These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30556748)

  • 1. Adhesive precoated bracket systems and operator coated bracket systems: Is there any difference?
    Alakttash AM; Fawzi M; Bearn D
    Angle Orthod; 2019 May; 89(3):495-504. PubMed ID: 30556748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bonding characteristics of a self-etching primer and precoated brackets: an in vitro study.
    Hirani S; Sherriff M
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug; 28(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 16495372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of clinical bond failure rates and bonding times between two adhesive precoated bracket systems.
    Tümoğlu M; Akkurt A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Apr; 155(4):523-528. PubMed ID: 30935607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of modifying the adhesive composition on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets.
    Bishara SE; Ajlouni R; Laffoon J; Warren J
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):464-7. PubMed ID: 12401056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flash-free and conventional adhesive ceramic brackets in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Daraqel B; Yingying T; Zheng L
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Feb; 26(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 35506474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of flash-free and conventional bonding systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang H; Feng G; Hu B; Tian H; Kuang Y; Zhang T; Song J
    Angle Orthod; 2022 Jul; 92(5):691-9. PubMed ID: 35834818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical bond failure of pre-coated and operator-coated orthodontic brackets.
    Kula K; Schreiner R; Brown J; Glaros A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2002 Aug; 5(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 12194665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical performance of orthodontic brackets and adhesive systems: a randomized clinical trial.
    Sunna S; Rock WP
    Br J Orthod; 1998 Nov; 25(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 9884779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical performance of precoated brackets and self-etch bonding technique: a prospective comparative study.
    Atik E; Gorucu-Coskuner H; Taner T
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Jun; 23(6):2813-2821. PubMed ID: 30506226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of 1-stage orthodontic bonding systems and 2-stage bonding systems: a review of the literature and the results of a randomized clinical trial].
    Shah J; Chadwick S
    Orthod Fr; 2009 Jun; 80(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 19552876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decalcification and bond failure rate in resin modified glass ionomer cement versus conventional composite for orthodontic bonding: A systematic review & meta-analysis.
    Khan AR; Fida M; Gul M
    Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 31882396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical comparison of an adhesive precoated vs. an uncoated ceramic bracket system.
    Verstrynge A; Ghesquiere A; Willems G
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2004 Feb; 7(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 14989750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Curing lights for orthodontic bonding: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Fleming PS; Eliades T; Katsaros C; Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4 Suppl):S92-103. PubMed ID: 23540642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical bracket failure rates between different bonding techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Dudás C; Czumbel LM; Kiss S; Gede N; Hegyi P; Mártha K; Varga G
    Eur J Orthod; 2023 Mar; 45(2):175-185. PubMed ID: 36222731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the effects of 2 different adhesive-coated bracket systems on white spot lesion formation.
    Yelken İA; Oz AZ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Dec; 164(6):862-867. PubMed ID: 37656071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of self-etch primers with conventional acid-etch technique for bonding brackets in orthodontics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kerayechian N; Bardideh E; Bayani S
    Eur J Orthod; 2022 Aug; 44(4):385-395. PubMed ID: 35022707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enamel around orthodontic brackets coated with flash-free and conventional adhesives.
    ElSherifa MT; Shamaa MS; Montasser MA
    J Orofac Orthop; 2020 Nov; 81(6):419-426. PubMed ID: 32696069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do we need primer for orthodontic bonding? A randomized controlled trial.
    Nandhra SS; Littlewood SJ; Houghton N; Luther F; Prabhu J; Munyombwe T; Wood SR
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):147-55. PubMed ID: 25234405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparisons of shear bond strength of precoated and uncoated brackets.
    Bishara SE; Olsen M; Von Wald L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Dec; 112(6):617-21. PubMed ID: 9423693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of reducing excess dental adhesive on bacterial adhesion in the bracket periphery.
    Hennig CL; Blochberger B; Symmank J; Nitzsche Á; Nietzsche S; Steiniger F; Dederichs M; Güllmar A; Reise M; Schulze-Späte U; Sigusch B; Jacobs C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 May; 27(5):1993-2001. PubMed ID: 36809356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.