These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30541914)

  • 1. The Role of Meaning in Visual Memory: Face-Selective Brain Activity Predicts Memory for Ambiguous Face Stimuli.
    Brady TF; Alvarez GA; Störmer VS
    J Neurosci; 2019 Feb; 39(6):1100-1108. PubMed ID: 30541914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Encoding of faces and objects into visual working memory: an event-related brain potential study.
    Meinhardt-Injac B; Persike M; Berti S
    Neuroreport; 2013 Sep; 24(13):735-40. PubMed ID: 23921593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The activation of visual memory for facial identity is task-dependent: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Zimmermann FG; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2014 May; 54():124-34. PubMed ID: 24657481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Holistic face perception is impaired in developmental prosopagnosia.
    Towler J; Fisher K; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2018 Nov; 108():112-126. PubMed ID: 30165324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Electrophysiological evidence for parts and wholes in visual face memory.
    Towler J; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2016 Oct; 83():246-58. PubMed ID: 27614900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Larger images are better remembered during naturalistic encoding.
    Masarwa S; Kreichman O; Gilaie-Dotan S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jan; 119(4):. PubMed ID: 35046050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structural encoding processes contribute to individual differences in face and object cognition: Inferences from psychometric test performance and event-related brain potentials.
    Nowparast Rostami H; Sommer W; Zhou C; Wilhelm O; Hildebrandt A
    Cortex; 2017 Oct; 95():192-210. PubMed ID: 28915366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Categorical face perception in fish: How a fish brain warps reality to dissociate "same" from "different".
    Parker AN; Wallis GM; Obergrussberger R; Siebeck UE
    J Comp Neurol; 2020 Dec; 528(17):2919-2928. PubMed ID: 32406088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parametric study of EEG sensitivity to phase noise during face processing.
    Rousselet GA; Pernet CR; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB
    BMC Neurosci; 2008 Oct; 9():98. PubMed ID: 18834518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term information and distributed neural activation are relevant for the "internal features advantage" in face processing: electrophysiological and source reconstruction evidence.
    Olivares EI; Saavedra C; Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Iglesias J
    Cortex; 2013; 49(10):2735-47. PubMed ID: 24025156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deficient cortical face-sensitive N170 responses and basic visual processing in schizophrenia.
    Maher S; Mashhoon Y; Ekstrom T; Lukas S; Chen Y
    Schizophr Res; 2016 Jan; 170(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 26690888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrophysiological distinctions between recognition memory with and without awareness.
    Ko PC; Duda B; Hussey EP; Ally BA
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):642-55. PubMed ID: 23287567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between perceptual priming and subsequent recognition memory: an event-related potential study.
    Li B; Jiang L
    Neuroreport; 2020 Dec; 31(17):1175-1179. PubMed ID: 33044325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Face perception in the mind's eye.
    Righart R; Burra N; Vuilleumier P
    Brain Topogr; 2011 Mar; 24(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 21052814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Face identity matching is selectively impaired in developmental prosopagnosia.
    Fisher K; Towler J; Eimer M
    Cortex; 2017 Apr; 89():11-27. PubMed ID: 28189665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Disentangling the interaction of sex differences and hemispheric specialization for face processing - Evidence from ERPs.
    Stasch J; Mohr B; Neuhaus AH
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Jul; 136():144-150. PubMed ID: 29908225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attentional bias to affective faces and complex IAPS images in early visual cortex follows emotional cue extraction.
    Bekhtereva V; Craddock M; Müller MM
    Neuroimage; 2015 May; 112():254-266. PubMed ID: 25818682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early top-down control of visual processing predicts working memory performance.
    Rutman AM; Clapp WC; Chadick JZ; Gazzaley A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1224-34. PubMed ID: 19413473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Later but not early stages of familiar face recognition depend strongly on attentional resources: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Wiese H; Ingram BT; Elley ML; Tüttenberg SC; Burton AM; Young AW
    Cortex; 2019 Nov; 120():147-158. PubMed ID: 31310964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of imagery vividness and internally-directed attention on the neural mechanisms underlying the encoding of visual mental images into episodic memory.
    Gjorgieva E; Geib BR; Cabeza R; Woldorff MG
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 Mar; 33(6):3207-3220. PubMed ID: 35945684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.