These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30552957)

  • 1. Living network meta-analysis was feasible when considering the pace of evidence generation.
    Créquit P; Martin-Montoya T; Attiche N; Trinquart L; Vivot A; Ravaud P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 108():10-16. PubMed ID: 30552957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic screening using word embeddings achieved high sensitivity and workload reduction for updating living network meta-analyses.
    Lerner I; Créquit P; Ravaud P; Atal I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 108():86-94. PubMed ID: 30528791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Living cumulative network meta-analysis to reduce waste in research: A paradigmatic shift for systematic reviews?
    Vandvik PO; Brignardello-Petersen R; Guyatt GH
    BMC Med; 2016 Mar; 14():59. PubMed ID: 27025849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Live cumulative network meta-analysis: protocol for second-line treatments in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with wild-type or unknown status for epidermal growth factor receptor.
    Créquit P; Trinquart L; Ravaud P
    BMJ Open; 2016 Aug; 6(8):e011841. PubMed ID: 27489157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Overlapping network meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies.
    Naudet F; Schuit E; Ioannidis JPA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 29040566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid methods including network meta-analysis to produce evidence in clinical decision support: a decision analysis.
    Eiring Ø; Brurberg KG; Nytrøen K; Nylenna M
    Syst Rev; 2018 Oct; 7(1):168. PubMed ID: 30342549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improvement needed in the network geometry and inconsistency of Cochrane network meta-analyses: a cross-sectional survey.
    Gao Y; Ge L; Ma X; Shen X; Liu M; Tian J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 113():214-227. PubMed ID: 31150834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Continuously updated network meta-analysis and statistical monitoring for timely decision-making.
    Nikolakopoulou A; Mavridis D; Egger M; Salanti G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1312-1330. PubMed ID: 27587588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meta-Review: Network Meta-Analyses in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
    Cortese S; Tomlinson A; Cipriani A
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2019 Feb; 58(2):167-179. PubMed ID: 30738544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of reporting bias in network meta-analysis of antidepressant placebo-controlled trials.
    Trinquart L; Abbé A; Ravaud P
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e35219. PubMed ID: 22536359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adjustment for reporting bias in network meta-analysis of antidepressant trials.
    Trinquart L; Chatellier G; Ravaud P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Sep; 12():150. PubMed ID: 23016799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Reporting Standard Guidelines of Network Meta-Analyses in Physical Therapy: A Systematic Review.
    Cho SH; Shin IS
    Healthcare (Basel); 2022 Nov; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 36553895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Node-making process in network meta-analysis of nonpharmacological treatment are poorly reported.
    James A; Yavchitz A; Ravaud P; Boutron I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 May; 97():95-102. PubMed ID: 29196202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Time-to-update of systematic reviews relative to the availability of new evidence.
    Bashir R; Surian D; Dunn AG
    Syst Rev; 2018 Nov; 7(1):195. PubMed ID: 30447694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Critical evaluation of reporting quality of network meta-analyses assessing the effectiveness of acupuncture.
    Bae K; Shin IS
    Complement Ther Clin Pract; 2021 Nov; 45():101459. PubMed ID: 34388562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative Efficacy of Treatments for Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma: A Systematic Literature Review and Network Meta-analysis.
    Maiese EM; Ainsworth C; Le Moine JG; Ahdesmäki O; Bell J; Hawe E
    Clin Ther; 2018 Mar; 40(3):480-494.e23. PubMed ID: 29500140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis feasibility study to assess the comparative efficacy and comparative effectiveness of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines.
    McGirr A; Iqbal SM; Izurieta P; Talarico C; Luijken J; Redig J; Newson RS
    Hum Vaccin Immunother; 2019; 15(11):2713-2724. PubMed ID: 31216216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods and characteristics of published network meta-analyses using individual patient data: protocol for a scoping review.
    Veroniki AA; Soobiah C; Tricco AC; Elliott MJ; Straus SE
    BMJ Open; 2015 Apr; 5(4):e007103. PubMed ID: 25926144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Anticoagulant selection for patients with VTE-Evidence from a systematic literature review of network meta-analyses.
    Cohen AT; Berger SE; Milenković D; Hill NR; Lister S
    Pharmacol Res; 2019 May; 143():166-177. PubMed ID: 30905806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.