These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30559477)

  • 1. Efficient coding of subjective value.
    Polanía R; Woodford M; Ruff CC
    Nat Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 22(1):134-142. PubMed ID: 30559477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Normalized value coding explains dynamic adaptation in the human valuation process.
    Khaw MW; Glimcher PW; Louie K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Nov; 114(48):12696-12701. PubMed ID: 29133418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choosing what we like vs liking what we choose: How choice-induced preference change might actually be instrumental to decision-making.
    Lee D; Daunizeau J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0231081. PubMed ID: 32421699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confidence in risky value-based choice.
    da Silva Castanheira K; Fleming SM; Otto AR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Jun; 28(3):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 33403535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deciding when to decide: time-variant sequential sampling models explain the emergence of value-based decisions in the human brain.
    Gluth S; Rieskamp J; Büchel C
    J Neurosci; 2012 Aug; 32(31):10686-98. PubMed ID: 22855817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trading mental effort for confidence in the metacognitive control of value-based decision-making.
    Lee DG; Daunizeau J
    Elife; 2021 Apr; 10():. PubMed ID: 33900198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adaptive History Biases Result from Confidence-Weighted Accumulation of past Choices.
    Braun A; Urai AE; Donner TH
    J Neurosci; 2018 Mar; 38(10):2418-2429. PubMed ID: 29371318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Subjective optimality in finite sequential decision-making.
    Sin Y; Seon H; Shin YK; Kwon OS; Chung D
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Dec; 17(12):e1009633. PubMed ID: 34914689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prefrontal mechanisms in preference and non-preference-based judgments.
    Foo JC; Haji T; Sakai K
    Neuroimage; 2014 Jul; 95():151-61. PubMed ID: 24662580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Attraction Effect Modulates Reward Prediction Errors and Intertemporal Choices.
    Gluth S; Hotaling JM; Rieskamp J
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 37(2):371-382. PubMed ID: 28077716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rapid decisions from experience.
    Zeigenfuse MD; Pleskac TJ; Liu T
    Cognition; 2014 May; 131(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 24549141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrieval-constrained valuation: Toward prediction of open-ended decisions.
    Zhang Z; Wang S; Good M; Hristova S; Kayser AS; Hsu M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 May; 118(20):. PubMed ID: 33990466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How we choose one over another: predicting trial-by-trial preference decision.
    Bhushan V; Saha G; Lindsen J; Shimojo S; Bhattacharya J
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e43351. PubMed ID: 22912859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hard Decisions Shape the Neural Coding of Preferences.
    Voigt K; Murawski C; Speer S; Bode S
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 39(4):718-726. PubMed ID: 30530856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. BOLD subjective value signals exhibit robust range adaptation.
    Cox KM; Kable JW
    J Neurosci; 2014 Dec; 34(49):16533-43. PubMed ID: 25471589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response time models separate single- and dual-process accounts of memory-based decisions.
    Kraemer PM; Fontanesi L; Spektor MS; Gluth S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Feb; 28(1):304-323. PubMed ID: 32989719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Foraging in a non-foraging task: Fitness maximization explains human risk preference dynamics under changing environment.
    Mochizuki Y; Harasawa N; Aggarwal M; Chen C; Fukuda H
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2024 May; 20(5):e1012080. PubMed ID: 38739672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of branding on preference-based decision making.
    Philiastides MG; Ratcliff R
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Jul; 24(7):1208-15. PubMed ID: 23696199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accounting for Taste: A Multi-Attribute Neurocomputational Model Explains the Neural Dynamics of Choices for Self and Others.
    Harris A; Clithero JA; Hutcherson CA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Sep; 38(37):7952-7968. PubMed ID: 30076214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An uncertainty-based model of the effects of fixation on choice.
    Li ZW; Ma WJ
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Aug; 17(8):e1009190. PubMed ID: 34398884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.