These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30557240)

  • 21. The C-Word: Scientific Euphemisms Do Not Improve Causal Inference From Observational Data.
    Hernán MA
    Am J Public Health; 2018 May; 108(5):616-619. PubMed ID: 29565659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of observational research reports published in Turkish nursing journals.
    Karaçam Z; Şen E; Yildirim B
    Int Nurs Rev; 2015 Sep; 62(3):394-403. PubMed ID: 25801366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Application of mendelian randomization methods in causal inference of observational study].
    Lin LJ; Wei YY; Zhang RY; Chen F
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 53(6):619-624. PubMed ID: 31177761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Living with observational data in biological anthropology.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2019 Aug; 169(4):591-598. PubMed ID: 31132157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cautionary tales in the interpretation of observational studies of effects of clinical interventions.
    Scott IA; Attia J
    Intern Med J; 2017 Feb; 47(2):144-157. PubMed ID: 27345967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reporting of Limitations of Observational Research.
    Wang MT; Bolland MJ; Grey A
    JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Sep; 175(9):1571-2. PubMed ID: 26053740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Continuing use of the terms prospective and retrospective and quality of reporting of observational studies: time to update the STROBE guideline?
    Caram-Deelder C; Kreuger AL; Rosendaal FR; van der Bom JG; Middelburg RA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2016 Apr; 45(2):587-9. PubMed ID: 26721602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Critical reading of analytical observational studies].
    García Villar C; Marín León I
    Radiologia; 2015 Nov; 57 Suppl 2():1-9. PubMed ID: 26123855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Do pooled estimates from meta-analyses of observational epidemiology studies contribute to causal inference?
    Savitz DA; Forastiere F
    Occup Environ Med; 2021 Sep; 78(9):621-622. PubMed ID: 34158356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Taboo Against Explicit Causal Inference in Nonexperimental Psychology.
    Grosz MP; Rohrer JM; Thoemmes F
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 Sep; 15(5):1243-1255. PubMed ID: 32727292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Unique Space of Epidemiology: Drawing on the Past to Project Into the Future.
    Diez Roux AV
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 May; 188(5):886-889. PubMed ID: 30877287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improving Reporting Quality in Ophthalmologic Observational Studies That Use Big Data: The Case of Retinal Detachment Associated With Fluoroquinolone Use.
    Etminan M; Maberley DAL
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 136(6):611-612. PubMed ID: 29710207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Guidelines for multiple imputations in repeated measurements with time-dependent covariates: a case study.
    Tan FES; Jolani S; Verbeek H
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Oct; 102():107-114. PubMed ID: 29964148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Top ten errors of statistical analysis in observational studies for cancer research.
    Carmona-Bayonas A; Jimenez-Fonseca P; Fernández-Somoano A; Álvarez-Manceñido F; Castañón E; Custodio A; de la Peña FA; Payo RM; Valiente LP
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 Aug; 20(8):954-965. PubMed ID: 29218627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Primary versus secondary source of data in observational studies and heterogeneity in meta-analyses of drug effects: a survey of major medical journals.
    Prada-Ramallal G; Roque F; Herdeiro MT; Takkouche B; Figueiras A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):97. PubMed ID: 30261846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Causal inference from observational data and target trial emulation.
    Jafarzadeh SR; Neogi T
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2022 Nov; 30(11):1415-1417. PubMed ID: 36063988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How should we achieve high-quality reporting of statistics in scientific journals? A commentary on "Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society".
    Clayton MK
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2007 Dec; 31(4):302-4; discussion 306-7. PubMed ID: 18057397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Target Trial Emulation: A Framework for Causal Inference From Observational Data.
    Hernán MA; Wang W; Leaf DE
    JAMA; 2022 Dec; 328(24):2446-2447. PubMed ID: 36508210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Causal interpretation of correlational studies - Analysis of medical news on the website of the official journal for German physicians.
    Buhse S; Rahn AC; Bock M; Mühlhauser I
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196833. PubMed ID: 29723258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reporting Quality of Observational Studies in Plastic Surgery Needs Improvement: A Systematic Review.
    Agha RA; Lee SY; Jeong KJ; Fowler AJ; Orgill DP
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):585-9. PubMed ID: 25643190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.