These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30562543)

  • 1. Participation weighting based on sociodemographic register data improved external validity in a population-based cohort study.
    Bonander C; Nilsson A; Björk J; Bergström GML; Strömberg U
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 108():54-63. PubMed ID: 30562543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting participation in the population-based Swedish cardiopulmonary bio-image study (SCAPIS) using register data.
    Björk J; Strömberg U; Rosengren A; Toren K; Fagerberg B; Grimby-Ekman A; BergströM GML
    Scand J Public Health; 2017 Jul; 45(17_suppl):45-49. PubMed ID: 28683666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correcting for selective participation in cohort studies using auxiliary register data without identification of non-participants.
    Bonander C; Nilsson A; Bergström GML; Björk J; Strömberg U
    Scand J Public Health; 2021 Jun; 49(4):449-456. PubMed ID: 31826719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bias from self selection and loss to follow-up in prospective cohort studies.
    Biele G; Gustavson K; Czajkowski NO; Nilsen RM; Reichborn-Kjennerud T; Magnus PM; Stoltenberg C; Aase H
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2019 Oct; 34(10):927-938. PubMed ID: 31451995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reweighting a Swedish health questionnaire survey using extensive population register and self-reported data for assessing and improving the validity of longitudinal associations.
    Nilsson A; Bonander C; Strömberg U; Canivet C; Östergren PO; Björk J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0253969. PubMed ID: 34197538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of non-response in a population-based cohort study on type 2 diabetes evaluated by the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register.
    Eriksson AK; Ekbom A; Hilding A; Ostenson CG
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2012 Mar; 27(3):153-62. PubMed ID: 22089424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Registry-based analysis of participator representativeness: a source of concern for sickness absence research?
    Knapstad M; Löve J; Holmgren K; Hensing G; Øverland S
    BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e012372. PubMed ID: 27798012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditing patient registration in the Swedish quality register for acute coronary syndrome.
    Rosvall M; Ohlsson H; Hansen O; Chaix B; Merlo J
    Scand J Public Health; 2010 Jul; 38(5):533-40. PubMed ID: 20406796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating selection bias in a population-based cohort study with low baseline participation: the LIFE-Adult-Study.
    Enzenbach C; Wicklein B; Wirkner K; Loeffler M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):135. PubMed ID: 31262266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluating the Validity of a Two-stage Sample in a Birth Cohort Established from Administrative Databases.
    El-Zein M; Conus F; Benedetti A; Parent ME; Rousseau MC
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):105-15. PubMed ID: 26427721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining Nonparticipation in the Maternal Follow-up Within the Danish National Birth Cohort.
    Bliddal M; Liew Z; Pottegård A; Kirkegaard H; Olsen J; Nohr EA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 187(7):1511-1519. PubMed ID: 29346474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inverse probability weighting for self-selection bias correction in the investigation of social inequality in mortality.
    Petersen GL; Jørgensen TSH; Mathisen J; Osler M; Mortensen EL; Molbo D; Hougaard CØ; Lange T; Lund R
    Int J Epidemiol; 2024 Jun; 53(4):. PubMed ID: 38996447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictors of Response Outcomes for Research Recruitment Through a Central Cancer Registry: Evidence From 17 Recruitment Efforts for Population-Based Studies.
    Millar MM; Kinney AY; Camp NJ; Cannon-Albright LA; Hashibe M; Penson DF; Kirchhoff AC; Neklason DW; Gilsenan AW; Dieck GS; Stroup AM; Edwards SL; Bateman C; Carter ME; Sweeney C
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 May; 188(5):928-939. PubMed ID: 30689685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do postal health surveys capture morbidity and mortality in respondents aged 65 years and older? A register-based validation study.
    Kelfve S; Lennartsson C; Agahi N; Modig K
    Scand J Public Health; 2015 Jun; 43(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 25754866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can the validity of a cohort be improved by reweighting based on register data? Evidence from the Swedish MDC study.
    Nilsson A; Bonander C; Strömberg U; Björk J
    BMC Public Health; 2020 Dec; 20(1):1918. PubMed ID: 33334333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in middle-aged women: a national matched cohort study on the influence of childbirth.
    Åkervall S; Al-Mukhtar Othman J; Molin M; Gyhagen M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):356.e1-356.e14. PubMed ID: 31639370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Incorporating group-level exposure information in case-control studies with missing data on dichotomous exposures.
    Strömberg U; Björk J
    Epidemiology; 2004 Jul; 15(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 15232411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sociodemographic predictors of non-attendance at invitational mammography screening--a population-based register study (Sweden).
    Lagerlund M; Maxwell AE; Bastani R; Thurfjell E; Ekbom A; Lambe M
    Cancer Causes Control; 2002 Feb; 13(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 11899121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reweighting to address nonparticipation and missing data bias in a longitudinal electronic health record study.
    Gianfrancesco MA; McCulloch CE; Trupin L; Graf J; Schmajuk G; Yazdany J
    Ann Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 50():48-51.e2. PubMed ID: 32807591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of prostate-specific antigen testing on familial prostate cancer risk estimates.
    Bratt O; Garmo H; Adolfsson J; Bill-Axelson A; Holmberg L; Lambe M; Stattin P
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2010 Sep; 102(17):1336-43. PubMed ID: 20724726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.