132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30558491)
1. Spatial Release From Informational Masking: Evidence From Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy.
Zhang M; Mary Ying YL; Ihlefeld A
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518817464. PubMed ID: 30558491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interaural level differences do not suffice for restoring spatial release from masking in simulated cochlear implant listening.
Ihlefeld A; Litovsky RY
PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45296. PubMed ID: 23028914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Signal envelope and speech intelligibility differentially impact auditory motion perception.
Warnecke M; Litovsky RY
Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):15117. PubMed ID: 34302032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of spatial configuration and fundamental frequency on speech intelligibility in multiple-talker conditions in the ipsilateral horizontal plane and median planea).
Yao D; Zhao J; Wang L; Shang Z; Gu J; Wang Y; Jia M; Li J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2024 May; 155(5):2934-2947. PubMed ID: 38717201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validating a Rapid, Automated Test of Spatial Release From Masking.
Jakien KM; Kampel SD; Stansell MM; Gallun FJ
Am J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 26(4):507-518. PubMed ID: 28973106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Acquired Aphasia on the Recognition of Speech Under Energetic and Informational Masking Conditions.
Villard S; Kidd G
Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519884480. PubMed ID: 31694486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strength of target source segregation cues affects the outcome of speech-on-speech masking experiments.
Roverud E; Villard S; Kidd G
J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 May; 153(5):2780. PubMed ID: 37140176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of presentation level on speech-on-speech masking by voice-gender difference and spatial separation between talkers.
Oh Y; Friggle P; Kinder J; Tilbrook G; Bridges SE
Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1282764. PubMed ID: 38192513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Benefits of Increased Sensation Level and Bandwidth for Spatial Release From Masking.
Jakien KM; Kampel SD; Gordon SY; Gallun FJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(1):e13-e21. PubMed ID: 27556520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Effect of Sound Localization on Auditory-Only and Audiovisual Speech Recognition in a Simulated Multitalker Environment.
Sheffield SW; Wheeler HJ; Brungart DS; Bernstein JGW
Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231186040. PubMed ID: 37415497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Weighting of spatial and spectro-temporal cues for auditory scene analysis by human listeners.
Bremen P; Middlebrooks JC
PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e59815. PubMed ID: 23527271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cortical networks for recognition of speech with simultaneous talkers.
Herrera C; Whittle N; Leek MR; Brodbeck C; Lee G; Barcenas C; Barnes S; Holshouser B; Yi A; Venezia JH
Hear Res; 2023 Sep; 437():108856. PubMed ID: 37531847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Informational masking of speech in children: auditory-visual integration.
Wightman F; Kistler D; Brungart D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Jun; 119(6):3940-9. PubMed ID: 16838537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating cortical responses to speech in children: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study.
Lawrence RJ; Wiggins IM; Hodgson JC; Hartley DEH
Hear Res; 2021 Mar; 401():108155. PubMed ID: 33360183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The information-divergence hypothesis of informational masking.
Lutfi RA; Gilbertson L; Heo I; Chang AC; Stamas J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2160-70. PubMed ID: 23967946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of auditory spatial training on informational masking release in elderly listeners: a study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.
Jarollahi F; Amiri M; Jalaie S; Sameni SJ
F1000Res; 2019; 8():420. PubMed ID: 31354946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Tinnitus impairs segregation of competing speech in normal-hearing listeners.
Liu YW; Wang B; Chen B; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19851. PubMed ID: 33199782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of degraded speech processing and binaural unmasking investigated using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).
Zhou X; Sobczak GS; McKay CM; Litovsky RY
PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0267588. PubMed ID: 35468160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Informational masking influences segmental and suprasegmental speech categorization.
Symons AE; Holt LL; Tierney AT
Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Apr; 31(2):686-696. PubMed ID: 37658222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hemodynamic Responses Link Individual Differences in Informational Masking to the Vicinity of Superior Temporal Gyrus.
Zhang M; Alamatsaz N; Ihlefeld A
Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():675326. PubMed ID: 34366772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
