozn); 2017; 21(3):232-239. PubMed ID: 29180932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dosimetry audit of radiotherapy treatment planning systems.
    Bulski W; Chełmiński K; Rostkowska J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):472-6. PubMed ID: 25848119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of two commercial electron beam algorithms over regions close to the lung-mediastinum interface, against Monte Carlo simulation and point dosimetry in virtual and anthropomorphic phantoms.
    Ojala J; Hyödynmaa S; Barańczyk R; Góra E; Waligórski MP
    Phys Med; 2014 Mar; 30(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 23702438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monte Carlo study of TLD measurements in air cavities.
    Haraldsson P; Knöös T; Nyström H; Engström P
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(18):N253-9. PubMed ID: 14529213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Linac-based isocentric electron-photon treatment of radically operated breast carcinoma with enhanced dose uniformity in the field gap area.
    Tenhunen M; Nyman H; Strengell S; Vaalavirta L
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 19433339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the photon dose calculation accuracy in radiation therapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma.
    Mahmoudi G; Farhood B; Shokrani P; Amouheidari A; Atarod M
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(5):1029-1035. PubMed ID: 30197343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing the accuracy of four-dimensional photon dose calculations with three-dimensional calculations using moving and deforming phantoms.
    Vinogradskiy YY; Balter P; Followill DS; Alvarez PE; White RA; Starkschall G
    Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5000-6. PubMed ID: 19994509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implementation of the validation testing in MPPG 5.a "Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations-megavoltage photon and electron beams".
    Jacqmin DJ; Bredfeldt JS; Frigo SP; Smilowitz JB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):115-127. PubMed ID: 28291929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
    Rana S; Zheng Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dosimetric verification of lung phantom calculated by collapsed cone convolution: A Monte Carlo and experimental evaluation.
    Najafzadeh M; Nickfarjam A; Jabbari K; Markel D; Chow JCL; Takabi FS
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(1):161-175. PubMed ID: 30614811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement and modeling of out-of-field doses from various advanced post-mastectomy radiotherapy techniques.
    Yoon J; Heins D; Zhao X; Sanders M; Zhang R
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Nov; 62(23):9039-9053. PubMed ID: 29048329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Verification of tangential breast treatment dose calculations in a commercial 3D treatment planning system.
    Baird CT; Starkschall G; Liu HH; Buchholz TA; Hogstrom KR
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2001; 2(2):73-84. PubMed ID: 11604052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.