168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30547901)
1. Time Intervals Between Prior Cervical Conization and Posterior Hysterectomy Influence Postoperative Infection in Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia or Cancer.
Yin X; Zhu L; Tan W; Zhu X; Liu S; Xu W
Med Sci Monit; 2018 Dec; 24():9063-9072. PubMed ID: 30547901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Postoperative morbidity in cases of cervical conization followed by vaginal hysterectomy.
Elkins TE; Gallup DG; Slomka CV; Phelan JP
South Med J; 1982 Mar; 75(3):264-6. PubMed ID: 7063896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia positive cutting edge after conization].
Dai ZQ; Pan LY; Huang HF
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 29(2):153-4. PubMed ID: 17645859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Diagnosis and treatment of grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by cervical conization in 98 patients].
Chen W; Guan T
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2010 Jul; 30(7):1642-4, 1647. PubMed ID: 20650790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of interval between conization and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on the morbidity of patients with cervical cancer.
Li H; Jang JY; Li H; Chen K; Shao XG
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2012; 33(6):601-4. PubMed ID: 23327053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive factors used to justify hysterectomy after loop conization: increasing age and severity of disease.
Kalogirou D; Antoniou G; Karakitsos P; Botsis D; Kalogirou O; Giannikos L
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1997; 18(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 9105859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of time intervals between loop electrosurgical excision and subsequent hysterectomy on the morbidity of patients with cervical neoplasia.
Tae Kim Y; Sung Yoon B; Hoon Kim S; Hoon Kim J; Wook Kim J; Won Park Y
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Feb; 96(2):500-3. PubMed ID: 15661242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relation between vaginal and endocervical pH in patients undergoing cold-knife conization and hysterectomy.
Murta EF; Perfeito PB; Oliveira TM; Michelin MA; Maluf PJ
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Jan; 277(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 17653563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of Conservative Surgical Treatment and Prognosis of Microinvasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix Stage IA1: Results of Follow-Up to 20 Years.
Hartman CA; Teixeira JC; Barbosa SB; Figueiredo SM; Andrade LA; Bastos JF
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Feb; 27(2):357-363. PubMed ID: 27984378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictive factors for residual disease in hysterectomy specimens after conization in early-stage cervical cancer.
Wong AS; Li WH; Cheung TH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():21-6. PubMed ID: 26894378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Efficacy of complications of different surgical treatments in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III].
Zeng SY; Liang MR; Li LY; Wu YY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 44(8):574-7. PubMed ID: 20003783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The efficacy of conservative management after conization in patients with stage IA1 microinvasive cervical carcinoma.
Lee SW; Kim YM; Son WS; You HJ; Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim YT; Nam JH
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 19093236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evaluation of cervical conization in diagnosis and management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Shen K; Lang J; Huang H
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2001 May; 36(5):264-6. PubMed ID: 11783372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Conization non in sano].
Lahousen M; Pickel H; Girardi F; Jäger G
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 1992; 32 Suppl 1():131. PubMed ID: 1286317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.
Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Effect of cervical conization through hysteroscopy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III].
Liu M; Hou G; He Y; Peng D; Wang X; Chen W
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2012 May; 32(5):687-90. PubMed ID: 22588926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the efficacy and complications of different surgical methods for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Zeng SY; Liang MR; Li LY; Wu YY
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2012; 33(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 22873094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcome after conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III: relation with surgical margins, extension to the crypts and mitoses.
Maluf PJ; Adad SJ; Murta EF
Tumori; 2004; 90(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 15656332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Utility of conization with frozen section for intraoperative triage prior to definitive hysterectomy.
Martinelli F; Schmeler KM; Johnson C; Brown J; Euscher ED; Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Nov; 127(2):307-11. PubMed ID: 22842126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
