BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

42 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30561108)

  • 1. Can a channelized Hotelling observer assess image quality in acquired mammographic images of an anthropomorphic breast phantom including image processing?
    Balta C; Bouwman RW; Sechopoulos I; Broeders MJM; Karssemeijer N; van Engen RE; Veldkamp WJH
    Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):714-725. PubMed ID: 30561108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimization of the difference-of-Gaussian channel sets for the channelized Hotelling observer.
    Balta C; Bouwman RW; Broeders MJM; Karssemeijer N; Veldkamp WJH; Sechopoulos I; van Engen RE
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2019 Jul; 6(3):035501. PubMed ID: 31572746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation between model observer and human observer performance in CT imaging when lesion location is uncertain.
    Leng S; Yu L; Zhang Y; Carter R; Toledano AY; McCollough CH
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081908. PubMed ID: 23927322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adaptation of a channelized Hotelling observer model to accommodate anthropomorphic backgrounds and moving test objects in X-ray angiography.
    Gomez-Cardona D; Favazza CP; Leng S; Schueler BA; Fetterly KA
    Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):6737-6747. PubMed ID: 37712881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Channelized hotelling observer-based low-contrast detectability on the ACR CT accreditation phantom: Part II. Repeatability study.
    Fan M; Zhou Z; McCollough C; Yu L
    Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):1714-1725. PubMed ID: 38305692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computational reader design and statistical performance evaluation of an
    Zeng R; Samuelson FW; Sharma D; Badal A; Christian GG; Glick SJ; Myers KJ; Badano A
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2020 Jul; 7(4):042802. PubMed ID: 32118094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A statistical, task-based evaluation method for three-dimensional x-ray breast imaging systems using variable-background phantoms.
    Park S; Jennings R; Liu H; Badano A; Myers K
    Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6253-70. PubMed ID: 21302782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Numerical observer for atherosclerotic plaque classification in spectral computed tomography.
    Lorsakul A; Fakhri GE; Worstell W; Ouyang J; Rakvongthai Y; Laine AF; Li Q
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2016 Jul; 3(3):035501. PubMed ID: 27429999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dose reduction and its influence on diagnostic accuracy and radiation risk in digital mammography: an observer performance study using an anthropomorphic breast phantom.
    Svahn T; Hemdal B; Ruschin M; Chakraborty DP; Andersson I; Tingberg A; Mattsson S
    Br J Radiol; 2007 Jul; 80(955):557-62. PubMed ID: 17704316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the channelized Hotelling observer with an internal-noise model in a train-test paradigm for cardiac SPECT defect detection.
    Brankov JG
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(20):7159-82. PubMed ID: 24051342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human- and model-observer performance in ramp-spectrum noise: effects of regularization and object variability.
    Abbey CK; Barrett HH
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2001 Mar; 18(3):473-88. PubMed ID: 11265678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generalization Evaluation of Machine Learning Numerical Observers for Image Quality Assessment.
    Kalayeh MM; Marin T; Brankov JG
    IEEE Trans Nucl Sci; 2013 Jun; 60(3):1609-1618. PubMed ID: 25346545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Task-based assessment of digital mammography microcalcification detection with deep learning denoising algorithmss using
    Makeev A; Glick SJ
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2023 Sep; 10(5):053502. PubMed ID: 37808969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Convolutional neural network-based model observer for signal known statistically task in breast tomosynthesis images.
    Jang H; Baek J
    Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6390-6408. PubMed ID: 36971505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Convolutional Neural Networks for Search in 1/f
    Jonnalagadda A; Lago MA; Barufaldi B; Bakic PR; Abbey CK; Maidment AD; Eckstein MP
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2020 Feb; 11316():. PubMed ID: 32435081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Foveated Model Observers for Visual Search in 3D Medical Images.
    Lago MA; Abbey CK; Eckstein MP
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2021 Mar; 40(3):1021-1031. PubMed ID: 33315556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Approximating the Hotelling observer with autoencoder-learned efficient channels for binary signal detection tasks.
    Granstedt JL; Zhou W; Anastasio MA
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2023 Sep; 10(5):055501. PubMed ID: 37767114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accounting for anatomical noise in search-capable model observers for planar nuclear imaging.
    Sen A; Gifford HC
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2016 Jan; 3(1):015502. PubMed ID: 26835503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimization of energy window and evaluation of scatter compensation methods in myocardial perfusion SPECT using the ideal observer with and without model mismatch and an anthropomorphic model observer.
    Ghaly M; Links JM; Frey E
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2015 Jan; 2(1):. PubMed ID: 26029730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigation of optimal display size for viewing T1-weighted MR images of the brain using a digital contrast-detail phantom.
    Fujita H; Kuwahata N; Hattori H; Kinoshita H; Fukuda H
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):353-359. PubMed ID: 26894360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.