BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30550336)

  • 1. The intuitive greater good: Testing the corrective dual process model of moral cognition.
    Bago B; De Neys W
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1782-1801. PubMed ID: 30550336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers.
    Conway P; Goldstein-Greenwood J; Polacek D; Greene JD
    Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():241-265. PubMed ID: 30064654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are 'counter-intuitive' deontological judgments really counter-intuitive? An empirical reply to.
    Paxton JM; Bruni T; Greene JD
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 9(9):1368-71. PubMed ID: 23887818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach.
    Conway P; Gawronski B
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(2):216-35. PubMed ID: 23276267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The neural basis of intuitive and counterintuitive moral judgment.
    Kahane G; Wiech K; Shackel N; Farias M; Savulescu J; Tracey I
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2012 Apr; 7(4):393-402. PubMed ID: 21421730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intuition rather than deliberation determines selfish and prosocial choices.
    Bago B; Bonnefon JF; De Neys W
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Jun; 150(6):1081-1094. PubMed ID: 33119351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment.
    Kahane G
    Soc Neurosci; 2015; 10(5):551-60. PubMed ID: 25791902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Counter-intuitive moral judgement following traumatic brain injury.
    Rowley DA; Rogish M; Alexander T; Riggs KJ
    J Neuropsychol; 2018 Jun; 12(2):200-215. PubMed ID: 28168820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do affective episodes modulate moral judgment in individuals with bipolar disorder?
    Gago B; Perea M; Sierra P; Livianos L; Cañada-Martínez A; García-Blanco A
    J Affect Disord; 2019 Feb; 245():289-296. PubMed ID: 30419529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. (How) Do You Regret Killing One to Save Five? Affective and Cognitive Regret Differ After Utilitarian and Deontological Decisions.
    Goldstein-Greenwood J; Conway P; Summerville A; Johnson BN
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1303-1317. PubMed ID: 31989859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments.
    Everett JA; Pizarro DA; Crockett MJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Jun; 145(6):772-87. PubMed ID: 27054685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of subclinical depression on moral judgment dilemmas: a process dissociation approach.
    Yin X; Hong Z; Zheng Y; Ni Y
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):20065. PubMed ID: 36414675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment.
    Greene JD; Morelli SA; Lowenberg K; Nystrom LE; Cohen JD
    Cognition; 2008 Jun; 107(3):1144-54. PubMed ID: 18158145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Not all who ponder count costs: Arithmetic reflection predicts utilitarian tendencies, but logical reflection predicts both deontological and utilitarian tendencies.
    Byrd N; Conway P
    Cognition; 2019 Nov; 192():103995. PubMed ID: 31301587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reasoning supports utilitarian resolutions to moral dilemmas across diverse measures.
    Patil I; Zucchelli MM; Kool W; Campbell S; Fornasier F; Calò M; Silani G; Cikara M; Cushman F
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Feb; 120(2):443-460. PubMed ID: 31916813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fickle Judgments in Moral Dilemmas: Time Pressure and Utilitarian Judgments in an Interdependent Culture.
    Hashimoto H; Maeda K; Matsumura K
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():795732. PubMed ID: 35310271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Gender differences in responses to moral dilemmas: a process dissociation analysis.
    Friesdorf R; Conway P; Gawronski B
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 May; 41(5):696-713. PubMed ID: 25840987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The drunk utilitarian: blood alcohol concentration predicts utilitarian responses in moral dilemmas.
    Duke AA; Bègue L
    Cognition; 2015 Jan; 134():121-7. PubMed ID: 25460385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Emotional and Utilitarian Appraisals of Moral Dilemmas Are Encoded in Separate Areas and Integrated in Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex.
    Hutcherson CA; Montaser-Kouhsari L; Woodward J; Rangel A
    J Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 35(36):12593-605. PubMed ID: 26354924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Social (not fiscal) conservatism predicts deontological ethics.
    Chan EY
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102867. PubMed ID: 31234036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.