These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30553935)

  • 1. When humans behave like monkeys: Feedback delays and extensive practice increase the efficiency of speeded decisions.
    Evans NJ; Hawkins GE
    Cognition; 2019 Mar; 184():11-18. PubMed ID: 30553935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Self-reported strategies in decisions under risk: role of feedback, reasoning abilities, executive functions, short-term-memory, and working memory.
    Schiebener J; Brand M
    Cogn Process; 2015 Nov; 16(4):401-16. PubMed ID: 26289475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does the feedback from previous trials influence current decisions? A study on the role of feedback processing in making decisions under explicit risk conditions.
    Brand M
    J Neuropsychol; 2008 Sep; 2(2):431-43. PubMed ID: 19824172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative approaches to studying strategy: towards an evolutionary account of primate decision making.
    Brosnan SF; Beran MJ; Parrish AE; Price SA; Wilson BJ
    Evol Psychol; 2013 Jul; 11(3):606-27. PubMed ID: 23864296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual differences in error tolerance in humans: Neurophysiological evidences.
    Padrao G; Mallorquí A; Cucurell D; Rodriguez-Fornells A
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 15(4):808-21. PubMed ID: 26018781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decision making with and without feedback: the role of intelligence, strategies, executive functions, and cognitive styles.
    Brand M; Laier C; Pawlikowski M; Markowitsch HJ
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Nov; 31(8):984-98. PubMed ID: 19358007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The hare and the tortoise: emphasizing speed can change the evidence used to make decisions.
    Rae B; Heathcote A; Donkin C; Averell L; Brown S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1226-43. PubMed ID: 24797438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frontal, Striatal, and Medial Temporal Sensitivity to Value Distinguishes Risk-Taking from Risk-Aversive Older Adults during Decision Making.
    Goh JO; Su YS; Tang YJ; McCarrey AC; Tereshchenko A; Elkins W; Resnick SM
    J Neurosci; 2016 Dec; 36(49):12498-12509. PubMed ID: 27927964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortical β Power Reflects a Neural Implementation of Decision Boundary Collapse in Speeded Decisions.
    Kirschner H; Fischer AG; Danielmeier C; Klein TA; Ullsperger M
    J Neurosci; 2024 Mar; 44(13):. PubMed ID: 38360748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decision-making impairments in Parkinson's disease as a by-product of defective cost-benefit analysis and feedback processing.
    Ryterska A; Jahanshahi M; Osman M
    Neurodegener Dis Manag; 2014; 4(4):317-27. PubMed ID: 25313988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. People adopt optimal policies in simple decision-making, after practice and guidance.
    Evans NJ; Brown SD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):597-606. PubMed ID: 27562760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Oscillatory activity and phase-amplitude coupling in the human medial frontal cortex during decision making.
    Cohen MX; Elger CE; Fell J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 21(2):390-402. PubMed ID: 18510444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The evolutionary roots of human decision making.
    Santos LR; Rosati AG
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2015 Jan; 66():321-47. PubMed ID: 25559115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blunted feedback processing during risky decision making in adolescents with a parental history of substance use disorders.
    Euser AS; Greaves-Lord K; Crowley MJ; Evans BE; Huizink AC; Franken IH
    Dev Psychopathol; 2013 Nov; 25(4 Pt 1):1119-36. PubMed ID: 24229553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adaptive History Biases Result from Confidence-Weighted Accumulation of past Choices.
    Braun A; Urai AE; Donner TH
    J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 38(10):2418-2429. PubMed ID: 29371318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Striatal activation reflects urgency in perceptual decision making.
    van Maanen L; Fontanesi L; Hawkins GE; Forstmann BU
    Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 139():294-303. PubMed ID: 27355435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Executive functions, categorization of probabilities, and learning from feedback: what does really matter for decision making under explicit risk conditions?
    Schiebener J; Zamarian L; Delazer M; Brand M
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2011 Nov; 33(9):1025-39. PubMed ID: 22082084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissociation of decision-making under ambiguity and decision-making under risk in patients with Parkinson's disease: a neuropsychological and psychophysiological study.
    Euteneuer F; Schaefer F; Stuermer R; Boucsein W; Timmermann L; Barbe MT; Ebersbach G; Otto J; Kessler J; Kalbe E
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Nov; 47(13):2882-90. PubMed ID: 19545579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are perceptuo-motor decisions really more optimal than cognitive decisions?
    Jarvstad A; Hahn U; Warren PA; Rushton SK
    Cognition; 2014 Mar; 130(3):397-416. PubMed ID: 24413063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sequential Sampling Models in Cognitive Neuroscience: Advantages, Applications, and Extensions.
    Forstmann BU; Ratcliff R; Wagenmakers EJ
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2016; 67():641-66. PubMed ID: 26393872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.