581 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30552195)
1. Towards Quantitative Microbiome Community Profiling Using Internal Standards.
Lin Y; Gifford S; Ducklow H; Schofield O; Cassar N
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2019 Mar; 85(5):. PubMed ID: 30552195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Species-level bacterial community profiling of the healthy sinonasal microbiome using Pacific Biosciences sequencing of full-length 16S rRNA genes.
Earl JP; Adappa ND; Krol J; Bhat AS; Balashov S; Ehrlich RL; Palmer JN; Workman AD; Blasetti M; Sen B; Hammond J; Cohen NA; Ehrlich GD; Mell JC
Microbiome; 2018 Oct; 6(1):190. PubMed ID: 30352611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bacterial and Eukaryotic Small-Subunit Amplicon Data Do Not Provide a Quantitative Picture of Microbial Communities, but They Are Reliable in the Context of Ecological Interpretations.
Piwosz K; Shabarova T; Pernthaler J; Posch T; Šimek K; Porcal P; Salcher MM
mSphere; 2020 Mar; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 32132159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of Eukaryotic Microbiome Using 18S Amplicon Sequencing.
Popovic A; Parkinson J
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():29-48. PubMed ID: 30298246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Absolute quantification of microbial taxon abundances.
Props R; Kerckhof FM; Rubbens P; De Vrieze J; Hernandez Sanabria E; Waegeman W; Monsieurs P; Hammes F; Boon N
ISME J; 2017 Feb; 11(2):584-587. PubMed ID: 27612291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adjusting microbiome profiles for differences in microbial load by spike-in bacteria.
Stämmler F; Gläsner J; Hiergeist A; Holler E; Weber D; Oefner PJ; Gessner A; Spang R
Microbiome; 2016 Jun; 4(1):28. PubMed ID: 27329048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.
Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How to Count Our Microbes? The Effect of Different Quantitative Microbiome Profiling Approaches.
Galazzo G; van Best N; Benedikter BJ; Janssen K; Bervoets L; Driessen C; Oomen M; Lucchesi M; van Eijck PH; Becker HEF; Hornef MW; Savelkoul PH; Stassen FRM; Wolffs PF; Penders J
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2020; 10():403. PubMed ID: 32850498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Host DNA depletion efficiency of microbiome DNA enrichment methods in infected tissue samples.
Heravi FS; Zakrzewski M; Vickery K; Hu H
J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Mar; 170():105856. PubMed ID: 32007505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved DNA Extraction and Amplification Strategy for 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon-Based Microbiome Studies.
Hong BY; Driscoll M; Gratalo D; Jarvie T; Weinstock GM
Int J Mol Sci; 2024 Mar; 25(5):. PubMed ID: 38474213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comprehensive method for amplicon-based and metagenomic characterization of viruses, bacteria, and eukaryotes in freshwater samples.
Uyaguari-Diaz MI; Chan M; Chaban BL; Croxen MA; Finke JF; Hill JE; Peabody MA; Van Rossum T; Suttle CA; Brinkman FS; Isaac-Renton J; Prystajecky NA; Tang P
Microbiome; 2016 Jul; 4(1):20. PubMed ID: 27391119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A quantitative SMRT cell sequencing method for ribosomal amplicons.
Jones BM; Kustka AB
J Microbiol Methods; 2017 Apr; 135():77-84. PubMed ID: 28159629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genome-Based Targeted Sequencing as a Reproducible Microbial Community Profiling Assay.
Benjamino J; Leopold B; Phillips D; Adams MD
mSphere; 2021 Apr; 6(2):. PubMed ID: 33827913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative PCR provides a simple and accessible method for quantitative microbiota profiling.
Jian C; Luukkonen P; Yki-Järvinen H; Salonen A; Korpela K
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227285. PubMed ID: 31940382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Linking patterns of net community production and marine microbial community structure in the western North Atlantic.
Wang S; Lin Y; Gifford S; Eveleth R; Cassar N
ISME J; 2018 May; 12(11):2582-2595. PubMed ID: 29934639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-throughput qPCR and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing as complementary methods for the investigation of the cheese microbiota.
Dreier M; Meola M; Berthoud H; Shani N; Wechsler D; Junier P
BMC Microbiol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):48. PubMed ID: 35130830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Managing Contamination and Diverse Bacterial Loads in 16S rRNA Deep Sequencing of Clinical Samples: Implications of the Law of Small Numbers.
Dyrhovden R; Rippin M; Øvrebø KK; Nygaard RM; Ulvestad E; Kommedal Ø
mBio; 2021 Jun; 12(3):e0059821. PubMed ID: 34101489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sediment-associated microbial community profiling: sample pre-processing through sequential membrane filtration for 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing.
Serrana JM; Watanabe K
BMC Microbiol; 2022 Jan; 22(1):33. PubMed ID: 35057747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. High-resolution ISR amplicon sequencing reveals personalized oral microbiome.
Mukherjee C; Beall CJ; Griffen AL; Leys EJ
Microbiome; 2018 Sep; 6(1):153. PubMed ID: 30185233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Signatures within the esophageal microbiome are associated with host genetics, age, and disease.
Deshpande NP; Riordan SM; Castaño-Rodríguez N; Wilkins MR; Kaakoush NO
Microbiome; 2018 Dec; 6(1):227. PubMed ID: 30558669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
