These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3055589)

  • 1. In vitro estimation and imaging of attenuation coefficients and instantaneous frequency for breast tissue characterization.
    Kubota M; Yamashita Y; Iga M; Tajima T; Mitomi T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1988; 14 Suppl 1():163-74. PubMed ID: 3055589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Duplex sonography of the breast.
    Jackson VP
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1988; 14 Suppl 1():131-7. PubMed ID: 3055587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance evaluation of the spectral centroid downshift method for attenuation estimation.
    Samimi K; Varghese T
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 May; 62(5):871-80. PubMed ID: 25965681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frequency dependence of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter in breast tissue.
    D'Astous FT; Foster FS
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1986 Oct; 12(10):795-808. PubMed ID: 3541334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experimental Measurements of Ultrasound Attenuation in Human Chest Wall and Assessment of the Mechanical Index for Lung Ultrasound.
    Patterson B; Miller DL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Jun; 46(6):1442-1454. PubMed ID: 32217030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro measurement of the frequency-dependent attenuation in cancellous bone between 0.2 and 2 MHz.
    Chaffaï S; Padilla F; Berger G; Laugier P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):1281-9. PubMed ID: 11008828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microprocessor-base system for ultrasonic tissue characterization.
    Bhagat PK; Kadaba MP; Gupta VN; Wu V
    Med Instrum; 1980; 14(4):220-4. PubMed ID: 7412654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hybrid spectral domain method for attenuation slope estimation.
    Kim H; Varghese T
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 34(11):1808-19. PubMed ID: 18621468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic Properties of Breast Fat.
    Nasief HG; Rosado-Mendez IM; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):2007-16. PubMed ID: 26446820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time-varying autoregressive spectral estimation for ultrasound attenuation in tissue characterization.
    Girault JM; Ossant F; Ouahabi A; Kouame D; Patat F
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1998; 45(3):650-9. PubMed ID: 18244216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential attenuation imaging for the characterization of high intensity focused ultrasound lesions.
    Ribault M; Chapelon JY; Cathignol D; Gelet A
    Ultrason Imaging; 1998 Jul; 20(3):160-77. PubMed ID: 9921617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-frequency ultrasound characterization of microporous biointegrable polymers in cornea using acoustic parameters.
    Lheureux D; Saïed A; Werner L; Legeais JM; Berger G
    Ultrasonics; 2000 Mar; 38(1-8):391-5. PubMed ID: 10829694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Global breast attenuation:control group and benign breast diseases.
    Berger G; Laugier P; Thalabard JC; Perrin J
    Ultrason Imaging; 1990 Jan; 12(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 2184568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial variation of acoustic parameters in human skin: an in vitro study between 22 and 45 MHz.
    Lebertre M; Ossant F; Vaillant L; Diridollou S; Patat F
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 May; 28(5):599-615. PubMed ID: 12079697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variation of transducer frequency output and receiver band-pass characteristics for improved detection and image characterization of solid breast masses.
    Kelly-Fry E; Morris ST; Jackson VP; Holden RW; Sanghvi NT
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1988; 14 Suppl 1():143-61. PubMed ID: 2847388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro chronic hepatic disease characterization with a multiparametric ultrasonic approach.
    Meziri M; Pereira WC; Abdelwahab A; Degott C; Laugier P
    Ultrasonics; 2005 Mar; 43(5):305-13. PubMed ID: 15737380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasound tissue characterization of breast biopsy specimens.
    Edmonds PD; Mortensen CL; Hill JR; Holland SK; Jensen JF; Schattner P; Valdes AD
    Ultrason Imaging; 1991 Apr; 13(2):162-85. PubMed ID: 1650048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatially Variant Ultrasound Attenuation Mapping Using a Regularized Linear Least-Squares Approach.
    Birdi J; D'hooge J; Bertrand A
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2022 May; 69(5):1596-1609. PubMed ID: 35263252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical performance of a cone/annular array ultrasound breast scanner.
    Fishell EK; Foster FS; Connor T; Khodai M; Harasciewicz K; Hunt JW
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1990; 16(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 2204163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of pathological state on the acoustic attenuation coefficient slope of liver.
    Afschrift M; Cuvelier C; Ringoir S; Barbier F
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1987 Mar; 13(3):135-9. PubMed ID: 3296372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.