These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30557923)

  • 1. State regulatory efforts in protecting a surrogate's bodily autonomy.
    Williams A
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2019; 49(1):205-31. PubMed ID: 30557923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A civil liberties analysis of surrogacy arrangements.
    Gostin L
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2001; 17(2):432-54. PubMed ID: 11475567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surrogacy from the perspectives of economic and civil liberties.
    Gostin LO
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2001; 17(2):429-31. PubMed ID: 11475566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Freedom at home: state constitutions and Medicaid funding for abortions.
    Vanzi LM
    N M Law Rev; 1996; 26(3):433-54. PubMed ID: 16100794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the viability of a substantive due process right to in vitro fertilization.
    Harv Law Rev; 2005 Jun; 118(8):2792-813. PubMed ID: 15988862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contracts concerning abortion.
    Bohn MA
    J Fam Law; 1992-1993; 31(2):515-34. PubMed ID: 11659691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. One baby too many.
    Taylor C
    Time; 2001 Aug; 158(8):55. PubMed ID: 11534480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Privacy and the regulation of the new reproductive technologies: a decision-making approach.
    Sedillo Lopez A
    Fam Law Q; 1988; 22(2):173-97. PubMed ID: 16100818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A plea for the enforceability of gestational surrogacy contracts.
    Lascarides DE
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1997; 25(4):1221-59. PubMed ID: 16086520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Do fetal rights limit mothers' rights?
    State Legis; 2002 Jun; 28(6):6. PubMed ID: 12051253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors.
    O'Shaughnessy M
    Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physically Intrusive Abortion Restrictions as Fourth Amendment Searches and Seizures: A new conceptual avenue for challenging abortion restrictions.
    Harv Law Rev; 2015 Jan; 128(3):951-72. PubMed ID: 26793815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Informed consent and the First Amendment.
    Mariner WK; Annas GJ
    N Engl J Med; 2015 Apr; 372(14):1285-7. PubMed ID: 25830420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A woman decides: Justice O'Connor and due process rights of choice.
    Davis PC; Gilligan C
    McGeorge Law Rev; 2001; 32(3):895-914. PubMed ID: 16493803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Constitutional analysis of the Baby M decision.
    Stark B
    Harv Womens Law J; 1988; 11():19-52. PubMed ID: 16100827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minor rights: the adolescent abortion cases.
    Guggenheim M
    Hofstra Law Rev; 2002; 30(3):589-646. PubMed ID: 15212070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bioethics discovers the Bill of Rights.
    Veatch RM
    Natl Forum; 1989; 69(4):11-3. PubMed ID: 16100834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Informed consent laws and the constitution: balancing state interests with a physician's first amendment rights and a woman's due process rights.
    Runels S
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2009; 26(1):185-211. PubMed ID: 20112623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions.
    Weissmann R
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1999; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.