160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30545695)
1. Measurement of vascularity in the scar: A systematic review.
Deng H; Li-Tsang CWP
Burns; 2019 Sep; 45(6):1253-1265. PubMed ID: 30545695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interpretation of the DermaLab Combo® pigmentation and vascularity measurements in burn scar assessment: an exploratory analysis.
Gankande TU; Duke JM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2015 Sep; 41(6):1176-85. PubMed ID: 25703660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A systematic review of the quality of burn scar rating scales for clinical and research use.
Tyack Z; Simons M; Spinks A; Wasiak J
Burns; 2012 Feb; 38(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 22047828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring vascularity of hypertrophic scars by dermoscopy: Construct validity and predictive ability of scar thickness change.
Deng H; Li-Tsang CWP; Li J
Skin Res Technol; 2020 May; 26(3):369-375. PubMed ID: 31916320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A validation study of scar vascularity and pigmentation assessment using dermoscopy.
Wei Y; Li-Tsang CWP; Luk DCK; Tan T; Zhang W; Chiu TW
Burns; 2015 Dec; 41(8):1717-1723. PubMed ID: 26071080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigating the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a panel of subjective and objective burn scar measurement tools.
Lee KC; Bamford A; Gardiner F; Agovino A; Ter Horst B; Bishop J; Sitch A; Grover L; Logan A; Moiemen NS
Burns; 2019 Sep; 45(6):1311-1324. PubMed ID: 31327551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct comparison of reproducibility and reliability in quantitative assessments of burn scar properties.
Baumann ME; DeBruler DM; Blackstone BN; Coffey RA; Boyce ST; Supp DM; Bailey JK; Powell HM
Burns; 2021 Mar; 47(2):466-478. PubMed ID: 32839037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How to evaluate scar colour after burn injuries - A clinical comparison of the Mexameter® and the subjective scar assessment (POSAS/VSS).
Bagheri M; von Kohout M; Fuchs PC; Seyhan H; Stromps JP; Lefering R; Opländer C; Schiefer JL
Burns; 2024 Apr; 50(3):691-701. PubMed ID: 38097444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative measurement of hypertrophic scar: interrater reliability and concurrent validity.
Nedelec B; Correa JA; Rachelska G; Armour A; LaSalle L
J Burn Care Res; 2008; 29(3):501-11. PubMed ID: 18388576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing Scar Outcomes Using Objective Scar Measurement Tools: An Adjunct to Validated Scar Evaluation Scales.
Bernabe RM; Madrigal P; Choe D; Pham C; Yenikomshian HA; Gillenwater J
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38546618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of inter-rater reliability in pediatric burn scar assessment using a modified version of the Vancouver Scar Scale.
Forbes-Duchart L; Marshall S; Strock A; Cooper JE
J Burn Care Res; 2007; 28(3):460-7. PubMed ID: 17438503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Meta-analysis of efficacy of pressure therapy in treating patients with hypertrophic scars].
Tian LY; Li YL; Wu Y; Zhang Y
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2019 Sep; 35(9):668-675. PubMed ID: 31594185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Current tools for noninvasive objective assessment of skin scars.
Perry DM; McGrouther DA; Bayat A
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Sep; 126(3):912-923. PubMed ID: 20811225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of frequency of use of different scar assessment scales based on the scar condition and treatment method.
Bae SH; Bae YC
Arch Plast Surg; 2014 Mar; 41(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 24665417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale.
van de Kar AL; Corion LU; Smeulders MJ; Draaijers LJ; van der Horst CM; van Zuijlen PP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Aug; 116(2):514-22. PubMed ID: 16079683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Objective scar assessment tools: a clinimetric appraisal.
Verhaegen PDHM; van der Wal MBA; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PPM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Apr; 127(4):1561-1570. PubMed ID: 21460665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Standardized assessment of breast cancer surgical scars integrating the Vancouver Scar Scale, Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, and patients' perspectives.
Truong PT; Abnousi F; Yong CM; Hayashi A; Runkel JA; Phillips T; Olivotto IA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Oct; 116(5):1291-9. PubMed ID: 16217470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Values of a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale to Evaluate the Facial Skin Graft Scar.
Chae JK; Kim JH; Kim EJ; Park K
Ann Dermatol; 2016 Oct; 28(5):615-623. PubMed ID: 27746642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A modified Vancouver Scar Scale linked with TBSA (mVSS-TBSA): Inter-rater reliability of an innovative burn scar assessment method.
Gankande TU; Wood FM; Edgar DW; Duke JM; DeJong HM; Henderson AE; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2013 Sep; 39(6):1142-9. PubMed ID: 23433706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient-and observer-reported long-term scar quality of wide local excision scars in melanoma patients.
Weitemeyer MB; Bramsen P; Klausen TW; Hölmich LR; Gjorup CA
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2018 Dec; 52(6):319-324. PubMed ID: 30380964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
