These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Ankle Fractures: The Current State of Online Patient Information. Noback PC; Trupia EP; Dziesinski LK; Sarpong NO; Trofa DP; Vosseller JT Foot Ankle Spec; 2021 Aug; 14(4):324-333. PubMed ID: 32674596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Readability of Patient Education Materials in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R): A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study. Han A; Carayannopoulos AG PM R; 2020 Apr; 12(4):368-373. PubMed ID: 31361388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Readability of American Society of Metabolic Surgery's Patient Information Publications. Massie PL; Arshad SA; Auyang ED J Surg Res; 2024 Jan; 293():727-732. PubMed ID: 37862852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Readability of patient education materials in ophthalmology: a single-institution study and systematic review. Williams AM; Muir KW; Rosdahl JA BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 16():133. PubMed ID: 27487960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur. Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to uterine artery embolization. Shukla P; Sanghvi SP; Lelkes VM; Kumar A; Contractor S J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):469-74. PubMed ID: 23452554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Readability of Online Spine Patient Education Resources. Luciani AM; Foster BK; Hayes D; DelSole EM World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e640-e644. PubMed ID: 35342026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of search term on the quality and accuracy of online information regarding distal radius fractures. Dy CJ; Taylor SA; Patel RM; Kitay A; Roberts TR; Daluiski A J Hand Surg Am; 2012 Sep; 37(9):1881-7. PubMed ID: 22857909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Zenker's Diverticulum: Readability and Quality of Online Written Education Materials. Shneyderman M; Davis R; Snow G; Dhar S; Akst LM Dysphagia; 2022 Dec; 37(6):1461-1467. PubMed ID: 35092487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Online educational materials for appendectomy patients have good quality but poor readability. Rai R; Landsberg A; Nguyen A; Wiseman SM Am J Surg; 2021 Jun; 221(6):1203-1210. PubMed ID: 33712262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Readability assessment of Internet-based patient education materials related to endoscopic sinus surgery. Cherla DV; Sanghvi S; Choudhry OJ; Liu JK; Eloy JA Laryngoscope; 2012 Aug; 122(8):1649-54. PubMed ID: 22685030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Internet search term affects the quality and accuracy of online information about developmental hip dysplasia. Fabricant PD; Dy CJ; Patel RM; Blanco JS; Doyle SM J Pediatr Orthop; 2013 Jun; 33(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 23653022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the quality and readability of thyroplasty information on the Internet. Ting K; Hu A J Voice; 2014 May; 28(3):378-81. PubMed ID: 24314830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to facial fractures. Sanghvi S; Cherla DV; Shukla PA; Eloy JA Laryngoscope; 2012 Sep; 122(9):1943-8. PubMed ID: 22833340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to mammography for breast cancer screening. AlKhalili R; Shukla PA; Patel RH; Sanghvi S; Hubbi B Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 25488695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]