These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30554059)

  • 1. A hierarchical machine learning classification approach for secondary task identification from observed driving behavior data.
    Osman OA; Hajij M; Karbalaieali S; Ishak S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb; 123():274-281. PubMed ID: 30554059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of driver engagement in secondary tasks from observed naturalistic driving behavior.
    Ye M; Osman OA; Ishak S; Hashemi B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():385-391. PubMed ID: 28719829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Teens' distracted driving behavior: Prevalence and predictors.
    Gershon P; Zhu C; Klauer SG; Dingus T; Simons-Morton B
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():157-161. PubMed ID: 29203014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Driving behaviour while self-regulating mobile phone interactions: A human-machine system approach.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Demmel S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():253-262. PubMed ID: 29653674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distracted Driving, Visual Inattention, and Crash Risk Among Teenage Drivers.
    Gershon P; Sita KR; Zhu C; Ehsani JP; Klauer SG; Dingus TA; Simons-Morton BG
    Am J Prev Med; 2019 Apr; 56(4):494-500. PubMed ID: 30799162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using SHRP 2 naturalistic driving data to assess drivers' speed choice while being engaged in different secondary tasks.
    Schneidereit T; Petzoldt T; Keinath A; Krems JF
    J Safety Res; 2017 Sep; 62():33-42. PubMed ID: 28882275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Driving context influences drivers' decision to engage in visual-manual phone tasks: Evidence from a naturalistic driving study.
    Tivesten E; Dozza M
    J Safety Res; 2015 Jun; 53():87-96. PubMed ID: 25934001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Apr; 101():67-77. PubMed ID: 28189943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The driver-level crash risk associated with daily cellphone use and cellphone use while driving.
    Atwood J; Guo F; Fitch G; Dingus TA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Oct; 119():149-154. PubMed ID: 30031295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in the sources of distracted driving among Northern Virginia drivers in 2014 and 2018: A comparison of results from two roadside observation surveys.
    Kidd DG; Chaudhary NK
    J Safety Res; 2019 Feb; 68():131-138. PubMed ID: 30876504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using European naturalistic driving data to assess secondary task engagement when stopped at a red light.
    Morgenstern T; Petzoldt T; Krems JF; Naujoks F; Keinath A
    J Safety Res; 2020 Jun; 73():235-243. PubMed ID: 32563398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Mate! I'm running 10 min late": An investigation into the self-regulation of mobile phone tasks while driving.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jan; 122():134-142. PubMed ID: 30343165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Driver distraction by smartphone use (WhatsApp) in different age groups.
    Ortiz C; Ortiz-Peregrina S; Castro JJ; Casares-López M; Salas C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():239-249. PubMed ID: 29723735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Classification of Driver Distraction: A Comprehensive Analysis of Feature Generation, Machine Learning, and Input Measures.
    McDonald AD; Ferris TK; Wiener TA
    Hum Factors; 2020 Sep; 62(6):1019-1035. PubMed ID: 31237788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Comparative Study of Accident Risk Related to Speech-Based and Handheld Texting during a Sudden Braking Event in Urban Road Environments.
    Fu R; Chen Y; Xu Q; Guo Y; Yuan W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32781529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: A simulator study.
    Wandtner B; Schumacher M; Schmidt EA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 27082493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of age on crash risk associated with driver distraction.
    Guo F; Klauer SG; Fang Y; Hankey JM; Antin JF; Perez MA; Lee SE; Dingus TA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Feb; 46(1):258-265. PubMed ID: 28338711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Creating the environment for driver distraction: A thematic framework of sociotechnical factors.
    Parnell KJ; Stanton NA; Plant KL
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Apr; 68():213-228. PubMed ID: 29409637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cellphone-distracted crashes of novice teen drivers: Understanding associations of contributing factors for crash severity levels and cellphone usage types.
    Hossain MM; Zhou H; Rahman MA; Das S; Sun X
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(7):390-397. PubMed ID: 35867603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Teen Drivers' Perceptions of Inattention and Cell Phone Use While Driving.
    McDonald CC; Sommers MS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2(0):S52-8. PubMed ID: 26436243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.