168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30547901)
21. Importance of surgical margins in conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III.
Murta EF; Resende AV; Souza MA; Adad SJ; Salum R
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1999 Nov; 263(1-2):42-4. PubMed ID: 10728628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Primary conization overcomes the risk of developing local recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer.
Bogani G; Ditto A; Chiappa V; Pinelli C; Sonetto C; Raspagliesi F
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2020 Oct; 151(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 32511745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Reasonable surgical approach for grade III cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Wu X; Cui Y; Gong Y; Xu H; Jiang D; Meng S
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Aug; 37(8):824-8. PubMed ID: 22954923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prognostic value of p16(INK4a) as a marker of clinical evolution in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN 3) treated by cervical conization.
Cardoso FA; Campaner AB; Silva MA
APMIS; 2014 Mar; 122(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 23763281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Pregnancy following cervical conization.
Buller RE; Jones HW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Mar; 142(5):506-12. PubMed ID: 7058852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The problems of cervical conization for postmenopausal patients.
Hasegawa K; Torii Y; Kato R; Udagawa Y; Fukasawa I
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2016; 37(3):327-31. PubMed ID: 27352558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of cervical length and optimal timing for pregnancy after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A retrospective study.
Zhang X; Tong J; Ma X; Yu H; Guan X; Li J; Yang J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Dec; 99(49):e23411. PubMed ID: 33285731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Predictors of residual lesion in cervix after conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and microinvasive cervical cancer].
Tan XJ; Wu M; Lang JH; Ma SQ; Shen K; Yang J
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jan; 89(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 19489237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Conization using electrosurgical conization and cold coagulation for international federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IA1 squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix.
Lee SJ; Kim WY; Lee JW; Kim HS; Choi YL; Ahn GH; Lee JH; Kim BG; Bae DS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Apr; 19(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 19407568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Cervical carcinoma in situ: a clinical and pathological analysis of 118 cases].
Yang JX; Shen K; Lang JH; Huang HF; Wu M; Pan LY
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Feb; 86(5):300-2. PubMed ID: 16677520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. High-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in pregnancy: clinicotherapeutic management.
Penna C; Fallani MG; Maggiorelli M; Zipoli E; Cardelli A; Marchionni M
Tumori; 1998; 84(5):567-70. PubMed ID: 9862518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Risk of cervical stenosis after large loop excision or laser conization.
Baldauf JJ; Dreyfus M; Ritter J; Meyer P; Philippe E
Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Dec; 88(6):933-8. PubMed ID: 8942830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Evaluation of the follow up results of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III after surgical treatment].
Dai ZQ; Pan LY; Huang HF; Lang JH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 42(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 17442185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The value of MR-based radiomics in identifying residual disease in patients with carcinoma in situ after cervical conization.
Song M; Lin J; Song F; Wu D; Qian Z
Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19890. PubMed ID: 33199785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia before and after introduction of laser conization].
Nordland K; Skjeldestad FE; Hagen B
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Jan; 125(2):167-9. PubMed ID: 15665889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Uncertainty remains about early pregnancy outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Manley KM; Draycott T
Evid Based Med; 2015 Apr; 20(2):72. PubMed ID: 25666018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Predictors and clinical significance of the positive cone margin in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III patients.
Sun XG; Ma SQ; Zhang JX; Wu M
Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Feb; 122(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 19302737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Conservative management of stage IA1 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix with positive resection margins after conization.
Kim WY; Chang SJ; Chang KH; Yoo SC; Ryu HS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2010 May; 109(2):110-2. PubMed ID: 20096835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. High-grade vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia after hysterectomy for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Is hysterectomy a "definitive" treatment compared to conization?
Tanaka M; Yamanoi K; Taki M; Kitamura S; Sunada M; Chigusa Y; Horie A; Yamaguchi K; Hamanishi J; Mandai M
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Sep; 49(9):2361-2369. PubMed ID: 37354106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cold-knife conization versus the loop electrosurgical excision procedure for treatment of cervical dysplasia.
Bozanović T; Ljubic A; Momcilov P; Milicevic S; Mostić T; Atanacković J
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2008; 29(1):83-5. PubMed ID: 18386472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
