These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30545695)

  • 21.
    Wang Q; Gong P; Afsharan H; Joo C; Morellini N; Fear M; Wood F; Ho H; Silva D; Cense B
    J Biomed Opt; 2023 Dec; 28(12):126001. PubMed ID: 38074217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Quantitative measurement of hypertrophic scar: intrarater reliability, sensitivity, and specificity.
    Nedelec B; Correa JA; Rachelska G; Armour A; LaSalle L
    J Burn Care Res; 2008; 29(3):489-500. PubMed ID: 18388577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Scar assessment scales: a dermatologic overview.
    Idriss N; Maibach HI
    Skin Res Technol; 2009 Feb; 15(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 19152571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Subjective scar assessment scales in orthopaedic surgery and determinants of patient satisfaction: A systematic review of the literature.
    Abelleyra Lastoria DA; Benny CK; Hing CB
    Chin J Traumatol; 2023 Sep; 26(5):276-283. PubMed ID: 36804261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Burn Scar Evaluation Using the Cutometer® MPA 580 in Comparison to "Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale" and "Vancouver Scar Scale".
    Busche MN; Thraen AJ; Gohritz A; Rennekampff HO; Vogt PM
    J Burn Care Res; 2018 Jun; 39(4):516-526. PubMed ID: 29596600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Exploring reliability of scar rating scales using photographs of burns from children aged up to 15 years.
    Simons M; Ziviani J; Thorley M; McNee J; Tyack Z
    J Burn Care Res; 2013; 34(4):427-38. PubMed ID: 23271058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation.
    Draaijers LJ; Tempelman FR; Botman YA; Tuinebreijer WE; Middelkoop E; Kreis RW; van Zuijlen PP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jun; 113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. PubMed ID: 15253184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Burn scar assessment: A systematic review of objective scar assessment tools.
    Brusselaers N; Pirayesh A; Hoeksema H; Verbelen J; Blot S; Monstrey S
    Burns; 2010 Dec; 36(8):1157-64. PubMed ID: 20488623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinimetrics of tristimulus colourimeters in scar assessment: a review of evidence.
    Jones HG
    J Wound Care; 2012 Jan; 21(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 22240930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fractional CO
    Karmisholt KE; Taudorf EH; Wulff CB; Wenande E; Philipsen PA; Haedersdal M
    Lasers Surg Med; 2017 Feb; 49(2):189-197. PubMed ID: 27862066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Systematic Review on the Content of Outcome Measurement Instruments on Scar Quality.
    Carrière ME; Kwa KAA; de Haas LEM; Pijpe A; Tyack Z; Ket JCF; van Zuijlen PPM; de Vet HCW; Mokkink LB
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2019 Sep; 7(9):e2424. PubMed ID: 31741815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinimetric properties and clinical utility in rehabilitation of postsurgical scar rating scales: a systematic review.
    Vercelli S; Ferriero G; Sartorio F; Cisari C; Bravini E
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2015 Dec; 38(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 26426285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How to assess postsurgical scars: a review of outcome measures.
    Vercelli S; Ferriero G; Sartorio F; Stissi V; Franchignoni F
    Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(25):2055-63. PubMed ID: 19888834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Burn scar assessment: a systematic review of different scar scales.
    Brusselaers N; Pirayesh A; Hoeksema H; Verbelen J; Blot S; Monstrey S
    J Surg Res; 2010 Nov; 164(1):e115-23. PubMed ID: 20828761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluating skin colour diversity in the validation of scar assessment tools.
    Garg SP; Williams T; Taritsa IC; Wan R; Goel C; Harris R; Huffman K; Galiano RD
    Wound Repair Regen; 2023; 31(6):731-737. PubMed ID: 37768279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Scar massage for hypertrophic burns scarring-A systematic review.
    Ault P; Plaza A; Paratz J
    Burns; 2018 Feb; 44(1):24-38. PubMed ID: 28669442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and a 4-point scale in evaluating linear facial surgical scars.
    Liu X; Nelemans PJ; Van Winden M; Kelleners-Smeets NW; Mosterd K
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2017 Feb; 31(2):341-346. PubMed ID: 27439316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A systematic review of objective burn scar measurements.
    Lee KC; Dretzke J; Grover L; Logan A; Moiemen N
    Burns Trauma; 2016; 4():14. PubMed ID: 27574684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Measurements of scar properties by SkinFibroMeter
    Seo SR; Kang NO; Yoon MS; Lee HJ; Kim DH
    Skin Res Technol; 2017 Aug; 23(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 27796064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reliability and validity testing of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in evaluating linear scars after breast cancer surgery.
    Truong PT; Lee JC; Soer B; Gaul CA; Olivotto IA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Feb; 119(2):487-94. PubMed ID: 17230080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.