BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

540 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 30562575)

  • 1. Sequential conflict resolution under multiple concurrent conflicts: An ERP study.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M; Steinhauser M
    Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():411-418. PubMed ID: 30562575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Flanker task with equiprobable congruent and incongruent conditions does not elicit the conflict N2.
    Kałamała P; Szewczyk J; Senderecka M; Wodniecka Z
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Feb; 55(2):. PubMed ID: 28845513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Behavioral and ERP indices of response conflict in Stroop and flanker tasks.
    Tillman CM; Wiens S
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Oct; 48(10):1405-11. PubMed ID: 21457276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship of regular physical activity with neuroelectric indices of interference processing in young adults.
    Aly M; Kojima H
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Dec; 57(12):e13674. PubMed ID: 33460156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stroop N450 reflects both stimulus conflict and response conflict.
    Huang B; Chen C
    Neuroreport; 2020 Aug; 31(12):851-856. PubMed ID: 32453024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reward expectation modulates multiple stages of auditory conflict control.
    Kang G; Chang W; Wang L; Zhou X
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():148-156. PubMed ID: 31648025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus and response conflict in the color-word Stroop task: a combined electro-myography and event-related potential study.
    Szucs D; Soltész F
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():63-76. PubMed ID: 20153298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finding an interaction between Stroop congruency and flanker congruency requires a large congruency effect: A within-trial combination of conflict tasks.
    Rey-Mermet A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2271-2301. PubMed ID: 31974936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociation between reaction time and pupil dilation in the Stroop task.
    Hershman R; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1899-1909. PubMed ID: 30816765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Stroop matching task presents conflict at both the response and nonresponse levels: an event-related potential and electromyography study.
    Caldas AL; Machado-Pinheiro W; Souza LB; Motta-Ribeiro GC; David IA
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Sep; 49(9):1215-24. PubMed ID: 22748126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Common and specific loci of Stroop effects in vocal and manual tasks, revealed by event-related brain potentials and posthypnotic suggestions.
    Zahedi A; Abdel Rahman R; Stürmer B; Sommer W
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Sep; 148(9):1575-1594. PubMed ID: 30730196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Event-related potential indices of congruency sequence effects without feature integration or contingency learning confounds.
    Larson MJ; Clayson PE; Kirwan CB; Weissman DH
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Jun; 53(6):814-22. PubMed ID: 26854028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neurodevelopment of conflict adaptation: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Liu X; Liu T; Shangguan F; Sørensen TA; Liu Q; Shi J
    Dev Psychol; 2018 Jul; 54(7):1347-1362. PubMed ID: 29756794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural cascade of conflict processing: Not just time-on-task.
    McKay CC; van den Berg B; Woldorff MG
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():184-191. PubMed ID: 28017818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Supine body posture reduces cognitive conflict processing: Evidence from N450 Stroop interference.
    Sun CK; Harmon-Jones E
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Jan; 58(1):e13693. PubMed ID: 32996615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neural differences in the temporal cascade of reactive and proactive control for bilinguals and monolinguals.
    Rainey VR; Stockdale L; Flores-Lamb V; Kahrilas IJ; Mullins TL; Gjorgieva E; Morrison RG; Silton RL
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Jun; 58(6):e13813. PubMed ID: 33719030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal and spectral profiles of conflict processing among multiple frames of reference.
    Nan W; Wang C; Sun Y; Wang H; Fu S; Li Q; Liu X
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Apr; 56(4):e13313. PubMed ID: 30561786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Item-specific control of attention in the Stroop task: Contingency learning is not the whole story in the item-specific proportion-congruent effect.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Apr; 48(3):426-435. PubMed ID: 31705394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERP evidence for rapid within-trial adaptation of cognitive control during conflict resolution.
    Kałamała P; Ociepka M; Chuderski A
    Cortex; 2020 Oct; 131():151-163. PubMed ID: 32861969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.