These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30545695)

  • 41. Application of tissue ultrasound palpation system (TUPS) in objective scar evaluation.
    Lau JC; Li-Tsang CW; Zheng YP
    Burns; 2005 Jun; 31(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 15896506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Predictive validity of short term scar quality on final burn scar outcome using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in patients with minor to moderate burn severity.
    Goei H; van der Vlies CH; Tuinebreijer WE; van Zuijlen PPM; Middelkoop E; van Baar ME
    Burns; 2017 Jun; 43(4):715-723. PubMed ID: 28040371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A critical analysis of measurements used to assess and manage scars.
    Roques C; Teot L
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2007 Dec; 6(4):249-53. PubMed ID: 18048870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A prospective randomized evaluation of scar assessment measures.
    Brandt MG; Moore CC; Micomonaco D; Fung K; Franklin JH; Yoo J; Doyle PC
    Laryngoscope; 2009 May; 119(5):841-5. PubMed ID: 19266588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Reliability of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in Evaluating Linear Scars after Thyroidectomy.
    Chung JH; Kwon SH; Kim KJ; Lee JM; Yoon JM; Cheon JH; Yoon ES; Park SH
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2021 Jun; 34(6):1-6. PubMed ID: 33979825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Assessing blood flow, microvasculature, erythema and redness in hypertrophic scars: A cross sectional study showing different features that require precise definitions.
    Jaspers MEH; Stekelenburg CM; Simons JM; Brouwer KM; Vlig M; van den Kerckhove E; Middelkoop E; van Zuijlen PPM
    Burns; 2017 Aug; 43(5):1044-1050. PubMed ID: 28153584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Long-term scar quality in burns with three distinct healing potentials: A multicenter prospective cohort study.
    Goei H; van der Vlies CH; Hop MJ; Tuinebreijer WE; Nieuwenhuis MK; Middelkoop E; van Baar ME
    Wound Repair Regen; 2016 Jul; 24(4):721-30. PubMed ID: 27102976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Objective color measurements: clinimetric performance of three devices on normal skin and scar tissue.
    van der Wal M; Bloemen M; Verhaegen P; Tuinebreijer W; de Vet H; van Zuijlen P; Middelkoop E
    J Burn Care Res; 2013; 34(3):e187-94. PubMed ID: 23237819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Health professionals' and consumers' opinion: what is considered important when rating burn scars from photographs?
    Simons M; Tyack Z
    J Burn Care Res; 2011; 32(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 21233729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Laser treatments in early wound healing improve scar appearance: a randomized split-wound trial with nonablative fractional laser exposures vs. untreated controls.
    Karmisholt KE; Banzhaf CA; Glud M; Yeung K; Paasch U; Nast A; Haedersdal M
    Br J Dermatol; 2018 Dec; 179(6):1307-1314. PubMed ID: 30101519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Aesthetic evaluation after non-invasive treatment for superficial basal cell carcinoma.
    Mosterd K; Arits AH; Nelemans PJ; Kelleners-Smeets NW
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2013 May; 27(5):647-50. PubMed ID: 22103716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars.
    Kantor J
    JAMA Dermatol; 2017 Jan; 153(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 27806156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. How to assess scar hypertrophy--a comparison of subjective scales and Spectrocutometry: a new objective method.
    Kaartinen IS; Välisuo PO; Bochko V; Alander JT; Kuokkanen HO
    Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 21518084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Clinical effects of sequential laser treatments on early stage hypertrophic burn scars].
    Xie WG; Lei F; Wang J; Xu J; Ruan JJ; Li Z
    Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 34(9):615-623. PubMed ID: 30293365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A practical and objective approach to scar colour assessment.
    Hallam MJ; McNaught K; Thomas AN; Nduka C
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Oct; 66(10):e271-6. PubMed ID: 23880014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Rating the resolving hypertrophic scar: comparison of the Vancouver Scar Scale and scar volume.
    Nedelec B; Shankowsky HA; Tredget EE
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 2000; 21(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 10850901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Analysis of trends and status of evaluation methods in thyroid scar.
    Choi WK; Shin HY; Park YJ; Lee SH; Lee AY; Hong JS
    Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(9):e29301. PubMed ID: 38720695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Automated VSS-based Burn Scar Assessment using Combined Texture and Color Features of Digital Images in Error-Correcting Output Coding.
    Pham TD; Karlsson M; Andersson CM; Mirdell R; Sjoberg F
    Sci Rep; 2017 Dec; 7(1):16744. PubMed ID: 29196632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Validation of an objective scar pigmentation measurement by using a spectrocolorimeter.
    Li-Tsang CW; Lau JC; Liu SK
    Burns; 2003 Dec; 29(8):779-84. PubMed ID: 14636751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Ultrapulsed fractional ablative carbon dioxide laser treatment of hypertrophic burn scars: evaluation of an in-patient controlled, standardized treatment approach.
    Poetschke J; Dornseifer U; Clementoni MT; Reinholz M; Schwaiger H; Steckmeier S; Ruzicka T; Gauglitz GG
    Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Jul; 32(5):1031-1040. PubMed ID: 28401348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.