239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30556724)
1. I see what you meant to say: Anticipating speech errors during online sentence processing.
Lowder MW; Ferreira F
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1849-1858. PubMed ID: 30556724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Autistic adults anticipate and integrate meaning based on the speaker's voice: Evidence from eye-tracking and event-related potentials.
Barzy M; Black J; Williams D; Ferguson HJ
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2020 Jun; 149(6):1097-1115. PubMed ID: 31714095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of Disfluency in Online Interpretation of Deception.
Loy JE; Rohde H; Corley M
Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 6():1434-1456. PubMed ID: 27246116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Flexible predictions during listening comprehension: Speaker reliability affects anticipatory processes.
Brothers T; Dave S; Hoversten LJ; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
Neuropsychologia; 2019 Dec; 135():107225. PubMed ID: 31605686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony.
Regel S; Coulson S; Gunter TC
Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1311():121-35. PubMed ID: 19900421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.
Bonhage CE; Mueller JL; Friederici AD; Fiebach CJ
Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():33-47. PubMed ID: 26003489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does dynamic information about the speaker's face contribute to semantic speech processing? ERP evidence.
Hernández-Gutiérrez D; Abdel Rahman R; Martín-Loeches M; Muñoz F; Schacht A; Sommer W
Cortex; 2018 Jul; 104():12-25. PubMed ID: 29715582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Online pragmatic interpretations of scalar adjectives are affected by perceived speaker reliability.
Gardner B; Dix S; Lawrence R; Morgan C; Sullivan A; Kurumada C
PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0245130. PubMed ID: 33606683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. I see what you're saying: the integration of complex speech and scenes during language comprehension.
Andersson R; Ferreira F; Henderson JM
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jun; 137(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 21303711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. I Forget What That's Called! Children's Online Processing of Disfluencies Depends on Speaker Knowledge.
Orena AJ; White KS
Child Dev; 2015; 86(6):1701-9. PubMed ID: 26344559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. What do you know? ERP evidence for immediate use of common ground during online reference resolution.
Sikos L; Tomlinson SB; Heins C; Grodner DJ
Cognition; 2019 Jan; 182():275-285. PubMed ID: 30388433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Social eye gaze modulates processing of speech and co-speech gesture.
Holler J; Schubotz L; Kelly S; Hagoort P; Schuetze M; Özyürek A
Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):692-7. PubMed ID: 25255036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction in the Processing of Repair Disfluencies.
Lowder MW; Ferreira F
Lang Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 31(1):73-79. PubMed ID: 26878026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anticipating who will say what: the influence of speaker-specific memory associations on reference resolution.
Horton WS; Slaten DG
Mem Cognit; 2012 Jan; 40(1):113-26. PubMed ID: 21818693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Toddlers use speech disfluencies to predict speakers' referential intentions.
Kidd C; White KS; Aslin RN
Dev Sci; 2011 Jul; 14(4):925-34. PubMed ID: 21676111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of speakers' gaze on situated language comprehension: Evidence from Event-Related Potentials.
Jachmann TK; Drenhaus H; Staudte M; Crocker MW
Brain Cogn; 2019 Oct; 135():103571. PubMed ID: 31202157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cognitive control mediates age-related changes in flexible anticipatory processing during listening comprehension.
Dave S; Brothers T; Hoversten LJ; Traxler MJ; Swaab TY
Brain Res; 2021 Oct; 1768():147573. PubMed ID: 34216583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of speaker gaze on listener comprehension: contrasting visual versus intentional accounts.
Staudte M; Crocker MW; Heloir A; Kipp M
Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):317-28. PubMed ID: 25079951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Between alpha and gamma oscillations: Neural signatures of linguistic predictions and listener's attention to speaker's communication intention.
Stinkeste C; Vincent MA; Delrue L; Brunellière A
Biol Psychol; 2023 May; 180():108583. PubMed ID: 37156325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Balancing Prediction and Sensory Input in Speech Comprehension: The Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Word Recognition in Context.
Klimovich-Gray A; Tyler LK; Randall B; Kocagoncu E; Devereux B; Marslen-Wilson WD
J Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 39(3):519-527. PubMed ID: 30459221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
