These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
439 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30553631)
1. Long-term outcomes following minimally invasive and open esophagectomy in Finland: A population-based study. Sihvo E; Helminen O; Gunn J; Sipilä JOT; Rautava P; Kytö V Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 45(6):1099-1104. PubMed ID: 30553631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimally invasive esophagectomy attenuates the postoperative inflammatory response and improves survival compared with open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis. Yamashita K; Watanabe M; Mine S; Toihata T; Fukudome I; Okamura A; Yuda M; Hayami M; Ishizuka N; Imamura Y Surg Endosc; 2018 Nov; 32(11):4443-4450. PubMed ID: 29644466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes. Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A propensity-matched analysis comparing survival after primary minimally invasive esophagectomy followed by adjuvant therapy to neoadjuvant therapy for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Zahoor H; Luketich JD; Levy RM; Awais O; Winger DG; Gibson MK; Nason KS J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Feb; 149(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 25454907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and left transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: a propensity score-matched analysis. Wang Q; Wu Z; Zhan T; Fang S; Zhang S; Shen G; Wu M BMC Cancer; 2019 May; 19(1):500. PubMed ID: 31132995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survival After Esophagectomy: A Propensity-Matched Study of Different Surgical Approaches. Weksler B; Sullivan JL Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct; 104(4):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 28760463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective comparison of totally minimally invasive versus open Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Noble F; Kelly JJ; Bailey IS; Byrne JP; Underwood TJ; Dis Esophagus; 2013 Apr; 26(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 23551569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Thoracolaparoscopic vs Open McKeown's Esophagectomy. Wang K; Zhong J; Liu Q; Lin P; Fu J Ann Thorac Surg; 2022 Feb; 113(2):473-481. PubMed ID: 33621558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes With Open and Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy After Neoadjuvant Therapy. Tapias LF; Mathisen DJ; Wright CD; Wain JC; Gaissert HA; Muniappan A; Lanuti M; Donahue DM; Morse CR Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 101(3):1097-103. PubMed ID: 26652140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides equivalent oncologic outcomes to open esophagectomy for locally advanced (stage II or III) esophageal carcinoma. Singh RK; Pham TH; Diggs BS; Perkins S; Hunter JG Arch Surg; 2011 Jun; 146(6):711-4. PubMed ID: 21690448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis. Yerokun BA; Sun Z; Yang CJ; Gulack BC; Speicher PJ; Adam MA; D'Amico TA; Onaitis MW; Harpole DH; Berry MF; Hartwig MG Ann Thorac Surg; 2016 Aug; 102(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 27157326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does the Approach Matter? Comparing Survival in Robotic, Minimally Invasive, and Open Esophagectomies. Espinoza-Mercado F; Imai TA; Borgella JD; Sarkissian A; Serna-Gallegos D; Alban RF; Soukiasian HJ Ann Thorac Surg; 2019 Feb; 107(2):378-385. PubMed ID: 30312615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimal invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant treatments. Chen D; Wang W; Mo J; Ren Q; Miao H; Chen Y; Wen Z BMC Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):145. PubMed ID: 33563244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short-Term Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy: A Population-Based Study from Finland and Sweden. Kauppila JH; Helminen O; Kytö V; Gunn J; Lagergren J; Sihvo E Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):326-332. PubMed ID: 29094248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early outcome of thoracoscopic and hybrid esophagectomy: Propensity-matched comparative analysis. Bonavina L; Scolari F; Aiolfi A; Bonitta G; Sironi A; Saino G; Asti E Surgery; 2016 Apr; 159(4):1073-81. PubMed ID: 26422764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy). Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]