435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30541657)
1. Application of Wireless Contralateral Routing of Signal Technology in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Users with Bilateral Profound Hearing Loss.
Snapp HA; Hoffer ME; Spahr A; Rajguru S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):579-589. PubMed ID: 30541657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness in Rehabilitation of Current Wireless CROS Technology in Experienced Bone-Anchored Implant Users.
Snapp HA; Hoffer ME; Liu X; Rajguru SM
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):1397-1404. PubMed ID: 29135863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Speech-in-Noise and Localization Benefits in Unilateral Hearing Loss Subjects Using Contralateral Routing of Signal Hearing Aids or Bone-Anchored Implants.
Snapp HA; Holt FD; Liu X; Rajguru SM
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jan; 38(1):11-18. PubMed ID: 27846038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contralateral Routing of Signal Yields Significant Speech in Noise Benefit for Unilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Dwyer RT; Kessler D; Butera IM; Gifford RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):235-242. PubMed ID: 30461413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Benefit of a Wireless Contralateral Routing of Signals (CROS) Microphone in Unilateral Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Kurien G; Hwang E; Smilsky K; Smith L; Lin VYW; Nedzelski J; Chen JM
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e82-e88. PubMed ID: 30570612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rerouting Hearing Aid Systems for Overcoming Simulated Unilateral Hearing in Dynamic Listening Situations.
Picou EM; Lewis D; Angley G; Tharpe AM
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):790-803. PubMed ID: 31584502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Hearing Device Use on Speech-in-Noise Performance in Children with Severe-to-Profound Unilateral Hearing Loss.
Griffin AM; Atri A; Licameli G; Stiles DJ
Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):588-602. PubMed ID: 36575571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech Recognition in Noise in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Recipients Using Digital Remote Wireless Microphone Technology.
Wesarg T; Arndt S; Wiebe K; Schmid F; Huber A; Mülder HE; Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Speck I
J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):607-618. PubMed ID: 30430986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness.
Niparko JK; Cox KM; Lustig LR
Otol Neurotol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 12544032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sound Localization and Speech Perception in Noise of Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Bimodal Fitting Versus Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Choi JE; Moon IJ; Kim EY; Park HS; Kim BK; Chung WH; Cho YS; Brown CJ; Hong SH
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):426-440. PubMed ID: 28085740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Residual Hearing Affects Contralateral Routing of Signals in Cochlear Implant Users.
Stronks HC; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 33849023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The addition of a contralateral microphone for unilateral cochlear implant users: not an alternative for bilateral cochlear implantation.
van Loon MC; Goverts ST; Merkus P; Hensen EF; Smits C
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Oct; 35(9):e233-9. PubMed ID: 25226266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a wireless contralateral routing of signal (CROS) device with the Advanced Bionics Naída CI Q90 sound processor.
Ernst A; Baumgaertel RM; Diez A; Battmer RD
Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Jul; 20(4):182-189. PubMed ID: 30821202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Value of Unilateral CIs, CI-CROS and Bilateral CIs, with and without Beamformer Microphones, for Speech Understanding in a Simulation of a Restaurant Environment.
Dorman MF; Cook Natale S; Agrawal S
Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(5):270-276. PubMed ID: 30537753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Binaural Optimization of Cochlear Implants: Discarding Frequency Content Without Sacrificing Head-Shadow Benefit.
Sheffield SW; Goupell MJ; Spencer NJ; Stakhovskaya OA; Bernstein JGW
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):576-590. PubMed ID: 31436754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benefits of Bilateral Hearing on the Telephone for Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Miller S; Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Agrawal S; Koch D; Neumann S
J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):180-185. PubMed ID: 33873219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study.
Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Arcaroli J; Sammeth C
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):714-31. PubMed ID: 17086081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Benefit of a contralateral routing of signal device for unilateral cochlear implant users.
Weder S; Kompis M; Caversaccio M; Stieger C
Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 25501444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
