These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3055794)

  • 1. Impressions for prosthodontic restorations reproducing narrow spaces and severe undercuts.
    Hansson O; Eklund J
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1988 Aug; 46(4):199-206. PubMed ID: 3055794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A historical review of hydrocolloids and an investigation of the dimensional accuracy of the new alginates for crown and bridge impressions when using stock trays.
    Hansson O; Eklund J
    Swed Dent J; 1984; 8(2):81-95. PubMed ID: 6377548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions.
    Wee AG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 10709042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rigidity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Jamani KD; Harrington E; Wilson HJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1989 May; 16(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 2746411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of one- and two-step techniques with the use of putty/wash addition silicone impression materials.
    Idris B; Houston F; Claffey N
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):535-41. PubMed ID: 8809262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dimensional stability and detail reproduction of irreversible hydrocolloid and elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.
    Johnson GH; Chellis KD; Gordon GE; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Apr; 79(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 9576321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlation between the degree of deformation of the stone die and the amount of the master die undercut. Part 1. Single tooth die.
    Murakami H; Takehana S; Abe T; Yamamoto Y; Takenaka M
    Aichi Gakuin Dent Sci; 1989; 2():57-65. PubMed ID: 2701499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Linear contraction and accuracy of impressions of an imprinted alginate material in comparison with a silicone material for consistent finishing].
    Kowalczyk A; Dobies K
    Protet Stomatol; 1985; 35(4):187-92. PubMed ID: 3916244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Various mechanical properties of elastic impression materials].
    Roselino RB; Bignelli P; Fernandes Chaves PH
    Rev Fac Farm Odontol Ribeiro Preto; 1982; 19(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 6964944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alginate Materials and Dental Impression Technique: A Current State of the Art and Application to Dental Practice.
    Cervino G; Fiorillo L; Herford AS; Laino L; Troiano G; Amoroso G; Crimi S; Matarese M; D'Amico C; Nastro Siniscalchi E; Cicciù M
    Mar Drugs; 2018 Dec; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 30597945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictable elastomeric impressions in advanced fixed prosthodontics: a comprehensive review.
    Lee EA
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1999 May; 11(4):497-504; quiz 506. PubMed ID: 10635238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The determination of elastic recovery of impression materials at the setting time.
    Jamani KD; Harrington E; Wilson HJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1989 Jan; 16(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 2746408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique.
    Hung SH; Purk JH; Tira DE; Eick JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 May; 67(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 1527737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of stone-casts produced from selected addition-type silicone impressions.
    Finger W; Ohsawa M
    Scand J Dent Res; 1983 Feb; 91(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 6573762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of impression materials measured with a vertical height gauge.
    Lewinstein I; Craig RG
    J Oral Rehabil; 1990 Jul; 17(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 2213324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictable elastomeric impressions in advanced fixed prosthodontics: a comprehensive review.
    Lee EA
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 19(9):529-36; quiz 537, 565. PubMed ID: 18038717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of marginal thickness on the distortion of different impression materials.
    Laufer BZ; Baharav H; Ganor Y; Cardash HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Nov; 76(5):466-71. PubMed ID: 8933434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.