These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30560264)

  • 1. Acoustophoretic focusing effects on particle synthesis and clogging in microreactors.
    Dong Z; Fernandez Rivas D; Kuhn S
    Lab Chip; 2019 Jan; 19(2):316-327. PubMed ID: 30560264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Synergistic effects of the alternating application of low and high frequency ultrasound for particle synthesis in microreactors.
    Dong Z; Udepurkar AP; Kuhn S
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2020 Jan; 60():104800. PubMed ID: 31563796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Particle-size-dependent acoustophoretic motion and depletion of micro- and nano-particles at long timescales.
    Qiu W; Bruus H; Augustsson P
    Phys Rev E; 2020 Jul; 102(1-1):013108. PubMed ID: 32794927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Numerical study of acoustophoretic motion of particles in a PDMS microchannel driven by surface acoustic waves.
    Nama N; Barnkob R; Mao Z; Kähler CJ; Costanzo F; Huang TJ
    Lab Chip; 2015 Jun; 15(12):2700-9. PubMed ID: 26001199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reduced acoustic resonator dimensions improve focusing efficiency of bacteria and submicron particles.
    Ugawa M; Lee H; Baasch T; Lee M; Kim S; Jeong O; Choi YH; Sohn D; Laurell T; Ota S; Lee S
    Analyst; 2022 Jan; 147(2):274-281. PubMed ID: 34889326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of microchannel height on the acoustophoretic motion of sub-micron particles.
    Lai TW; Tennakoon T; Chan KC; Liu CH; Chao CYH; Fu SC
    Ultrasonics; 2024 Jan; 136():107126. PubMed ID: 37553269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pulsed ultrasound for temperature control and clogging prevention in micro-reactors.
    Delacour C; Lutz C; Kuhn S
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2019 Jul; 55():67-74. PubMed ID: 31084792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Particle Accumulation in a Microchannel and Its Reduction by a Standing Surface Acoustic Wave (SSAW).
    Sriphutkiat Y; Zhou Y
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Jan; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 28067852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Numerical and experimental analysis of a hybrid material acoustophoretic device for manipulation of microparticles.
    Barani A; Mosaddegh P; Haghjooy Javanmard S; Sepehrirahnama S; Sanati-Nezhad A
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22048. PubMed ID: 34764352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface Acoustic Wave-Based Microfluidic Device for Microparticles Manipulation: Effects of Microchannel Elasticity on the Device Performance.
    Mezzanzanica G; Français O; Mariani S
    Micromachines (Basel); 2023 Sep; 14(9):. PubMed ID: 37763962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influences of microparticle radius and microchannel height on SSAW-based acoustophoretic aggregation.
    Dong J; Liang D; Yang X; Sun C
    Ultrasonics; 2021 Dec; 117():106547. PubMed ID: 34419898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A numerical study of microparticle acoustophoresis driven by acoustic radiation forces and streaming-induced drag forces.
    Muller PB; Barnkob R; Jensen MJ; Bruus H
    Lab Chip; 2012 Nov; 12(22):4617-27. PubMed ID: 23010952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved understanding of the acoustophoretic focusing of dense suspensions in a microchannel.
    Karthick S; Sen AK
    Phys Rev E; 2017 Nov; 96(5-1):052606. PubMed ID: 29347756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasound-induced acoustophoretic motion of microparticles in three dimensions.
    Muller PB; Rossi M; Marín AG; Barnkob R; Augustsson P; Laurell T; Kähler CJ; Bruus H
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2013 Aug; 88(2):023006. PubMed ID: 24032923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic radiation force and torque exerted on a small viscoelastic particle in an ideal fluid.
    Leão-Neto JP; Silva GT
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Sep; 71():1-11. PubMed ID: 27254398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Separation of 300 and 100 nm Particles in Fabry-Perot Acoustofluidic Resonators.
    Sehgal P; Kirby BJ
    Anal Chem; 2017 Nov; 89(22):12192-12200. PubMed ID: 29039191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Teflon-coated silicon microreactors: impact on segmented liquid-liquid multiphase flows.
    Kuhn S; Hartman RL; Sultana M; Nagy KD; Marre S; Jensen KF
    Langmuir; 2011 May; 27(10):6519-27. PubMed ID: 21510687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Numerical study of the effect of channel aspect ratio on particle focusing in acoustophoretic devices.
    Spigarelli L; Vasile NS; Pirri CF; Canavese G
    Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19447. PubMed ID: 33173108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing WBC background in cancer cell separation products by negative acoustic contrast particle immuno-acoustophoresis.
    Cushing K; Undvall E; Ceder Y; Lilja H; Laurell T
    Anal Chim Acta; 2018 Feb; 1000():256-264. PubMed ID: 29289318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustophoresis in shallow microchannels.
    Koklu M; Sabuncu AC; Beskok A
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2010 Nov; 351(2):407-14. PubMed ID: 20804984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.