These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30541708)

  • 1. Comparison of a Traditional and Novel Evoked Compound Action Potentials Recording Approach and Evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses in Pediatric Cochlear Implants Users.
    Garrido LC; Schwarz K; Lauss K; Vernetta CP; Kontides A; Gomez MD; Calvete AG; Carceller MA
    J Int Adv Otol; 2018 Dec; 14(3):353-358. PubMed ID: 30541708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a battery of behavioral and objective measures to achieve optimal cochlear implant stimulation levels in children.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):447-63. PubMed ID: 15599192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of automated and traditional ECAP recording approaches in clinical practice.
    Estienne P; Scaglia A; Kontides A; Lauss K; Schwarz K; Arauz SL
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Jul; 61(7):583-591. PubMed ID: 34187279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Activity-dependent developmental plasticity of the auditory brain stem in children who use cochlear implants.
    Gordon KA; Papsin BC; Harrison RV
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):485-500. PubMed ID: 14663348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Usefulness of measuring electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in children with inner ear malformations during cochlear implantation.
    Minami SB; Takegoshi H; Shinjo Y; Enomoto C; Kaga K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2015; 135(10):1007-15. PubMed ID: 26062093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
    van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrically evoked amplitude modulation following response in cochlear implant candidates: comparison with auditory nerve response telemetry, subjective electrical stimulation, and speech perception.
    Hirschfelder A; Gräbel S; Olze H
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):968-75. PubMed ID: 22772009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
    Telmesani LM; Said NM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Postoperative objective detecting techniques for cochlear implant children with inner ear malformation.
    Qiao XF; Li X; Zhang QW; Li TL; Wang D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 102():1-6. PubMed ID: 29106852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characteristics of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in patients with cochlear nerve canal stenosis receiving cochlear implants.
    Wang Z; Liu Y; Wang L; Shen X; Han S; Wang W; Gao F; Liang W; Peng KA
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jan; 104():98-103. PubMed ID: 29287891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing eSRT and eCAP measurements in pediatric MED-EL cochlear implant users.
    Kosaner J; Spitzer P; Bayguzina S; Gultekin M; Behar LA
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):153-161. PubMed ID: 29291688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochlear implantation in auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders: role of transtympanic electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses and serial neural response telemetry.
    Dutt SN; Kumar A; Mittal AA; Vadlamani S; Gaur SK
    J Laryngol Otol; 2021 Jul; 135(7):602-609. PubMed ID: 34011420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationships between electrically evoked potentials and loudness growth in bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Kirby B; Brown C; Abbas P; Etler C; O'Brien S
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):389-98. PubMed ID: 22246138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Measurement of electrical evoked middle latency response in cochlear implantation operation].
    Wang B; Cao KL; Wang Y; Lu Y
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 22805019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
    Videhult Pierre P; Eklöf M; Smeds H; Asp F
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 31846976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the MED-EL standard electrode array.
    Brill S; Müller J; Hagen R; Möltner A; Brockmeier SJ; Stark T; Helbig S; Maurer J; Zahnert T; Zierhofer C; Nopp P; Anderson I; Strahl S
    Biomed Eng Online; 2009 Dec; 8():40. PubMed ID: 20015362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitative analysis of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in implanted children with auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony.
    Runge-Samuelson CL; Drake S; Wackym PA
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 18025997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of intra- versus post-operatively acquired electrically evoked compound action potentials.
    van Wermeskerken GK; van Olphen AF; van Zanten GA
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Oct; 45(10):589-94. PubMed ID: 17062500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evoked potentials in the rehabilitation of the patients after cochlear implantation].
    Chugunova TI; Zherenkova VV; Goyhburg MV; Potalova LA; Mosin VV; Bakhshinyan VV; Tavartkiladze GA
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2018; 83(4):21-25. PubMed ID: 30113575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Site of prelingual cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials and refractory using the Nucleus 24 standard].
    Ma RY; Li W; Jiang XJ
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Dec; 30(23):1854-1858. PubMed ID: 29798012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.