BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3054000)

  • 1. Estimation of test error rates, disease prevalence and relative risk from misclassified data: a review.
    Walter SD; Irwig LM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1988; 41(9):923-37. PubMed ID: 3054000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of ordinal categorical data with misclassification.
    Poon WY; Wang HB
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):17-42. PubMed ID: 19364445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy: A "Rule of Three" for data with repeated observations but without a gold standard.
    Walter SD
    Stat Med; 2021 Sep; 40(22):4815-4829. PubMed ID: 34161623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential misclassification arising from nondifferential errors in exposure measurement.
    Flegal KM; Keyl PM; Nieto FJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 1991 Nov; 134(10):1233-44. PubMed ID: 1746532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attribute frequency and misclassification bias.
    Sosenko JM; Gardner LB
    J Chronic Dis; 1987; 40(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 3818875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence.
    Brenner H; Gefeller O
    Stat Med; 1997 May; 16(9):981-91. PubMed ID: 9160493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adjustment for non-differential misclassification error in the generalized linear model.
    Liu XH; Liang KY
    Stat Med; 1991 Aug; 10(8):1197-211. PubMed ID: 1925152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal designs of two-stage studies for estimation of sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value.
    McNamee R
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(23):3609-25. PubMed ID: 12436459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A review of methods for misclassified categorical data in epidemiology.
    Chen TT
    Stat Med; 1989 Sep; 8(9):1095-106; discussion 1107-8. PubMed ID: 2678350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accounting for error due to misclassification of exposures in case-control studies of gene-environment interaction.
    Zhang L; Mukherjee B; Ghosh M; Gruber S; Moreno V
    Stat Med; 2008 Jul; 27(15):2756-83. PubMed ID: 17879261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binary regression with differentially misclassified response and exposure variables.
    Tang L; Lyles RH; King CC; Celentano DD; Lo Y
    Stat Med; 2015 Apr; 34(9):1605-20. PubMed ID: 25652841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prevalence estimation subject to misclassification: the mis-substitution bias and some remedies.
    Zhang Z; Liu C; Kim S; Liu A
    Stat Med; 2014 Nov; 33(25):4482-500. PubMed ID: 25043925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A practical approach to estimating the true effect of exposure despite imprecise exposure classification.
    Weinkam JJ; Rosenbaum WL; Sterling TD
    Am J Ind Med; 1991; 19(5):587-601. PubMed ID: 2053577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating the polychoric correlation from misclassified data.
    Yiu CF; Poon WY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):49-74. PubMed ID: 18482475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating a Logistic Discrimination Functions When One of the Training Samples Is Subject to Misclassification: A Maximum Likelihood Approach.
    Nagelkerke N; Fidler V
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140718. PubMed ID: 26474313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of predictive value to adjust relative risk estimates biased by misclassification of outcome status.
    Green MS
    Am J Epidemiol; 1983 Jan; 117(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 6823958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accounting for independent nondifferential misclassification does not increase certainty that an observed association is in the correct direction.
    Greenland S; Gustafson P
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 164(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 16641307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expected estimating equations for missing data, measurement error, and misclassification, with application to longitudinal nonignorable missing data.
    Wang CY; Huang Y; Chao EC; Jeffcoat MK
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 17608787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A hidden Markov model approach to analyze longitudinal ternary outcomes when some observed states are possibly misclassified.
    Benoit JS; Chan W; Luo S; Yeh HW; Doody R
    Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1549-57. PubMed ID: 26782946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.