497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30545395)
1. Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Li S; Trinh NH; Evans CF; Baglietto L; Krishnan K; Dite GS; Stone J; English DR; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 30545395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness thresholds better predicts breast cancer risk.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Dite GS; Stone J; MacInnis RJ; Dowty JG; Bickerstaffe A; Aujard K; Rommens JM; Song YM; Sung J; Jenkins MA; Southey MC; Giles GG; Apicella C; Hopper JL
Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Apr; 46(2):652-661. PubMed ID: 28338721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic density defined by higher than conventional brightness threshold better predicts breast cancer risk for full-field digital mammograms.
Nguyen TL; Aung YK; Evans CF; Yoon-Ho C; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Hopper JL; Song YM
Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Nov; 17():142. PubMed ID: 26581435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast Cancer Risk Associations with Digital Mammographic Density by Pixel Brightness Threshold and Mammographic System.
Nguyen TL; Choi YH; Aung YK; Evans CF; Trinh NH; Li S; Dite GS; Kim MS; Brennan PC; Jenkins MA; Sung J; Song YM; Hopper JL
Radiology; 2018 Feb; 286(2):433-442. PubMed ID: 29040039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Derived mammographic masking measures based on simulated lesions predict the risk of interval cancer after controlling for known risk factors: a case-case analysis.
Hinton B; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Fan B; Greenwood H; Joe B; Lee V; Strand F; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1309-1316. PubMed ID: 30697755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by tumor characteristics: a case-control study.
Krishnan K; Baglietto L; Stone J; McLean C; Southey MC; English DR; Giles GG; Hopper JL
BMC Cancer; 2017 Dec; 17(1):859. PubMed ID: 29246131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by mode of detection and tumor size: a case-control study.
Krishnan K; Baglietto L; Apicella C; Stone J; Southey MC; English DR; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Jun; 18(1):63. PubMed ID: 27316945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established mammographic density measure.
Nguyen TL; Schmidt DF; Makalic E; Maskarinec G; Li S; Dite GS; Aung YK; Evans CF; Trinh HN; Baglietto L; Stone J; Song YM; Sung J; MacInnis RJ; Dugué PA; Dowty JG; Jenkins MA; Milne RL; Southey MC; Giles GG; Hopper JL
Int J Cancer; 2021 May; 148(9):2193-2202. PubMed ID: 33197272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Novel mammographic image features differentiate between interval and screen-detected breast cancer: a case-case study.
Strand F; Humphreys K; Cheddad A; Törnberg S; Azavedo E; Shepherd J; Hall P; Czene K
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Oct; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 27716311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adjusting for BMI in analyses of volumetric mammographic density and breast cancer risk.
Hudson S; Vik Hjerkind K; Vinnicombe S; Allen S; Trewin C; Ursin G; Dos-Santos-Silva I; De Stavola BL
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Dec; 20(1):156. PubMed ID: 30594212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association of breast cancer with quantitative mammographic density measures for women receiving contrast-enhanced mammography.
Watt GP; Keshavamurthy KN; Nguyen TL; Lobbes MBI; Jochelson MS; Sung JS; Moskowitz CS; Patel P; Liang X; Woods M; Hopper JL; Pike MC; Bernstein JL
JNCI Cancer Spectr; 2024 Apr; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 38565262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interval breast cancer risk associations with breast density, family history and breast tissue aging.
Nguyen TL; Li S; Dite GS; Aung YK; Evans CF; Trinh HN; Baglietto L; Stone J; Song YM; Sung J; English DR; Jenkins MA; Dugué PA; Milne RL; Southey MC; Giles GG; Pike MC; Hopper JL
Int J Cancer; 2020 Jul; 147(2):375-382. PubMed ID: 31609476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk factors and tumor characteristics of interval cancers by mammographic density.
Holm J; Humphreys K; Li J; Ploner A; Cheddad A; Eriksson M; Törnberg S; Hall P; Czene K
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(9):1030-7. PubMed ID: 25646195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing breast cancer risk within the general screening population: developing a breast cancer risk model to identify higher risk women at mammographic screening.
Abdolell M; Payne JI; Caines J; Tsuruda K; Barnes PJ; Talbot PJ; Tong O; Brown P; Rivers-Bowerman M; Iles S
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5417-5426. PubMed ID: 32358648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Localized mammographic density is associated with interval cancer and large breast cancer: a nested case-control study.
Strand F; Azavedo E; Hellgren R; Humphreys K; Eriksson M; Shepherd J; Hall P; Czene K
Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Jan; 21(1):8. PubMed ID: 30670066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the Mayo Mammography Health Study cohort.
Olson JE; Sellers TA; Scott CG; Schueler BA; Brandt KR; Serie DJ; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Morton MJ; Heine JJ; Couch FJ; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM
Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Nov; 14(6):R147. PubMed ID: 23152984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic density: a case-control study.
Astley SM; Harkness EF; Sergeant JC; Warwick J; Stavrinos P; Warren R; Wilson M; Beetles U; Gadde S; Lim Y; Jain A; Bundred S; Barr N; Reece V; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Howell T; Evans DG
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):10. PubMed ID: 29402289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploring the prediction performance for breast cancer risk based on volumetric mammographic density at different thresholds.
Wang C; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Harkness EF; Evans DG; Astley S
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Jun; 20(1):49. PubMed ID: 29884207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The distribution and determinants of mammographic density measures in Western Australian aboriginal women.
McLean K; Darcey E; Cadby G; Lund H; Pilkington L; Redfern A; Thompson S; Saunders C; Wylie E; Stone J
Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Feb; 21(1):33. PubMed ID: 30819215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
