159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30556331)
21. Quantum dots-based double imaging combined with organic dye imaging to establish an automatic computerized method for cancer Ki67 measurement.
Wang LW; Qu AP; Liu WL; Chen JM; Yuan JP; Wu H; Li Y; Liu J
Sci Rep; 2016 Feb; 6():20564. PubMed ID: 26839163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Automated assessment of Ki-67 in breast cancer: the utility of digital image analysis using virtual triple staining and whole slide imaging.
Hida AI; Omanovic D; Pedersen L; Oshiro Y; Ogura T; Nomura T; Kurebayashi J; Kanomata N; Moriya T
Histopathology; 2020 Sep; 77(3):471-480. PubMed ID: 32578891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of tissue sampling on accuracy of Ki67 immunohistochemistry evaluation in breast cancer.
Besusparis J; Plancoulaine B; Rasmusson A; Augulis R; Green AR; Ellis IO; Laurinaviciene A; Herlin P; Laurinavicius A
Diagn Pathol; 2016 Aug; 11(1):82. PubMed ID: 27576949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An optimized image analysis algorithm for detecting nuclear signals in digital whole slides for histopathology.
Paulik R; Micsik T; Kiszler G; Kaszál P; Székely J; Paulik N; Várhalmi E; Prémusz V; Krenács T; Molnár B
Cytometry A; 2017 Jun; 91(6):595-608. PubMed ID: 28472544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A simple digital image analysis system for automated Ki67 assessment in primary breast cancer.
Alataki A; Zabaglo L; Tovey H; Dodson A; Dowsett M
Histopathology; 2021 Aug; 79(2):200-209. PubMed ID: 33590538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative study of two complementary proliferation markers in 200 breast carcinomas: Ki67 and mitotic index.
El Amine O; Ouni R; Adouni O; Goucha A; Ben Hassouna J; Rahal K; El May A; Gamoudi A
Tunis Med; 2016 Oct; 94(8-9):587-593. PubMed ID: 28685793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparative study of two complementary proliferation markers in 200 breast carcinomas: Ki67 and mitotic index.
El Amine O; Ouni R; Adouni O; Goucha A; Ben Hassouna J; Rahal K; El May A; Gamoudi A
Tunis Med; 2016 Oct; 94(10):587-593. PubMed ID: 28972249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ki67 assessment in breast cancer: an update.
Penault-Llorca F; Radosevic-Robin N
Pathology; 2017 Feb; 49(2):166-171. PubMed ID: 28065411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Automated characterization and counting of Ki-67 protein for breast cancer prognosis: A quantitative immunohistochemistry approach.
Mungle T; Tewary S; Arun I; Basak B; Agarwal S; Ahmed R; Chatterjee S; Maity AK; Chakraborty C
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Feb; 139():149-161. PubMed ID: 28187885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Objective quantification of the Ki67 proliferative index in neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system: a comparison of digital image analysis with manual methods.
Tang LH; Gonen M; Hedvat C; Modlin IM; Klimstra DS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Dec; 36(12):1761-70. PubMed ID: 23026928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantitative cytological assessment of Ki67 and AgNORs using computer-digitized image analysis of four clinicopathological breast lesions.
Zaitoun AM; Ebbs SR
Cytopathology; 2000 Aug; 11(4):243-54. PubMed ID: 10983724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnostic value of p53 and ki67 immunostaining for distinguishing benign from malignant serous effusions.
Hafez NH; Tahoun NS
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst; 2011 Dec; 23(4):155-62. PubMed ID: 22776843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessment of the Ki67 labeling index: a Japanese validation ring study.
Niikura N; Sakatani T; Arima N; Ohi Y; Honma N; Kanomata N; Yoshida K; Kadoya T; Tamaki K; Kumaki N; Iwamoto T; Sugie T; Moriya T
Breast Cancer; 2016 Jan; 23(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 24794952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Flow cytometry vs. Ki67 labelling index in breast cancer: a prospective evaluation of 181 cases.
Martínez-Arribas F; Núñez MJ; Piqueras V; Lucas AR; Sánchez J; Tejerina A; Schneider J
Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(1A):295-8. PubMed ID: 12017306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effect of tumor heterogeneity on the assessment of Ki67 labeling index in well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors metastatic to the liver: implications for prognostic stratification.
Yang Z; Tang LH; Klimstra DS
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Jun; 35(6):853-60. PubMed ID: 21566513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Digital image analysis of Ki67 in hot spots is superior to both manual Ki67 and mitotic counts in breast cancer.
Stålhammar G; Robertson S; Wedlund L; Lippert M; Rantalainen M; Bergh J; Hartman J
Histopathology; 2018 May; 72(6):974-989. PubMed ID: 29220095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ki67 index in breast cancer: correlation with other prognostic markers and potential in pakistani patients.
Haroon S; Hashmi AA; Khurshid A; Kanpurwala MA; Mujtuba S; Malik B; Faridi N
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(7):4353-8. PubMed ID: 23992002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A new automatic image analysis method for assessing estrogen receptors' status in breast tissue specimens.
Mouelhi A; Sayadi M; Fnaiech F; Mrad K; Ben Romdhane K
Comput Biol Med; 2013 Dec; 43(12):2263-77. PubMed ID: 24290943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of the prognostic value of genomic grade index, Ki67 expression and mitotic activity index in early node-positive breast cancer patients.
Bertucci F; Finetti P; Roche H; Le Doussal JM; Marisa L; Martin AL; Lacroix-Triki M; Blanc-Fournier C; Jacquemier J; Peyro-Saint-Paul H; Viens P; Sotiriou C; Birnbaum D; Penault-Llorca F
Ann Oncol; 2013 Mar; 24(3):625-32. PubMed ID: 23117074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Digital immunohistochemistry wizard: image analysis-assisted stereology tool to produce reference data set for calibration and quality control.
Plancoulaine B; Laurinaviciene A; Meskauskas R; Baltrusaityte I; Besusparis J; Herlin P; Laurinavicius A
Diagn Pathol; 2014; 9 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S8. PubMed ID: 25565221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
