152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30562159)
21. Abortion surveillance--United States, 1999.
Elam-Evans LD; Strauss LT; Herndon J; Parker WY; Whitehead S; Berg CJ
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2002 Nov; 51(9):1-9, 11-28. PubMed ID: 12495293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Physicians' agreement with and willingness to provide abortion services in the case of pregnancy from rape in Mexico.
Silva M; Billings DL; García SG; Lara D
Contraception; 2009 Jan; 79(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 19041442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An exploratory study of what happens to women who are denied abortions in Cape Town, South Africa.
Harries J; Gerdts C; Momberg M; Greene Foster D
Reprod Health; 2015 Mar; 12():21. PubMed ID: 25884479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Con la ley y sin la ley/With and without the law: Utilization of abortion services and case fatality in Mexico, 2000-2016.
Darney BG; Fuentes-Rivera E; Polo G; Saavedra-Avendaño B; Alexander LT; Schiavon R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2020 Mar; 148(3):369-374. PubMed ID: 31821537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Barriers around access to abortion experienced by rural women in New South Wales, Australia.
Doran FM; Hornibrook J
Rural Remote Health; 2016; 16(1):3538. PubMed ID: 26987999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Who presents past the gestational age limit for first trimester abortion in the public sector in Mexico City?
Saavedra-Avendano B; Schiavon R; Sanhueza P; Rios-Polanco R; Garcia-Martinez L; Darney BG
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192547. PubMed ID: 29414987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. ["The system is still precarious". Barriers in access to medical abortion: the experience of accompanying persons in three regions of Mexico].
Veldhuis S; Sánchez-Ramírez G; Darney BG
Cad Saude Publica; 2022; 38(4):ES124221. PubMed ID: 35508026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Abortion in the United States, 1977-1978.
Forrest JD; Sullivan E; Tietze C
Fam Plann Perspect; 1979; 11(6):329-41. PubMed ID: 401078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Patient characteristics and service trends following abortion legalization in Mexico City, 2007-10.
Mondragón y Kalb M; Ahued Ortega A; Morales Velazquez J; Díaz Olavarrieta C; Valencia Rodríguez J; Becker D; García SG
Stud Fam Plann; 2011 Sep; 42(3):159-66. PubMed ID: 21972668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The use of contraception among abortion applicants.
Krishnamoni D; Jain SC
Can J Public Health; 1985; 76(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 4005776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Abortion among adolescents in Cuba.
Peláez Mendoz J; Rodriguez Izquiendo A; Lammers C; Blum RW
J Adolesc Health; 1999 Jan; 24(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 9890366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The impact of women's employment and education on contraceptive use and abortion in Kinshasa, Zaire.
Shapiro D; Tambashe BO
Stud Fam Plann; 1994; 25(2):96-110. PubMed ID: 8059449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Young Mexicans' hopes and fears about abortion and abortion law: a qualitative study in two cities.
Tatum CE; Garcia SG; Yam EA; Becker D
Gac Med Mex; 2006; 142 Suppl 2():95-102. PubMed ID: 19031685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Travelling for abortion services in Mexico 2016-2019: community-level contexts of Mexico City public abortion clients.
Jacobson LE; Saavedra-Avendano B; Fuentes-Rivera E; Schiavon R; Darney BG
BMJ Sex Reprod Health; 2022 Jan; 48(e1):e81-e87. PubMed ID: 34321256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reducing deaths from pregnancy and childbirth. Asia.
Pillai G
Links; 1993; 9(5):11-3. PubMed ID: 12159274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Abortion trend and practice in 6 states in northern Mexico].
Tomaro JB
Estud Poblac; 1979; 4(7-11):61-84. PubMed ID: 12310284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Fertility and induced abortion in poor Chilean women from the perspective of medical anthropology].
Weisner M
Enfoques Aten Prim; 1988 Sep; 3(3):23-32. PubMed ID: 12281977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Legal abortion in Asturias (Spain) after the 1985 law: sociodemographic characteristics of women applying for abortion.
Uria M; Mosquera C
Eur J Epidemiol; 1999 Jan; 15(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 10098997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Abortion incidence and services in the United States, 1995-1996.
Henshaw SK
Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(6):263-70, 287. PubMed ID: 9859016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Abortion-seeking women's views on the importance of social benefits as an alternative to induced abortion].
Ganes T; Sejersted O
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1976 May; 96(13):768-70. PubMed ID: 936152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
