BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

360 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30550346)

  • 1. Use of colony-stimulating factor primary prophylaxis and incidence of febrile neutropenia from 2010 to 2016: a longitudinal assessment.
    Weycker D; Bensink M; Lonshteyn A; Doroff R; Chandler D
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2019 Jun; 35(6):1073-1080. PubMed ID: 30550346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patterns of primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in older Medicare patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Schenfeld J; Gong T; Henry D; Kelsh M; Gawade P; Peng Y; Bradbury BD; Li S
    Support Care Cancer; 2022 Jul; 30(7):6327-6338. PubMed ID: 35482126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use and effectiveness of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice:a retrospective observational study.
    Weycker D; Doroff R; Hanau A; Bowers C; Belani R; Chandler D; Lonshteyn A; Bensink M; Lyman GH
    BMC Cancer; 2019 Aug; 19(1):792. PubMed ID: 31399079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patterns of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in patients with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Gawade PL; Li S; Henry D; Smith N; Belani R; Kelsh MA; Bradbury BD
    Support Care Cancer; 2020 Sep; 28(9):4413-4424. PubMed ID: 31919669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia by day of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in US clinical practice from 2010 to 2015.
    Weycker D; Bensink M; Lonshteyn A; Doroff R; Chandler D
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2017 Dec; 33(12):2107-2113. PubMed ID: 28958157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative effectiveness of colony-stimulating factors for febrile neutropenia: a retrospective study.
    Tan H; Tomic K; Hurley D; Daniel G; Barron R; Malin J
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2011 Jan; 27(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 21091127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risks and consequences of travel burden on prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration and incidence of febrile neutropenia in an aged Medicare population.
    Stephens JM; Bensink M; Bowers C; Hollenbeak CS
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2019 Feb; 35(2):229-240. PubMed ID: 29661043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
    Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Villa G; Parthan A; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Somers L; Hoefkens C; Lyman GH
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):425-438. PubMed ID: 27928760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of chemotherapy regimens carrying a moderate or high risk of febrile neutropenia and the corresponding management of febrile neutropenia: an expert survey in breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Gerlier L; Lamotte M; Awada A; Bosly A; Bries G; Cocquyt V; Focan C; Henry S; Lalami Y; Machiels JP; Mebis J; Straetmans N; Verhoeven D; Somers L
    BMC Cancer; 2010 Nov; 10():642. PubMed ID: 21092320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trends in the use of primary prophylactic colony-stimulating factors and neutropenia-related hospitalization in elderly cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy in the USA: 1995-2015.
    Li S; Liu J; Guo H; Gawade PL; Kim C; Bensink ME; Chandler D
    Support Care Cancer; 2020 Jun; 28(6):2637-2649. PubMed ID: 31624920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Burden of Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Hospitalizations in US Clinical Practice, by Use and Patterns of Prophylaxis with Colony-Stimulating Factor.
    Weycker D; Li X; Tzivelekis S; Atwood M; Garcia J; Li Y; Reiner M; Lyman GH
    Support Care Cancer; 2017 Feb; 25(2):439-447. PubMed ID: 27734153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia with same-day versus next-day pegfilgrastim prophylaxis among patients aged ≥65 years: a retrospective evaluation using Medicare claims.
    Weycker D; Hanau A; Lonshteyn A; Bowers C; Bensink M; Garawin T; Chandler D
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2018 Sep; 34(9):1705-1711. PubMed ID: 29962268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors on febrile neutropenia during chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Wang L; Baser O; Kutikova L; Page JH; Barron R
    Support Care Cancer; 2015 Nov; 23(11):3131-40. PubMed ID: 25821144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primary vs secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim for the reduction of febrile neutropenia risk in patients receiving chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: cost-effectiveness analyses.
    Hill G; Barron R; Fust K; Skornicki ME; Taylor DC; Weinstein MC; Lyman GH
    J Med Econ; 2014 Jan; 17(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 24028444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Results of a prospective dose intensity and neutropenia prophylaxis evaluation programme (DIEPP) in cancer patients at risk of febrile neutropenia due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Mądry R; Popławska L; Haslbauer F; Šafanda M; Ghizdavescu D; Benkovicova J; Csőszi T; Mihaylov G; Niepel D; Jaeger C; Frkanova I; Macovei A; Staudigl C
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2016 Apr; 128(7-8):238-47. PubMed ID: 26745973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time trends in utilization of G-CSF prophylaxis and risk of febrile neutropenia in a Medicare population receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer.
    Goyal RK; Tzivelekis S; Rothman KJ; Candrilli SD; Kaye JA
    Support Care Cancer; 2018 Feb; 26(2):539-548. PubMed ID: 28921379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. G-CSF use in patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) as observed in clinical practice in Italy.
    Vitolo U; Angrili F; DeCosta L; Wetten S; Federico M
    Med Oncol; 2016 Dec; 33(12):139. PubMed ID: 27822615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attitudes of physicians toward assessing risk and using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as primary prophylaxis in patients receiving chemotherapy associated with an intermediate risk of febrile neutropenia.
    Freyer G; Kalinka-Warzocha E; Syrigos K; Marinca M; Tonini G; Ng SL; Wong ZW; Salar A; Steger G; Abdelsalam M; DeCosta L; Szabo Z
    Med Oncol; 2015 Oct; 32(10):236. PubMed ID: 26315712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients with metastatic cancer not receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor prophylaxis in US clinical practice.
    Averin A; Silvia A; Lamerato L; Richert-Boe K; Kaur M; Sundaresan D; Shah N; Hatfield M; Lawrence T; Lyman GH; Weycker D
    Support Care Cancer; 2021 Apr; 29(4):2179-2186. PubMed ID: 32880732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for the prevention of febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients with cancer.
    Aapro MS; Chaplin S; Cornes P; Howe S; Link H; Koptelova N; Mehl A; Di Palma M; Schroader BK; Terkola R
    Support Care Cancer; 2023 Sep; 31(10):581. PubMed ID: 37728795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.