BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30548106)

  • 1. Effects of Multiple Waveforms on Patient Preferences and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Treated With Spinal Cord Stimulation for Leg and/or Back Pain.
    Duse G; Reverberi C; Dario A
    Neuromodulation; 2019 Feb; 22(2):200-207. PubMed ID: 30548106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Waves of Pain Relief: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials in Spinal Cord Stimulation Waveforms for the Treatment of Chronic Neuropathic Low Back and Leg Pain.
    Head J; Mazza J; Sabourin V; Turpin J; Hoelscher C; Wu C; Sharan A
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Nov; 131():264-274.e3. PubMed ID: 31369885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical Outcomes of 1 kHz Subperception Spinal Cord Stimulation in Implanted Patients With Failed Paresthesia-Based Stimulation: Results of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.
    North JM; Hong KJ; Cho PY
    Neuromodulation; 2016 Oct; 19(7):731-737. PubMed ID: 27186822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Should we Oppose or Combine Waveforms for Spinal Cord Stimulation in PSPS-T2 Patients? A Prospective Randomized Crossover Trial (MULTIWAVE Study).
    Rigoard P; Ounajim A; Moens M; Goudman L; Roulaud M; Lorgeoux B; Baron S; Nivole K; Many M; Lampert L; David R; Billot M
    J Pain; 2023 Dec; 24(12):2319-2339. PubMed ID: 37473903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Prospective, Randomized Single-Blind Crossover Study Comparing High-Frequency 10,000 Hz and Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation.
    Braun E; Khatri N; Kim B; Nazir N; Orr WN; Ballew A; Latif U; Sack A; Sowder T; Canova K; Clark S; Grace P; Khan TW
    Neuromodulation; 2023 Jul; 26(5):1023-1029. PubMed ID: 36494306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spinal Cord Stimulation: Comparing Traditional Low-frequency Tonic Waveforms to Novel High Frequency and Burst Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain.
    Morales A; Yong RJ; Kaye AD; Urman RD
    Curr Pain Headache Rep; 2019 Mar; 23(4):25. PubMed ID: 30868285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Trial Outcomes After Conversion to a Multiple Waveform SCS System.
    Haider N; Ligham D; Quave B; Harum KE; Garcia EA; Gilmore CA; Miller N; Moore GA; Bains A; Lechleiter K; Jain R
    Neuromodulation; 2018 Jul; 21(5):504-507. PubMed ID: 29889356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of 10-kHz High-Frequency and Traditional Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain: 24-Month Results From a Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Pivotal Trial.
    Kapural L; Yu C; Doust MW; Gliner BE; Vallejo R; Sitzman BT; Amirdelfan K; Morgan DM; Yearwood TL; Bundschu R; Yang T; Benyamin R; Burgher AH
    Neurosurgery; 2016 Nov; 79(5):667-677. PubMed ID: 27584814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High-Dose Spinal Cord Stimulation for Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain and Leg Pain in Patients With FBSS, 12-Month Results: A Prospective Pilot Study.
    Hamm-Faber TE; Gültuna I; van Gorp EJ; Aukes H
    Neuromodulation; 2020 Jan; 23(1):118-125. PubMed ID: 30860645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Burst SCS Microdosing Is as Efficacious as Standard Burst SCS in Treating Chronic Back and Leg Pain: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Vesper J; Slotty P; Schu S; Poeggel-Kraemer K; Littges H; Van Looy P; Agnesi F; Venkatesan L; Van Havenbergh T
    Neuromodulation; 2019 Feb; 22(2):190-193. PubMed ID: 30456795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Outcomes of a Multicenter, Prospective, Crossover, Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Subperception Spinal Cord Stimulation at ≤1.2 kHz in Previously Implanted Subjects.
    North J; Loudermilk E; Lee A; Sachdeva H; Kaiafas D; Washabaugh E; Sheth S; Scowcroft J; Mekhail N; Lampert B; Yearwood T; Shaw E; Atallah J; McLeod C; Han J; Yu C; Sedrak M; Lucas R; Trobridge A; Hegarty J; Miller N; Chen L; Jain R
    Neuromodulation; 2020 Jan; 23(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 31265205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of conventional, burst and high-frequency spinal cord stimulation on pain relief in refractory failed back surgery syndrome patients: study protocol for a prospective randomized double-blinded cross-over trial (MULTIWAVE study).
    Billot M; Naiditch N; Brandet C; Lorgeoux B; Baron S; Ounajim A; Roulaud M; Roy-Moreau A; de Montgazon G; Charrier E; Misbert L; Maillard B; Vendeuvre T; Rigoard P
    Trials; 2020 Aug; 21(1):696. PubMed ID: 32746899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz for the Treatment of Nonsurgical Refractory Back Pain: Design of a Pragmatic, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Patel N; Calodney A; Kapural L; Province-Azalde R; Lad SP; Pilitsis J; Wu C; Cherry T; Subbaroyan J; Gliner B; Caraway D
    Pain Pract; 2021 Feb; 21(2):171-183. PubMed ID: 33463027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Epidural Laterality and Pain Relief With Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation.
    Mironer YE; Hutcheson JK; Haasis JC; Worobel MA; Sakla ES
    Neuromodulation; 2023 Oct; 26(7):1465-1470. PubMed ID: 36180323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Redefining Spinal Cord Stimulation "Trials": A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Single-Stage Wireless Permanent Implantable Devices.
    North RB; Calodney A; Bolash R; Slavin KV; Creamer M; Rauck R; Vahedifar P; Fox I; Özaktay C; Panchal S; Vanquathem N
    Neuromodulation; 2020 Jan; 23(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 31157949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Options: A Prospective, Open-Label Study of High-Dose Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients with Chronic Back and Leg Pain.
    Benyamin R; Galan V; Hatheway J; Kim P; Choi D; Falowski S; Calodney A; Sweet J; Yu C; Kapural L; Provenzano D
    Pain Physician; 2020 Jan; 23(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 32013282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back pain patients: results of a prospective multicenter European clinical study.
    Van Buyten JP; Al-Kaisy A; Smet I; Palmisani S; Smith T
    Neuromodulation; 2013; 16(1):59-65; discussion 65-6. PubMed ID: 23199157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tonic, Burst, High-Density, and 10-kHz High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation: Efficiency and Patients' Preferences in a Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Predominant Population. Review of Literature.
    Peeters JB; Raftopoulos C
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Dec; 144():e331-e340. PubMed ID: 32889188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term quality of life improvement for chronic intractable back and leg pain patients using spinal cord stimulation: 12-month results from the SENZA-RCT.
    Amirdelfan K; Yu C; Doust MW; Gliner BE; Morgan DM; Kapural L; Vallejo R; Sitzman BT; Yearwood TL; Bundschu R; Yang T; Benyamin R; Burgher AH; Brooks ES; Powell AA; Subbaroyan J
    Qual Life Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2035-2044. PubMed ID: 29858746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High Frequency (10 kHz) or Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Patients With Predominant Back Pain: Preliminary Data From a Prospective Observational Study.
    Kinfe TM; Pintea B; Link C; Roeske S; Güresir E; Güresir Á; Vatter H
    Neuromodulation; 2016 Apr; 19(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 26762585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.