138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30545800)
1. Ex-vivo and in vitro validation of an innovative mandibular condyle implant concept.
Ramos A; Gonzalez-Perez LM; Infante-Cossio P; Mesnard M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 47(1):112-119. PubMed ID: 30545800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strain induced in the condyle by self-tapping screws in the Biomet alloplastic temporomandibular joint: a preliminary experimental study.
Ramos A; Duarte RJ; Mesnard M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 44(11):1376-82. PubMed ID: 26194773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new condyle implant design concept for an alloplastic temporomandibular joint in bone resorption cases.
Ramos A; Mesnard M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 44(10):1670-1677. PubMed ID: 27569384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Christensen vs Biomet Microfixation alloplastic TMJ implant: Are there improvements? A numerical study.
Ramos A; Mesnard M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1398-403. PubMed ID: 26300296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental and numerical predictions of Biomet(®) alloplastic implant in a cadaveric mandibular ramus.
Mesnard M; Ramos A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 May; 44(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 27017105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Theoretical assessment of an intramedullary condylar component versus screw fixation for the condylar component of a hemiarthroplasty alloplastic TMJ replacement system.
Ramos A; Mesnard M; Relvas C; Completo A; Simões JA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 42(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 23684530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Load transfer in Christensen(®) TMJ in alloplastic total joint replacement for two different mouth apertures.
Ramos A; Mesnard M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1442-9. PubMed ID: 24954763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction at long-term condyle screw fixation of temporomandibular joint implant: A numerical study.
Ramos A; Duarte RJ; Mesnard M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 43(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 25819477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The stock alloplastic temporomandibular joint implant can influence the behavior of the opposite native joint: A numerical study.
Ramos AM; Mesnard M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1384-91. PubMed ID: 26231883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influences of implant condyle geometry on bone and screw strains in a temporomandibular implant.
Mesnard M; Ramos A; Simões JA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 23726645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite element analysis of a condylar support prosthesis to replace the temporomandibular joint.
Abel EW; Hilgers A; McLoughlin PM
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 53(4):352-7. PubMed ID: 25703687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Straight, semi-anatomic and anatomic TMJ implants: the influence of condylar geometry and bone fixation screws.
Ramos A; Completo A; Relvas C; Mesnard M; Simões JA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 39(5):343-50. PubMed ID: 20801667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Design and clinical outcome of a novel 3D-printed prosthetic joint replacement for the human temporomandibular joint.
Ackland D; Robinson D; Lee PVS; Dimitroulis G
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Jul; 56():52-60. PubMed ID: 29803823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of screw fixation on temporomandibular joint condylar prosthesis.
Hsu JT; Huang HL; Tsai MT; Fuh LJ; Tu MG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 69(5):1320-8. PubMed ID: 21216062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of load transfers in TMJ replacement using a standard and a custom-made temporal component.
Ramos A; Mesnard M
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1766-72. PubMed ID: 25009108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a mandibular motion simulator for total joint replacement.
Celebi N; Rohner EC; Gateno J; Noble PC; Ismaily SK; Teichgraeber JF; Xia JJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jan; 69(1):66-79. PubMed ID: 21050636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomet stock temporomandibular joint prosthesis: Long-term outcomes of the use of titanium condyles secured with four or five condylar fixation screws.
Kanatsios S; Breik O; Dimitroulis G
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 46(10):1697-1702. PubMed ID: 30037502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Effects of Unilateral Alloplastic Temporomandibular Joint Replacement on the Opposite-Side Natural Joint: A Finite-Element Analysis.
Bekcioglu B; Bulut E; Bas B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 75(11):2316-2322. PubMed ID: 28623683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of bone adaptation after modification in biomet standard alloplastic temporomandibular joint prostheses.
Zhao J; Zou L; He D; Ellis E
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 46(10):1707-1711. PubMed ID: 30150011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical simulation of temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJR) devices: a scoping review of the finite element method.
Rodrigues YL; Mathew MT; Mercuri LG; da Silva JSP; Henriques B; Souza JCM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Aug; 47(8):1032-1042. PubMed ID: 29526560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
