These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30556715)

  • 1. Short- and long-term memory tasks predict working memory performance, and vice versa.
    Neath I; Saint-Aubin J; Bireta TJ; Gabel AJ; Hudson CG; Surprenant AM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Jun; 73(2):79-93. PubMed ID: 30556715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From Brown-Peterson to continual distractor via operation span: A SIMPLE account of complex span.
    Neath I; VanWormer LA; Bireta TJ; Surprenant AM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Sep; 68(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 25383478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does semantic long-term memory impact refreshing in verbal working memory?
    Camos V; Mora G; Oftinger AL; Mariz Elsig S; Schneider P; Vergauwe E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1664-1682. PubMed ID: 30299130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The stability of working memory: do previous tasks influence complex span?
    Healey MK; Hasher L; Danilova E
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):573-85. PubMed ID: 21767041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Set size and long-term memory/lexical effects in immediate serial recall: Testing the impurity principle.
    Neath I; Surprenant AM
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Apr; 47(3):455-472. PubMed ID: 30535585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional refreshing moderates the word frequency effect in immediate and delayed recall tasks.
    Abadie M; Camos V
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2018 Jul; 1424(1):127-136. PubMed ID: 29756215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of divided attention and of stimulus repetition on item-item binding in verbal working memory.
    Peterson DJ; Decker R; Naveh-Benjamin M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Nov; 45(11):1955-1969. PubMed ID: 30869953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Forgetting from working memory: does novelty encoding matter?
    Plancher G; Barrouillet P
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):110-25. PubMed ID: 22563635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Storage and processing in working memory: Assessing dual-task performance and task prioritization across the adult lifespan.
    Rhodes S; Jaroslawska AJ; Doherty JM; Belletier C; Naveh-Benjamin M; Cowan N; Camos V; Barrouillet P; Logie RH
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Jul; 148(7):1204-1227. PubMed ID: 30667263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpolated retrieval effects on list isolation: Individual differences in working memory capacity.
    Wahlheim CN; Alexander TR; Kane MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):619-642. PubMed ID: 30725377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Where working memory meets long-term memory: The interplay of list length and distractors on memory performance.
    Loaiza VM; Halse SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1455-1472. PubMed ID: 30070565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attending to items in working memory: evidence that refreshing and memory search are closely related.
    Vergauwe E; Cowan N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):1001-6. PubMed ID: 25361821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Levels of processing in working memory: differential involvement of frontotemporal networks.
    Rose NS; Craik FI; Buchsbaum BR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 27(3):522-32. PubMed ID: 25313657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hebb repetition effects in complex and simple span tasks are based on the same learning mechanism.
    Araya C; Oberauer K; Saito S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 May; 50(5):759-774. PubMed ID: 37883053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Hebb repetition effect in simple and complex memory span.
    Oberauer K; Jones T; Lewandowsky S
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):852-65. PubMed ID: 25712915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term associative learning predicts verbal short-term memory performance.
    Jones G; Macken B
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Feb; 46(2):216-229. PubMed ID: 28971367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. False memory at short and long term.
    Abadie M; Camos V
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Aug; 148(8):1312-1334. PubMed ID: 30550338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Phonological similarity in working memory span tasks.
    Chow M; Macnamara BN; Conway AR
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Aug; 44(6):937-49. PubMed ID: 27048510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attention's Accelerator.
    Reinhart RM; McClenahan LJ; Woodman GF
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Jun; 27(6):790-8. PubMed ID: 27056975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The fate of distractors in working memory: No evidence for their active removal.
    Dagry I; Barrouillet P
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():129-138. PubMed ID: 28886408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.