These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30543705)

  • 1. Optimization of PET reconstruction algorithm, SUV thresholding algorithm and PET acquisition time in clinical 11C-acetate PET/CT.
    Strandberg S; Hashemi A; Axelsson J; Riklund K
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(12):e0209169. PubMed ID: 30543705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
    Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of reconstruction algorithms on semi-quantitative measurements in
    Özülker F; Babacan GB; Cengiz S; Özülker T
    Hell J Nucl Med; 2024; 27(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 39097805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance Characteristics of the Whole-Body Discovery IQ PET/CT System.
    Reynés-Llompart G; Gámez-Cenzano C; Romero-Zayas I; Rodríguez-Bel L; Vercher-Conejero JL; Martí-Climent JM
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Jul; 58(7):1155-1161. PubMed ID: 28302761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation and Optimization of a New PET Reconstruction Algorithm, Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction, for Lung Cancer Assessment According to Lesion Size.
    Otani T; Hosono M; Kanagaki M; Onishi Y; Matsubara N; Kawabata K; Kimura H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):W50-W56. PubMed ID: 30995096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Penalized-Likelihood Estimation Reconstruction on a Digital Time-of-Flight PET/CT Scanner for
    Lindström E; Sundin A; Trampal C; Lindsjö L; Ilan E; Danfors T; Antoni G; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 59(7):1152-1158. PubMed ID: 29449445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes of [
    Liu Y; Gao MJ; Zhou J; Du F; Chen L; Huang ZK; Hu JB; Lou C
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Sep; 21(1):133. PubMed ID: 34530768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does a novel penalized likelihood reconstruction of 18F-FDG PET-CT improve signal-to-background in colorectal liver metastases?
    Parvizi N; Franklin JM; McGowan DR; Teoh EJ; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 84(10):1873-8. PubMed ID: 26163992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of a deep learning enhancement method applied to PET images acquired with a reduced acquisition time.
    Ciborowski K; Gramek-Jedwabna A; Gołąb M; Miechowicz I; Szczurek J; Ruchała M; Czepczyński R
    Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur; 2023; 26(0):116-122. PubMed ID: 37786943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time-of-flight PET/CT using low-activity protocols: potential implications for cancer therapy monitoring.
    Murray I; Kalemis A; Glennon J; Hasan S; Quraishi S; Beyer T; Avril N
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 Aug; 37(9):1643-53. PubMed ID: 20428866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of different signal-to-background ratios on spatial resolution and F18-FDG-PET quantification using point spread function and time-of-flight reconstruction.
    Rogasch JM; Hofheinz F; Lougovski A; Furth C; Ruf J; Großer OS; Mohnike K; Hass P; Walke M; Amthauer H; Steffen IG
    EJNMMI Phys; 2014 Dec; 1(1):12. PubMed ID: 26501454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regularized reconstruction of digital time-of-flight
    Lindström E; Velikyan I; Regula N; Alhuseinalkhudhur A; Sundin A; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
    Theranostics; 2019; 9(12):3476-3484. PubMed ID: 31281491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is the standard uptake value (SUV) appropriate for quantification in clinical PET imaging? - Variability induced by different SUV measurements and varying reconstruction methods.
    Brendle C; Kupferschläger J; Nikolaou K; la Fougère C; Gatidis S; Pfannenberg C
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):158-162. PubMed ID: 25467224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phantom-based acquisition time and image reconstruction parameter optimisation for oncologic FDG PET/CT examinations using a digital system.
    Fragoso Costa P; Jentzen W; Brahmer A; Mavroeidi IA; Zarrad F; Umutlu L; Fendler WP; Rischpler C; Herrmann K; Conti M; Seifert R; Sraieb M; Weber M; Kersting D
    BMC Cancer; 2022 Aug; 22(1):899. PubMed ID: 35978274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 18F-FLT Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging in Pancreatic Cancer: Determination of Tumor Proliferative Activity and Comparison with Glycolytic Activity as Measured by 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging.
    Debebe SA; Goryawala M; Adjouadi M; Mcgoron AJ; Güleç SA
    Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther; 2016 Feb; 25(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 27299286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of MR-Based Attenuation Correction of a Newly Released Whole-Body Simultaneous PET/MR System.
    Liu G; Cao T; Hu L; Zheng J; Pang L; Hu P; Gu Y; Shi H
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():8213215. PubMed ID: 31886254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determination of optimal regularization factor in Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction of brain PET images using [
    Wagatsuma K; Miwa K; Kamitaka Y; Koike E; Yamao T; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Nezu S; Sugamata Y; Miyaji N; Imabayashi E; Ishibashi K; Toyohara J; Ishii K
    Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):2995-3005. PubMed ID: 35246870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The variation of quantitative parameters and Deauville scores with different reconstruction algorithms in FDG PET/CT imaging of lymphoma patients.
    Genc M; Yildirim N; Coskun N; Ozdemir E; Turkolmez S
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2023; 42(6):388-392. PubMed ID: 37524200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the standardized uptake value (SUV) in lymph node metastases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using hybrid 18F-FDG PET/MRI.
    Schaarschmidt BM; Buchbender C; Nensa F; Grueneisen J; Gomez B; Köhler J; Reis H; Ruhlmann V; Umutlu L; Heusch P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e0116277. PubMed ID: 25574968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimizing positron emission tomography image acquisition protocols in integrated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hartung-Knemeyer V; Beiderwellen KJ; Buchbender C; Kuehl H; Lauenstein TC; Bockisch A; Poeppel TD
    Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):290-4. PubMed ID: 23399811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.