179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30560673)
1. Averaging Strategy To Reduce Variability in Target-Decoy Estimates of False Discovery Rate.
Keich U; Tamura K; Noble WS
J Proteome Res; 2019 Feb; 18(2):585-593. PubMed ID: 30560673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved False Discovery Rate Estimation Procedure for Shotgun Proteomics.
Keich U; Kertesz-Farkas A; Noble WS
J Proteome Res; 2015 Aug; 14(8):3148-61. PubMed ID: 26152888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Target-decoy false discovery rate estimation using Crema.
Lin A; See D; Fondrie WE; Keich U; Noble WS
Proteomics; 2024 Apr; 24(8):e2300084. PubMed ID: 38380501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Scalable Approach for Protein False Discovery Rate Estimation in Large Proteomic Data Sets.
Savitski MM; Wilhelm M; Hahne H; Kuster B; Bantscheff M
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2015 Sep; 14(9):2394-404. PubMed ID: 25987413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Unbiased False Discovery Rate Estimation for Shotgun Proteomics Based on the Target-Decoy Approach.
Levitsky LI; Ivanov MV; Lobas AA; Gorshkov MV
J Proteome Res; 2017 Feb; 16(2):393-397. PubMed ID: 27959540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial decoy spectral libraries for false discovery rate estimation in spectral library searching in proteomics.
Lam H; Deutsch EW; Aebersold R
J Proteome Res; 2010 Jan; 9(1):605-10. PubMed ID: 19916561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Two-dimensional target decoy strategy for shotgun proteomics.
Bern MW; Kil YJ
J Proteome Res; 2011 Dec; 10(12):5296-301. PubMed ID: 22010998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Common Decoy Distributions Simplify False Discovery Rate Estimation in Shotgun Proteomics.
Madej D; Wu L; Lam H
J Proteome Res; 2022 Feb; 21(2):339-348. PubMed ID: 34989576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Decoy methods for assessing false positives and false discovery rates in shotgun proteomics.
Wang G; Wu WW; Zhang Z; Masilamani S; Shen RF
Anal Chem; 2009 Jan; 81(1):146-59. PubMed ID: 19061407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving Peptide-Level Mass Spectrometry Analysis via Double Competition.
Lin A; Short T; Noble WS; Keich U
J Proteome Res; 2022 Oct; 21(10):2412-2420. PubMed ID: 36166314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An easy-to-use Decoy Database Builder software tool, implementing different decoy strategies for false discovery rate calculation in automated MS/MS protein identifications.
Reidegeld KA; Eisenacher M; Kohl M; Chamrad D; Körting G; Blüggel M; Meyer HE; Stephan C
Proteomics; 2008 Mar; 8(6):1129-37. PubMed ID: 18338823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. False Discovery Rate Estimation for Hybrid Mass Spectral Library Search Identifications in Bottom-up Proteomics.
Burke MC; Zhang Z; Mirokhin YA; Tchekovskoi DV; Liang Y; Stein SE
J Proteome Res; 2019 Sep; 18(9):3223-3234. PubMed ID: 31364354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. BuildSummary: using a group-based approach to improve the sensitivity of peptide/protein identification in shotgun proteomics.
Sheng Q; Dai J; Wu Y; Tang H; Zeng R
J Proteome Res; 2012 Mar; 11(3):1494-502. PubMed ID: 22217156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Progressive calibration and averaging for tandem mass spectrometry statistical confidence estimation: Why settle for a single decoy?
Keich U; Noble WS
Res Comput Mol Biol; 2017 May; 10229():99-116. PubMed ID: 29326989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving sensitivity in proteome studies by analysis of false discovery rates for multiple search engines.
Jones AR; Siepen JA; Hubbard SJ; Paton NW
Proteomics; 2009 Mar; 9(5):1220-9. PubMed ID: 19253293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Beyond Target-Decoy Competition: Stable Validation of Peptide and Protein Identifications in Mass Spectrometry-Based Discovery Proteomics.
Couté Y; Bruley C; Burger T
Anal Chem; 2020 Nov; 92(22):14898-14906. PubMed ID: 32970414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. False Discovery Rate Estimation in Proteomics.
Aggarwal S; Yadav AK
Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1362():119-28. PubMed ID: 26519173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transferred subgroup false discovery rate for rare post-translational modifications detected by mass spectrometry.
Fu Y; Qian X
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2014 May; 13(5):1359-68. PubMed ID: 24200586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. False discovery rate estimation using candidate peptides for each spectrum.
Lee S; Park H; Kim H
BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):454. PubMed ID: 36319948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Using the entrapment sequence method as a standard to evaluate key steps of proteomics data analysis process.
Feng XD; Li LW; Zhang JH; Zhu YP; Chang C; Shu KX; Ma J
BMC Genomics; 2017 Mar; 18(Suppl 2):143. PubMed ID: 28361671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
