132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30562165)
1. An active learning framework for enhancing identification of non-artifactual intracranial pressure waveforms.
Megjhani M; Alkhachroum A; Terilli K; Ford J; Rubinos C; Kromm J; Wallace BK; Connolly ES; Roh D; Agarwal S; Claassen J; Padmanabhan R; Hu X; Park S
Physiol Meas; 2019 Jan; 40(1):015002. PubMed ID: 30562165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Peak detection in intracranial pressure signal waveforms: a comparative study.
Wei M; Krakauskaite S; Subramanian S; Scalzo F
Biomed Eng Online; 2024 Jun; 23(1):61. PubMed ID: 38915091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of ventricular drainage on the intracranial pressure signal and the pressure reactivity index.
Howells T; Johnson U; McKelvey T; Ronne-Engström E; Enblad P
J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Apr; 31(2):469-478. PubMed ID: 26987656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An Integration of Decision Tree and Visual Analysis to Analyze Intracranial Pressure.
Ji SY; Najarian K; Huynh T; Jeong DH
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1598():405-419. PubMed ID: 28508375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patient-adaptable intracranial pressure morphology analysis using a probabilistic model-based approach.
Rashidinejad P; Hu X; Russell S
Physiol Meas; 2020 Nov; 41(10):104003. PubMed ID: 32992304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel machine learning-enabled framework for instantaneous heart rate monitoring from motion-artifact-corrupted electrocardiogram signals.
Zhang Q; Zhou D; Zeng X
Physiol Meas; 2016 Nov; 37(11):1945-1967. PubMed ID: 27681602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A subspace decomposition approach toward recognizing valid pulsatile signals.
Asgari S; Xu P; Bergsneider M; Hu X
Physiol Meas; 2009 Nov; 30(11):1211-25. PubMed ID: 19794232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic identification of intracranial pressure waveform during external ventricular drainage clamping: segmentation via wavelet analysis.
Megjhani M; Terilli K; Kwon SB; Nametz D; Weinerman B; Velazquez A; Ghoshal S; Roh D; Agarwal S; Connolly ES; Claassen J; Park S
Physiol Meas; 2023 Jul; 44(6):. PubMed ID: 37327793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Intracranial pressure signal morphology: real-time tracking.
Scalzo F; Bergsneider M; Vespa PM; Martin NA; Hu X
IEEE Pulse; 2012 Mar; 3(2):49-52. PubMed ID: 22481746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frequency interpretation of tidal peak in intracranial pressure wave.
Shahsavari S; McKelvey T
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():2689-92. PubMed ID: 19163259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interpretation of approximate entropy: analysis of intracranial pressure approximate entropy during acute intracranial hypertension.
Hornero R; Aboy M; Abásolo D; McNames J; Goldstein B
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Oct; 52(10):1671-80. PubMed ID: 16235653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. End-to-End Automatic Morphological Classification of Intracranial Pressure Pulse Waveforms Using Deep Learning.
Mataczynski C; Kazimierska A; Uryga A; Burzynska M; Rusiecki A; Kasprowicz M
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2022 Feb; 26(2):494-504. PubMed ID: 34115601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. k-Shape clustering for extracting macro-patterns in intracranial pressure signals.
Martinez-Tejada I; Riedel CS; Juhler M; Andresen M; Wilhjelm JE
Fluids Barriers CNS; 2022 Feb; 19(1):12. PubMed ID: 35123535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated EEG artifact elimination by applying machine learning algorithms to ICA-based features.
Radüntz T; Scouten J; Hochmuth O; Meffert B
J Neural Eng; 2017 Aug; 14(4):046004. PubMed ID: 28497769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Advances in Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Its Significance in Managing Traumatic Brain Injury.
Kawoos U; McCarron RM; Auker CR; Chavko M
Int J Mol Sci; 2015 Dec; 16(12):28979-97. PubMed ID: 26690122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Continuous cerebral compliance monitoring in severe head injury: its relationship with intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure.
Portella G; Cormio M; Citerio G; Contant C; Kiening K; Enblad P; Piper I
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2005 Jul; 147(7):707-13; discussion 713. PubMed ID: 15900402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hypertonic saline reduces cumulative and daily intracranial pressure burdens after severe traumatic brain injury.
Mangat HS; Chiu YL; Gerber LM; Alimi M; Ghajar J; Härtl R
J Neurosurg; 2015 Jan; 122(1):202-10. PubMed ID: 25380107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure-reactivity in head injury.
Czosnyka M; Smielewski P; Kirkpatrick P; Piechnik S; Laing R; Pickard JD
Acta Neurochir Suppl; 1998; 71():74-7. PubMed ID: 9779149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hemodynamic Instability and Cardiovascular Events After Traumatic Brain Injury Predict Outcome After Artifact Removal With Deep Belief Network Analysis.
Kim H; Lee SB; Son Y; Czosnyka M; Kim DJ
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2018 Oct; 30(4):347-353. PubMed ID: 28991060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship of "dose" of intracranial hypertension to outcome in severe traumatic brain injury.
Vik A; Nag T; Fredriksli OA; Skandsen T; Moen KG; Schirmer-Mikalsen K; Manley GT
J Neurosurg; 2008 Oct; 109(4):678-84. PubMed ID: 18826355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
