264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30545680)
1. Performance of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Discriminating Between Benign Tissue, Low and High Gleason Grade Prostate Cancer.
Di Trani MG; Nezzo M; Caporale AS; De Feo R; Miano R; Mauriello A; Bove P; Manenti G; Capuani S
Acad Radiol; 2019 Oct; 26(10):1328-1337. PubMed ID: 30545680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of pathologic Gleason grade of prostate cancer.
Wang Q; Li H; Yan X; Wu CJ; Liu XS; Shi HB; Zhang YD
Urol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 33(8):337.e15-24. PubMed ID: 26048104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Discussion of correlation between histogram analysis of quantitative diffusion weighted imaging and Gleason score of prostate cancer].
Wen R; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Shen JK
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 99(11):823-828. PubMed ID: 30893724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging derived maps may distinguish between low and high grade gliomas before surgery.
Qi XX; Shi DF; Ren SX; Zhang SY; Li L; Li QC; Guan LM
Eur Radiol; 2018 Apr; 28(4):1748-1755. PubMed ID: 29143940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Combined With DWI at 3-T MRI for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer.
Wang X; Tu N; Qin T; Xing F; Wang P; Wu G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 211(4):797-804. PubMed ID: 30085835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic evaluation of diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer: Detection in a biopsy population.
Ding K; Yao Y; Gao Y; Lu X; Chen H; Tang Q; Hua C; Zhou M; Zou X; Yin Q
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():138-146. PubMed ID: 31439233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mean diffusivity discriminates between prostate cancer with grade group 1&2 and grade groups equal to or greater than 3.
Nezzo M; Di Trani MG; Caporale A; Miano R; Mauriello A; Bove P; Capuani S; Manenti G
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1794-1801. PubMed ID: 27666618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histogram analysis in predicting the grade and histological subtype of meningiomas based on diffusion kurtosis imaging.
Chen X; Lin L; Wu J; Yang G; Zhong T; Du X; Chen Z; Xu G; Song Y; Xue Y; Duan Q
Acta Radiol; 2020 Sep; 61(9):1228-1239. PubMed ID: 31986895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The performance of intravoxel-incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging derived hypoxia for the risk stratification of prostate cancer in peripheral zone.
Chen Z; Xue Y; Zhang Z; Li W; Wen M; Zhao Y; Li J; Weng Z; Ye Q
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 125():108865. PubMed ID: 32058895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate cancer aggressive prediction: preponderant diagnostic performances of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) beyond ADC at 3.0 T scanner with gleason score at final pathology.
Shan Y; Chen X; Liu K; Zeng M; Zhou J
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Oct; 44(10):3441-3452. PubMed ID: 31144091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Grading and proliferation assessment of diffuse astrocytic tumors with monoexponential, biexponential, and stretched-exponential diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging.
Zhang J; Chen X; Chen D; Wang Z; Li S; Zhu W
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Dec; 109():188-195. PubMed ID: 30527302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differentiation of high-grade-astrocytomas from solitary-brain-metastases: Comparing diffusion kurtosis imaging and diffusion tensor imaging.
Tan Y; Wang XC; Zhang H; Wang J; Qin JB; Wu XF; Zhang L; Wang L
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2618-24. PubMed ID: 26482747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The histogram analysis of diffusion-weighted intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) imaging for differentiating the gleason grade of prostate cancer.
Zhang YD; Wang Q; Wu CJ; Wang XN; Zhang J; Liu H; Liu XS; Shi HB
Eur Radiol; 2015 Apr; 25(4):994-1004. PubMed ID: 25430007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging Models With Reactive Stromal Grade in Prostate Cancer.
Duan Z; Fang S; Hu J; Tao J; Zhang K; Deng X; Wang S; Liu Y
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Aug; 58(2):630-639. PubMed ID: 36444747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differentiation of prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia: comparisons of the histogram analysis of intravoxel incoherent motion and monoexponential model with in-bore MR-guided biopsy as pathological reference.
Cui Y; Li C; Liu Y; Jiang Y; Yu L; Liu M; Zhang W; Shi K; Zhang C; Zhang J; Chen M
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Oct; 45(10):3265-3277. PubMed ID: 31549212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diffusional kurtosis imaging for differentiation of additional suspicious lesions on preoperative breast MRI of patients with known breast cancer.
Park VY; Kim SG; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim MJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 62():199-208. PubMed ID: 31323316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of diagnostic performance between diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters and mono-exponential ADC for determination of clinically significant cancer in patients with prostate cancer.
Park H; Kim SH; Lee Y; Son JH
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4235-4243. PubMed ID: 32965517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Non-Gaussian water diffusion kurtosis imaging of prostate cancer.
Suo S; Chen X; Wu L; Zhang X; Yao Q; Fan Y; Wang H; Xu J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 24602826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histogram analysis in prostate cancer: a comparison of diffusion kurtosis imaging model versus monoexponential model.
Jiang Y; Li C; Liu Y; Shi K; Zhang W; Liu M; Chen M
Acta Radiol; 2020 Oct; 61(10):1431-1440. PubMed ID: 32008343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
