404 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30550523)
1. Benefit of Mohs Micrographic Surgery Over Wide Local Excision for Melanoma of the Head and Neck: A Rational Approach to Treatment.
Demer AM; Vance KK; Cheraghi N; Reich HC; Lee PK
Dermatol Surg; 2019 Mar; 45(3):381-389. PubMed ID: 30550523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved overall survival of melanoma of the head and neck treated with Mohs micrographic surgery versus wide local excision.
Hanson J; Demer A; Liszewski W; Foman N; Maher I
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2020 Jan; 82(1):149-155. PubMed ID: 31473297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of Melanoma In Situ Treated With Mohs Micrographic Surgery Compared With Wide Local Excision.
Nosrati A; Berliner JG; Goel S; McGuire J; Morhenn V; de Souza JR; Yeniay Y; Singh R; Lee K; Nakamura M; Wu RR; Griffin A; Grimes B; Linos E; Chren MM; Grekin R; Wei ML
JAMA Dermatol; 2017 May; 153(5):436-441. PubMed ID: 28241261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Systematic Review of the Role of Mohs Micrographic Surgery in the Management of Early-Stage Melanoma of the Head and Neck.
Theunissen CCW; Lee MH; Murad FG; Waldman AH
Dermatol Surg; 2021 Sep; 47(9):1185-1189. PubMed ID: 34148999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma of the Head and Neck With Wide Local Excision Versus Mohs.
Namin AW; Oudin EM; Tassone PT; Galloway TLI; Dooley LM; Zitsch RP
Laryngoscope; 2021 Nov; 131(11):2490-2496. PubMed ID: 33844289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mohs micrographic surgery versus wide local excision for head and neck melanoma-
Phan K; Onggo J; Loya A
J Dermatolog Treat; 2020 Sep; 31(6):559-562. PubMed ID: 31264932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cutaneous head and neck melanoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery.
Bricca GM; Brodland DG; Ren D; Zitelli JA
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2005 Jan; 52(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 15627086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association of Mohs Micrographic Surgery vs Wide Local Excision With Overall Survival Outcomes for Patients With Melanoma of the Trunk and Extremities.
Demer AM; Hanson JL; Maher IA; Liszewski W
JAMA Dermatol; 2021 Jan; 157(1):84-89. PubMed ID: 33084853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wide local excision prior to sentinel lymph node biopsy for primary melanoma of the head and neck.
May MM; Lohse CM; Moore EJ; Price DL; Van Abel KM; Brewer JD; Janus JR
Int J Dermatol; 2019 Oct; 58(10):1184-1190. PubMed ID: 30968948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Slow Mohs Micrographic Surgery for Acral Melanoma Treatment in Korean Patients.
Seo J; Oh Y; Kim SK; Roh MR; Chung KY
Dermatol Surg; 2021 Feb; 47(2):e42-e46. PubMed ID: 33481431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic review and meta-analysis of local recurrence rates of head and neck cutaneous melanomas after wide local excision, Mohs micrographic surgery, or staged excision.
Bittar PG; Bittar JM; Etzkorn JR; Brewer JD; Aizman L; Shin TM; Sobanko JF; Higgins HW; Giordano CN; Cohen JV; Pride R; Wan MT; Leitenberger JJ; Bar AA; Aasi S; Bordeaux JS; Miller CJ
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2021 Sep; 85(3):681-692. PubMed ID: 33961921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) for melanoma in situ (MIS) of the trunk and proximal extremities.
Stigall LE; Brodland DG; Zitelli JA
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2016 Nov; 75(5):1015-1021. PubMed ID: 27473456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of outcomes for malignant melanoma of the face treated using Mohs micrographic surgery and wide local excision.
Chin-Lenn L; Murynka T; McKinnon JG; Arlette JP
Dermatol Surg; 2013 Nov; 39(11):1637-45. PubMed ID: 24164702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low recurrence rates for in situ and invasive melanomas using Mohs micrographic surgery with melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (MART-1) immunostaining: tissue processing methodology to optimize pathologic staging and margin assessment.
Etzkorn JR; Sobanko JF; Elenitsas R; Newman JG; Goldbach H; Shin TM; Miller CJ
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2015 May; 72(5):840-50. PubMed ID: 25774012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk Factors Predicting Positive Margins at Primary Wide Local Excision of Cutaneous Melanoma.
Mangold AR; Skinner R; Dueck AC; Sekulic A; Pockaj BA
Dermatol Surg; 2016 May; 42(5):646-52. PubMed ID: 27082057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Upstaging of melanoma in situ and lentigo maligna treated with Mohs micrographic surgery rarely results in additional surgical management.
Levoska MA; Schmults CD; Waldman AH
Arch Dermatol Res; 2020 Dec; 312(10):753-756. PubMed ID: 32002653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences in sentinel lymph node biopsy utilization in eligible melanoma patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery or wide local excision: A population-based logistic regression model and survival analysis.
Knackstedt TJ
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 Apr; 88(4):848-855. PubMed ID: 36368376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mohs Micrographic Surgery Using MART-1 Immunostain in the Treatment of Invasive Melanoma and Melanoma In Situ.
Valentín-Nogueras SM; Brodland DG; Zitelli JA; González-Sepúlveda L; Nazario CM
Dermatol Surg; 2016 Jun; 42(6):733-44. PubMed ID: 27158886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Excision margins for melanoma in situ on the head and neck-A single-center 10-year retrospective review of treatment with Mohs micrographic surgery.
Tate JA; Matsumoto A; Greif C; Lim J; Nijhawan RI; Srivastava D
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2024 Jun; 90(6):1226-1231. PubMed ID: 38253130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: wide local excision vs. Mohs micrographic surgery.
Paradisi A; Abeni D; Rusciani A; Cigna E; Wolter M; Scuderi N; Rusciani L; Kaufmann R; Podda M
Cancer Treat Rev; 2008 Dec; 34(8):728-36. PubMed ID: 18684568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
